Critique Of Website Competitor Benchmark Research Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
1052
Cite
Related Topics:

¶ … Competitor Benchmark Critique The objective of this project is to use the competitor benchmark to compare the following websites:

http://nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html

http://amatteroftaste.me/

The audience of the two websites include tourists, holiday makers and people seeking to have a nice time.

The study uses the functionality, marketing tactics, navigation, content, usability, multimedia and e-commerce for the benchmark analysis.

Look and Feel

A comparative analysis of the two websites reveals that amatteroftaste.me scores higher than the second website in term of font style, and screen. The color content of the amatteroftaste.me is better by using the white color in the background and dark colors on top of the white color. The strategy makes the font be more readable to the user than the font of the nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html website. Moreover, the screen of the amatteroftaste.me is better than the screen of the second website making the contents be more readable to users. The amatteroftaste.me also uses the flash video to display the products and services offered to the customer making the website more appealing to users than nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html, the second website, which has no flash to display the product and services making the website less appealing to users. In this category, amatteroftaste.me score 75% while the second website scores 40%.

Navigation

The navigation platform of the amatteroftaste.me is more appealing than the navigation platform of the http://nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html. The http://nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html has 6 menus while the amatteroftaste.me has five menus and 14 sub-menus. Moreover, the amatteroftaste.me submenus elaborate the product and services...

...

Moreover, all the menus of the amatteroftaste.me are functioning however some of the menus of the nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html are not functioning. Typically, only ABOUT ME menu is completed, however, the MY HOME menu is still under construction. All other menus are not functioning. Contrarily, all the menus of the amatteroftaste.me are functioning. Based on the analysis, amatteroftaste.me scores 85% while the second website scores 30%.
Content

Similarly, the amatteroftaste.me has a better score in the website's content than the content of the other website. Apart from being professional written, its contents are easier to understand than the content of the second website. For example, the content of the Home Page of the amatteroftaste.me is professionally written in such a way that a person with little understanding of English will understand the content. Moreover, the website uses the pictures as the visual presentations to explain the content of the Home Page. On the other hand, the content of the Home Page of the http://nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html is not as colorful and understandable as the content of the other website. In the Home Page of HELEEN MELIA TOWNSEND website, the word contents are too elaborate, and the pictures on the home page are not as professional as the pictures of the http://amatteroftaste.me website. Moreover, there are some grammatical errors identified in the About Me menu of the nova.umuc.edu/~im639c23/imat639/about.html website. Some of the grammatical errors are as follows:

"I lived on the beautiful and lively 32 square mile capitol," and (Townsend, 2016 p 1).

"I am a native of the Caribbean by way of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI)."

(Townsend, 2016 p 1). Although, both websites are legible enough to enhance…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

Sauro, J. (2013). How To Benchmark Website Usability. Measuring U.

Townsend, H.M. (2016).Who Am I. University of Maryland University College.


Cite this Document:

"Critique Of Website Competitor Benchmark" (2016, June 25) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/critique-of-website-competitor-benchmark-2158362

"Critique Of Website Competitor Benchmark" 25 June 2016. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/critique-of-website-competitor-benchmark-2158362>

"Critique Of Website Competitor Benchmark", 25 June 2016, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/critique-of-website-competitor-benchmark-2158362

Related Documents

Lufthansa Structure and Governance. Performance and Competition. Five-force analysis. Lufthansa is one of the oldest and most successful commercial airlines in the world, and is the fourth-largest in terms of passengers. However, the company has not always been so successful, and in fact was teetering on the brink of bankruptcy just a short while ago. By examining Lufthansa's history, structure, governance, and contemporary strategies and goals, one is able to see how the company

Delta Is a Legacy Carrier,
PAGES 9 WORDS 2824

For example, Delta cannot readily expand to Canada by any means because of regulatory limits on foreign carriers. Competition is a key driver of change in the industry as well. Firms behave in a manner similar to oligopolies, responding to each other's moves. This forces firms to be creative with respect to how they attract and retain customers. An innovation like loyalty programs is easily replicated by all competitors in

Google Introduction and Description of the Company Organizational Structure Industry Analysis Value Proposition Financial Performance Figure 1.1 Revenue and Net Income Growth TOWS Strategies BCG Matrix Leadership Alliances Measures Google is a highly successful Internet company that makes most of its money through online advertising. It has been able to achieve this success through a combination of leadership and culture. The company's many strengths are in general aligned with the opportunities that exist in the marketplace. As a result, Google has the

This level of the maturity model is a transitory one and is focused more on either small, incremental gains from the first level, which is Reacting. In the Reacting layer of this proposed Branding Maturity Model, the majority of brand departments have a decidedly "every department for itself" approach to process maturity and have information flow that is purely dependent on personal productivity applications only. That is to say

His ideas are not important for their uniqueness (though they are singular), but because of the essential similarities between his conservative business utopia and other versions of collectivism" (Gilbert, p. 12). This biographer reports that King Camp Gillette was born in January 1855, the fifth of seven children, to George Wolcott Gillette and Fanny Camp Gillette, in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin; when King was four years old, the family

Corporate Sustainability Summary of the purpose of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Reporting corporate sustainability is one of the best ways to ensure that a company is not only doing well financially in the present but also in securing a better and more certain future. The reporting of corporate suitability ensures that the current needs of the organization are effectively met without comprising future needs of the organization. Reporting on corporate sustainability also ensure