Criminal Justice Unethical Behavior Mark Research Paper

The infamous O.J. Simpson murder trial turned out to be a good case in point of what an officer should not do with regards to a criminal case. As the lead investigator looking into the murders of Mr. Goldman and Ms. Simpson, Detective Mark Fuhrman was a great example of ineptitude. There is a deep rooted theory that Det. Fuhrman planted evidence at the crime scene and falsified official police reports and other papers in an attempt to avoid the justice system and get a conviction against Mr. Simpson. Even though Det. Fuhrman never openly confessed to these things, the transcript of his testimony shows this to be the case. When asked during the trial if he did these things, he invoked his 5th amendment rights and refused to answer the questions. The belief is that if he hadn't done such things he would have just said so (Belrad, 2009).

According to the way things should be done, during testimony, the investigating officer should never feel bound to change facts or to make declarations that could harm or obstruct their...

...

Mark Fuhrman obviously failed to grasp to this most critical of all guidelines. It should be pointed out that by testifying to the fact that the planted evidence was genuine, he was enduring to forge the facts of the case during the trial stage. As substantiation by the concluding verdict of the trial, Detective Fuhrman's input to the case, in an attempt to aid the prosecution, was the single biggest factor in the acquittal of the defendant. Mr. Simpson's innocence or guilt was never in fact tried, completely because of how poorly the investigation was muddled by Fuhrman (Belrad, 2009).

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Belrad, Bryan. (2009). Mark Fuhrman and the OJ Simpson murder trial: A study in officer testimony. Retrieved from http://www.helium.com/items/846239-mark-fuhrman-and-the-

oj-simpson-murder-trial-a-study-in-officer-testimony

Brennan, Warren O. (2010). Mark Fuhrman and the OJ Simpson murder trial: A study in officer testimony. Retrieved from http://www.helium.com/items/1848468-oj


Cite this Document:

"Criminal Justice Unethical Behavior Mark" (2011, July 18) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-unethical-behavior-mark-43377

"Criminal Justice Unethical Behavior Mark" 18 July 2011. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-unethical-behavior-mark-43377>

"Criminal Justice Unethical Behavior Mark", 18 July 2011, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-unethical-behavior-mark-43377

Related Documents

Criminal Justice System: Ethics in Criminal Procedure Ethics refers to the principles of morality that govern an individual's behavior. Ethics, therefore, provides the basis through which an individual defines, and distinguishes between the good and the bad. This implies that it is ethics that provides the framework for the duties and responsibilities an individual owes to himself, and to the community. Today, ethics define how corporations, professionals, and individuals relate with

Current standards are based on male offenders and viewed as inappropriate for non-violent female offenders, who constitute the majority of incarcerated women. This also explains the rise of imprisonment for economic crimes, which involve a disproportionate number of women. AI also recommended against criminalizing drug-dependent pregnant women, as doing so had driven dependent women underground instead of towards treatment and this reduced access to prenatal care of treatment. Racism

Unethical Leadership
PAGES 10 WORDS 2942

Unethical Leadership Leadership is not an inherited gift or a family heritage. Becoming a leader is a deliberate and planned process of personal and professional development that must be carried out experientially. It requires one to have the courage to say both "yes" and "no' to an everlasting chain of large and small tests. In order to become a true leader, one must be prepared to define his/her values, character, and

Criminal Law and Psychopathy
PAGES 23 WORDS 6937

Criminal Law and Psychopathy I. Introduction Various studies have in the past indicated that there is a high correlation between violence/criminal behavior and psychopathy. This would largely be expected given that psychological studies into the character and disposition of psychopaths has demonstrated that the need for control (or power) as well as egocentrism, which also happen to be the dominant character traits of psychopaths, are predictors for deviant or antisocial behavior. The

However, the neuroimaging process would have to be performed exactly when the criminal performs a crime in order to understand more about his brain status, as mental states change and the criminal can think differently in diverse circumstances. In contrast to mental states, however, genes remain the same throughout one's life and authorities can actually understand if a criminal had a criminal mind or not by studying them (Gregoriou,

Cultural beliefs transmitted by media include such notions as police officers are heroes. In reality, the media works in strengthening and affirming the cultural notions present in a society. It holds true particularly for the messages about the ethics involved in the crime and justice incidents transmitted by the media. Many people do not experience crime firsthand or the system through which justice is brought. In this case, it is