Artistic Expression A comedian named Tommy Smothers, member of the Smother's Brothers comedy team and target of a battle over censorship, once said "The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen." (Smothers) This notion also applies to watching, and viewing artistic expression as well. While some in the United States have tried to impose their view of morality upon the nation through the censoring of what they consider "objectionable," others have fought back to maintain the right of free expression. In 1989, there was a case where a sitting Senator objected to the subject of a work of art that was awarded a government grant. This Senator wrote to the president complaining about the National Endowment for the Arts and it's support of this particular artist. In response the artist defiantly defended his right of artistic expression and warned of the dangers of censorship. If America is going to be a free nation, with freedom of speech and expression at the core of it's values, then American adults cannot be limited to the kinds of artistic expression that only some find acceptable. Americans must have the freedom of expression, even if they express very unpopular opinions; and if someone doesn't like it, they do not have to view it.

In 1989, Senator Jesse Helms objected to an artwork which depicted a crucifix in a bottle of urine. While the senator...

Instead, the Senator suggested that the National Endowment for the Arts "ought to be abolished and all funds returned to the taxpayer" (Helms, 1989) And while the Senator acknowledged this artist's constitutional right to freedom of expression, he didn't think the American taxpayers should finance it.
In response the artist, Andres Serrano, wrote a letter to the National Endowment for the Arts explaining the concept of his art and rationalizing his grant. He also stated "In a free society ideas, even difficult ones, are not dangerous. The only danger lies in repressing them." (Serrano, 1989) Serrano was correct, he had every right to artistically express himself any way he wanted.

What Senator Helms calls "Blasphemy and insensitivity to the religious community" (Helms, 1989), Andres Serrano calls his "exploration and juxtaposition of these symbols from which Christianity draws its strength." (Serrano, 1989) If the national government is going to be in the business of promoting the arts, it must promote a wide variety of artistic expression, without judgment or censorship. The government cannot be the arbitor of what is appropriate artistic expression; if so, then can the government…