Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Culture and Place?
Mitchell's (1995) article, "There's no Such Thing as Culture," gives an interesting take on the conventional understanding of culture in geography. Mitchell does not deny the existence of culture; instead, he critiques the traditional conception of culture as static and argues against essentialist notions that often define it. He posits that culture is not a bounded or unchanging entity but a dynamic and contested process that is always changing due to various inputs and moving parts.
This perspective has big implications for the conceptualization of place, as discussed by both Cresswell and Massey. In his introduction to "Place: A Short Introduction," Cresswell (2004) sees place as a site where meanings are contested and produced. He suggests that places are not mere backdrops but are actively involved in the production of culture. This aligns with Mitchell's view of culture as a process, emphasizing the dynamic nature of place. In other words, if culture is always in the making and is contested, then places, as sites where culture is produced and lived, are also sites of contestation. This means that places are not just passive backdrops but are active in terms of how culture is construed, developed, maintained, perpetuated, and interpreted.
Massey (1991) also challenges in "A Global Sense of Place" the static understanding of place. She views places as products of interrelations, always evolving and constituted through interactions from local to global scales. Places are dynamicjust like culture. This perspective echoes Mitchell's argument against a localized or bounded view of culture. For Massey, just as culture is unbounded and dynamic, places too should be seen as being shaped by interactions at various scales.
Ultimately, Mitchell's reconceptualization of culture as a dynamic process aligns with Cresswell's and Massey's views on place. All three scholars push against static notions, emphasizing the fluidity and contestation inherent in both culture and place. Understanding culture as a process allows for a richer appreciation of the multifaceted and ever-evolving nature of places.
References
Cresswell, T. (2004). Introduction: Defining place. In Place: A short introduction (pp. 1-14).
Blackwell.
Massey, D. (1991). A global sense of place. In Space, place, and gender (pp. 146-156).
University of Minnesota Press.
Mitchell, D. (1995). There's no such thing as culture: Towards a reconceptualization of the idea
of culture in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20(1), 102-116.
Culture of Interest: Japan Theoretical foundations of cultural and cross-cultural analysis: Japan and America Japan: Mildly collectivist culture American culture American: An individualistic culture Similarities and differences in Japanese and U.S. culture Potential biases of researcher Appendix I- Hofstede four Dimensional Theory Edward Tylor (1832-1917) defines culture as a collection of customs, laws, morals, knowledge, and symbols displayed by a society and its constituting members. Culture is form of collective expression by groups of people. Since the dawn
Culture and the Work of Lahiri Focusing questions: After looking at three or four definitions of culture from different dictionaries, what do these definitions have in common? In the United States, some members of ethnic groups who have been in the country for several generations or more may feel distant from their cultures or even without a culture. What are the various factors that account for these feelings? The Four Definitions of
Culture Psych Culture and Human Psychology: An Examination of Gift-Giving in Different Nations Culture is a complex phenomenon that evades being defined in terms that are at once comprehensive and concrete -- any entirely firm definition of culture is bound to leave out some elements of some cultures, and any definition that is all-inclusive is necessarily unspecific in certain regards. Put broadly, culture can be thought of as the sum total of
D.). For example, in the U.S., decisions are frequently delegated, that is, an official assigns responsibility for a particular matter to a subordinate. In many European nations, like Germany, there is a strong value placed on holding decision-making responsibilities oneself. When decisions are made by groups of people, majority rule is a common approach in the U.S. while in Germany consensus is the preferred mode. One should be conscious that
Americans going to Singapore to entertain the possibility of establishing business there, need to know each of the three cultures prefers to deal. Religion plays an important part in the cultural life of every country, and a peer-reviewed article in the Journal of International Business Research points out the cultural realities regarding the negotiation styles of Muslim Iranians, Buddhist Taiwanese and Christian Americans. The independent variables in this research --
Culture's Impact On Healthcare Culture: Midwestern, (White Female) The following are the top 5 characteristics of my culture: Conservative political values. May cause a closed mine and limit the imagination. Political lines are dogmatic and prevent free thinking. Family orientated. This bias may cause the individual to be too loyal on one's family. It is very difficult to see our families for who they truly are. Open minded: Too much open-mindedness may lead to foolish