..
III. Intellectual Properties
Eric Eldred, Et Al., Petitioners V. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General
U.S. 01 -- 618 (2003)
Facts:
Issue(s):
Ruling:
Analysis:
Minority Rationale:
Comments:
The differences between copyrights, trademarks, and patents include:
The title to real property is permanent, whereas some intellectual property is limited in the time that it is protected due to...
IV. Business and the Bill of Rights
Humana Inc., Et Al., Petitioners V. Mary Forsyth Et Al.
U.S. 97 -- 303 (1999)
Facts:
Issue(s):
Ruling:
Analysis:
Minority Rationale:
Comments:
The major difference between business speech and political speech is that...
Whether or not "Closely regulated industries are not afforded all Fourth Amendment guarantees against unreasonable search and seizure" is fair is determined by... (will give answer)
After briefing this case on Business and the Bill of Rights, this writer feels.. (whether rights of business were protected)
In defense of this position...
V. Administrative Agency
Timothy Booth, Petitioner V.C.O. Churner et al. U.S. No. 99-1964 (2001)
Facts:
Issue(s):
Ruling:
Analysis:
Minority Rationale:
Comments:
The primary reason the Administrative Agency exists is to...
One example of this agency's work:
To whom, if anyone, does it report?
The legislative and judicial branches come into play with investigation and enforcement of this agency when...
VI. Torts Relating to Business
Douglas Spector, Et Al., Petitioners V. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. U.S. No. 03 -- 1388 (2005)
Facts:
Issue(s):
Ruling:
Analysis:
Minority Rationale:
Comments:
VII. Contracts
Montana, Et Al., Petitioners V. Crow Tribe of Indians Et Al.
U.S. No. 96-1829
Facts:
Issue(s):
Ruling:
Analysis:
Minority Rationale:
Comments:
Identify element, the lament of the contract in dispute...
This conflict could have been avoided if...
Other elements which could have contributed to this contract becoming illegitimate are:
Considering that the plaintiff won this case, other ways the plaintiff could have been remidied in court include:
The kinds of contracts that must be in writing before they are considered enforceable are:
References
BRENNAN, J., Opinion of the Court.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES." (2006). Retrieved 07 July 2006 at http://www.landmarkcases.org/texas/pdf/texas_v_johnson.pdf.
Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department Of Corrections, Petitioner V. Ronald Banks, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated." (2006). Retrieved 07 July 2006 at http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=real%20property&url=/supt/html/04-1739.ZO.html.
Timothy Booth, Petitioner V.C.O. Churner et al." (2001). Retrieved 07 July 2006 at http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=Administrative%20gency&url=/supct/html/99-1964.ZO.html.
What is the Difference Between a Copyright, Trademark and Patent?" (2006). Retrieved 08 July 2006 at http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-copyright-trademark-and-patent.htm.
Court Briefs - 7 Different Cases
Legal Briefs Title and Citation: Suggs v. Norris. No. 364 S.E. 2nd 159. Court of Appeals North Carolina. 2 February 1988 Type of Action: Civil and Contractual Facts of the Case: Darlene Suggs cohabited with Norris, but remained unmarried. During their time together she worked with him as a partner in his produce business and, according to witnesses, was quite instrumental in the success of said business. Suggs also took care of Norris
Lbs Homework Sheet Quinain v. Doe, 516140 App. Div., 3rd Dept (2013) Who is/are the plaintiff(s) (i.e. consumer, company, employee, government) and what type of legal relief is/are the plaintiff(s) seeking? The plaintiff are a group of people who developed a close relationship with George Rossi and took possession of his parcel of land after his death. What legal question must the court decide, and what is the common law rule, constitutional provision or
Supreme Court Decision in Wooden vs. the United StatesWooden vs. the United StatesCase BriefIn 1997, William Wooden Broke into a storage facility in Georgia and stole ten different units, resulting in a guilty plea to 10 counts of burglary. In 2014, a plainclothes officer visited Wooden’s home where he asked to see his wife and was invited in and realized Wooden had a riffle. Soon after, he was arrested for being a felon in
Knorpp v Hale 981 SW 2nd 469 (Tex. App. 1998) Knorpp v Hale is a case from Texas that deals with the issues of responsibility towards an individual coming onto one's personal property and then experiencing a danderous or negative situation. In this case, Bonita Knorpp believed that her son, Todd Erwin, was a licensee rather than an invitee at the time of his death. The procedural history of this case focuses
Whistle-Blower Case Study Based on Oklahoma Law It may appear common-sense that Janet and Darla are whistle-blowers; they saw something wrong at their workplace (another employee potentially stealing drugs and committing fraud), and notified their employer. However, while they may have effectively blown the whistle on potential fraud, they are also working in a state with "at will" employment laws, which states employers can fire employees for any reason (Bennett-Alexander &
When neither elected to do so, however, there was a violation of the New York Penal Code, leading to the consideration of their guilt or innocence. Implications Under Article 20 of New York Penal Law While the condemnation of a victim is not a viable defense, the implications for Bluto and his obligations under Article 20 deserves exploration. Just as Duty of Retreat applied to Popeye and Olive, it likewise applied
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now