Cross-Cultural Leadership Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
977
Cite
Related Topics:

As Kassar, Rouhana nad Lythreatis (2015) state, “while ‘expats’ can provide continuity, valuable expertise, and other skills, they must acclimatize successfully and remain in the job a reasonable time” (p. 4). In the case of KAPResources Consulting Firm, a group of culturally diverse team members, some of whom are expats, are being led by an individual from a completely different cultural background. Hofstede has shown with his 5 cultural dimensions how important it is for a leader in such a situation to pick up on the cultural dimensions that are strongest and weakest in the group so as to respond accordingly. For instance, if there is a high Power Distance Index within the group, the leader should approach the situation differently than if the Power Distance Index is low. This same consideration should be given to the other four indices as well—the Individualism versus Collectivism index, the Masculinity versus Femininity Index, the Uncertainty Avoidance Index, the Pragmatic versus Normative Index, and the Indulgence versus Restraint Index (MindTools, 2018). As the leader of the group, my proposal for a plan for the dinner event at which the team members and their spouses join to meet, interact and feel more interconnected would begin with a simple introduction of one another as we all sit down around the table. It is important...

...

Getting their preferences ahead of time so that their choices are available at the dinner will show that I am a thoughtful and conscientious and considerate leader and this will make them more open to my suggestions once we are all seated.
The plan would begin with me introducing myself and telling a little bit about my background coming from Puerto Rico. I would describe myself and my background in such a way as to give cues to the other team members that they should follow suit: the key characteristics I would select to tell would be ones that are related to Hofstead’s 5 cultural dimensions model. In this way, I could lay out how I see things and how I present my cultural dimensions and I could expect that the rest of the team could share their experiences and perspectives. Doing it this way would also allow me to gather this information without seeming too pushy or like I am being demanding. I would simply be setting the example and allowing others to choose whether or not they want to follow in my example. If they choose to follow, that will tell me something about their cultural dimensions and if they do not choose to follow but choose to focus on some other way of introducing themselves, that would also tell me something about them.…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Kassar, A. N., Rouhana, A., & Lythreatis, S. (2015). Cross-cultural Training. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 80(4), 4.

Lumsden, G., Lumsden, D., &Weithoff, C. (2010). Communicating in groups and teams: Sharing leadership (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

MindTools. (2018). Hofstede’s 5 cultural dimensions. Retrieved from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_66.htm



Cite this Document:

"Cross-Cultural Leadership" (2018, April 02) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cross-cultural-leadership-term-paper-2167278

"Cross-Cultural Leadership" 02 April 2018. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cross-cultural-leadership-term-paper-2167278>

"Cross-Cultural Leadership", 02 April 2018, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cross-cultural-leadership-term-paper-2167278

Related Documents

Internal and external customers are both considered important and their needs must be anticipated and satisfied in the most suitable manner. The decisions that the executive leader makes must be based on solid information. He must be aware of the consequences of his decisions. At the same time, he must have a long-term perspective and make the best choice even if at the beginning its consequences might seem negative. A

Cross Cultural Leadership Cultural Differences in Leadership Cultural differences determine certain leadership traits and portions of our personality. It is easy to discredit the importance of cross-cultural differences and their influences on various leadership styles. Different cultures are known for certain traits. For instance, the Australian culture is known for it egalitarianism. Chinese culture is known as an authority oriented culture (Sharpe, 2007). These differences in culture result in the development of

Cross-Cultural Communication With increased competition being witnessed in many industries, Multinational companies are setting shop to new foreign markets as a way of increasing their profitability and remaining competitive. Many countries have liberalized their markets, and present advancement in technologies has made it easy for companies to open new branches in foreign markets. However, this also comes with it challenges, particularly relating to cross-cultural communication. Effective cross-cultural communication is very important

In that regard, fundamentally different interactions between the genders is one element of cultural practices that differs most substantially from national culture to culture and even among individuals of different ethnic or religious backgrounds within the dominant national culture. Typically, individuals of Muslim and Jewish religious traditions (and others) avoid any incidental or polite physical contact between members of the opposite gender, even though such gestures (like handshaking) might be

This disconnect from a cultural standpoint needs more empirical research to further understand and capitalize on from a change management strategy perspective as well. Implications for Individuals Working Multinationally with the Japanese The work completed by Masumoto has major implications not only for expatriates working in Japan yet for anyone going to work for a Japanese company anywhere in a westernized nation. The vast differences in how space is allocated are

Additionally the theory also provides for instrumentality which is based on the belief that the performance will result in rewards. In essence, valence is the importance linked with an individual on the expected result (Steele, 2011).This expectation is not the satisfaction that employees expect to receive after achieving the goals: it is seen in Haier through recognition. Expectancy is the faith that best efforts will result in better performance.