Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Crime - Durkheim
What does Emile Durkheim mean when he says crime is "normal"? In Durkheim's book, Division of Labor, according to author Stephen P. Turner, Durkheim said crime is inevitable and it is normal. What was the justification for those statements? How did he come to make what today would seem an outrage?
In the larger context, Durkheim emphasized that law and morality are linked, and that what is considered "illegal" is generally believed to also be "immoral" in the opinion of the general public (Turner, 1993, pp. 71-72). He believed that if religion and morality had sufficient power and authority in society, if "socialization to society's values were perfect," and if existing religious and moral values were "perfectly known," all citizens would be behaving according to those values. Behaving properly would be what everyone did in that instance, and there would be "no challenge to the society's dominant values" -- hence, law would be pointless because no one would be out of line (Turner, 72).
However he was perceptive enough to realize that "…such a universal and absolute uniformity is utterly impossible" and hence, crime does exist and will...
And moreover, though it will vary in degree from one society to the next, it is "impossible for any society to be free of crime" and since the nature of social life that people will "diverge to some extent from the collective type" it's also inevitable that "among these deviations" some will be played out in a law-breaking, criminal "character" (Turner, quoting Durkheim, 72).
So, not only is crime inevitable, Durkheim "shocked his contemporaries" and future generations of students and scholars when he asserted that "crime is normal… [and] it is a factor in public health, an integrative element in any healthy society" (Turner, 72, quoting Durkheim's remarks made in 1895). Durkheim insisted that crime is useful for a healthy society, but how can that statement be explained? First of all, crime is normal, he said, because it is inevitable; and expecting a crime-free world is absurd. But he went on to explain that if there was such a powerful government-promoted degree of social control to prevent crime that would "…constitute an intolerable repressive society, one that would be destructive of all individuality" (Turner, 73). If a…
Works Cited
Harris, Irving Brooks. (1996). Children in Jeopardy: Can We Break the Cycle of Poverty?
Volume 1 of Yale Child Study Center Monograph Series on Child Psychiatry. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press.
Parsons, Talcott. (1965). Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory,
Crime Theories and Sociology Crime theories and sociological perspective Crime is an overt omission or action through which a person breaks the law, hence the action is punishable and the person may be convicted in the court of law for the said action. It is the subject of great debate in sociology and criminology that what constitutes crime. Since deviation from law has to be considered as crime, the nature and context
Crimes Criminal Activities Crimes against public disorder In order to be convicted of disorderly conduct, according to the State of Massachusetts the defendant must have committed three specific things: 1) involved themselves in fighting, threatening, or violent behavior, or create a situation that is hazardous or physically offensive, 2) the defendants actions were most likely to affect the public, and 3) the defendant must have intended to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm,
Durkheim's Study Of Suicide In Emile Durkheim's (1997) book Suicide, he discusses both the causes of and the reasons for suicide. He also addresses the components of different sociological theories that show that what comes from within a person matters equally with their outside environment when it comes to the issues they face during their lives. Strong evidence is provides that peer pressure and the lack of a strong system of
" Nowadays, students have to choose between different academic disciplines: maybe one student prefers to be a psychologist rather than a physician. And then once the student has decided on psychology, he must choose, for example, to be a psychology major, as opposed to a physician major. Further more, there are even different categories within disciplines: social psychology, organizational psychology, clinical psychology, educational psychology etc., each with its own concepts, terminology
From the above description, it is clear that mechanical solidarity unites members of a society through personal bonds or social cohesion, which was particular to pre-industrial societies. This mechanical solidarity occurred, when all members of a society performed the same or nearly the same tasks as all others in a society. On the other hand, in the organic solidarity, as societies begin to modernize, they begin to industrialize and labor
Emile Zola and Honere De Balzac were writers that embraced their century and time period. They wrote comprehensive histories of their respective contemporary societies. Although they share a similar interest in dissecting time throughout their novels, Emile shows a more modern take on time than does Honere De Balzac. In fact, his methodical approach to the social, moral, and sexual landscape of the late nineteenth century proves Zola as the