Young people had always danced as a means of socializing with one another. However, prior to the 1950s, it was considered appropriate for a girl to dance with a variety of partners, even if she came to a dance with a particular young man. By the mid-1950s, views changed, and it was considered insulting to cut-in on someone else's date (Sombat). In addition, rock and roll, which featured more suggestive lyrics than prior forms of music, seemed to encourage casual sexual contact between men and women. Rock music has only grown more suggestive with time, as have rock stars, helping create a popular culture that thrives on marketing sexuality. However, that does not mean that young couples were expected to marry. On the contrary, in 1953 a sociologist wrote that "each boy and girl ideally should date 25 to 50 eligible marriage partners before making his or her final decision" (Burzumato). Therefore, an emphasis on role-playing for marriage did not mean that teenagers were expected to find marriage partners immediately.
Part of these changing attitudes was reflected in the sexual behavior of teenagers in the 1950s. Modern people have an image of the 1950s as a chaste and innocent time. However, sexual relations changed dramatically in the 1950s, even before the sexual revolution of the 1960s. First, it became more acceptable to engage in mild public displays of affection, such as kissing, hugging or hand holding (Sombat). However, it was the increased privacy that dating couples enjoyed in the 1950s that really led to an increase in sexual behavior among teens. Much of this privacy could be attributed to automobiles, which provided teenagers with a zone of mobile privacy. While the outward image may have been one of chastity, the reality is that dating teenagers in the 1950s were expected to participate in some degree of sexual activity. " in fact, the ideas of 'necking' and 'petting' were prolific and understood by everyone who participated in dating" (Sombat). While intercourse may have remained somewhat taboo for young couples, making out was not. During the 1950s, adults were not only aware that teenagers were engaging in sexual behaviors, but also that cars provided them with the opportunity to do so. Therefore, they tried to manipulate times and locations in a way to make sex impossible (Sombat).
Modern dating rituals may be rooted in the rituals established in the 1950s, but it would be impossible to confuse the two. Instead, drastic changes have occurred in the half-century since the 1950s. For example, in the 1950s, dating was preparation for
Currently, while dating can still be preparation for marriage, with people marrying at younger ages and sexual activity outside of marriage being the norm, dating has become more recreational (Hagedorn). This more casual approach towards dating has been encouraged by and encourages a more casual approach to sex. In fact, may young adults, especially those of college age, no longer engage in dating but in the practice of hooking up with another person solely for companionship and sexual activity (Hagedorn). That does not negate the fact that many people still engage in short-term monogamous relationships that have the same connotations as going steady. Interestingly enough, these relationships may have helped usher in the current culture of divorce:
Every time a steady couple "breaks up," something like a mini divorce occurs, complete with a divorce settlement and custody dispute -- a dividing up of the assets, property and other persons involved. Each party must return (or negotiate custody of) jackets, T-shirts, jewelry, CDs, etc. bought for each other or together. And what about friends? Who would get "custody" of mutual friends? I have known college couples, and even high school couples, to buy a pet together -- goldfish, hamsters, etc., which leads to a dispute over the care-giving of a living creature (Burzumato).
When looking at dating practices as part of the culture at large, it is easy to identify the 1950s as a time of great change in the American social landscape. Though frequently portrayed as a conservative era that idealized the image of the nuclear family, the 1950s were actually a radical time for popular culture. American teens, previously confined to their homes and allowed to meet members of the opposite sex only in controlled environments, were permitted to date without adult supervision. Moreover, teenagers and their parents realized that some sexual behavior was to be expected in this new dating environment. The 1950s was followed by a major cultural revolution in the 1960s, which saw the beginning of skyrocketing divorce rates. However, it is important to realize that many of those divorcing in the 1960s and 1970s were dating in the 1950s. Finally, this change in dating behavior coexisted with the rise of rock and roll, a form of musical expression that has consistently emphasized sexuality. All of these cultural changes combined to change the face of American society into the America of the 2010s.
Burzumato, Skip. "A Brief History of Courtship and Dating in America, Part 2." Boundless
Webzine. N.p. 8 Mar. 2007. Web. 26 Oct. 2010.
Hagedorn, Elizabeth. "Dating through the Decades." Miami Quarterly Online. N.p. 9 Feb.
2009. Web. 26 Oct. 2010.
Sombat, Windy. "Teenage Dating in the 1950s." The…
However, that does not mean that young couples were expected to marry. On the contrary, in 1953 a sociologist wrote that "each boy and girl ideally should date 25 to 50 eligible marriage partners before making his or her final decision" (Burzumato). Therefore, an emphasis on role-playing for marriage did not mean that teenagers were expected to find marriage partners immediately.
Television's Depiction Of American Family In The 1950s And 1960s Television depiction of the American family in the 1950s and early 1960s Television has for many years shaped the American society depending on the prevailing circumstances at that time. Ordinarily it is expected that television as a form of art would mimic the real life, but this has not always been true across the eras since at some point, television shaped and
American Family in Television Entertainment Popular Culture: The American Family in Television Entertainment In the 1950s and 1960s, television entertainment depicted a "traditional" American family, which generally equaled a man and woman who were married, homeowners, had at least one car (sometimes two), and had two to three children (Taylor, 1989). There were exceptions, of course, but television indicated to the American people that the "norm" was to have this particular type
Hmong Culture Health Hmong Health Culture The Hmong people are a group of Asian-Americans who have been living in the United States since an immigration program was started in 1975. Because of their strong animistic faith and beliefs in the supernatural, they have been slow to adapt to the healthcare practices of the United States. The Hmong continue to rely on alternative medicine and faith healers to cure illnesses. Health Beliefs and Practices
Mass Culture in Postwar Japan: As Seen Through the Films, Tokyo Drifter and Ohayo Post war Japan was flung into a mass market that was unlike any she had ever seen before. Old cultural ties and values were challenged and sometimes discarded. Everything from traditional gender roles and family standards to westernized dress and mass media. The challenges that people faced were enormous and included a generation gap that might have
Divorce Culture The objective of this study is to answer the question of whether the popular argument that children are better off when divorce makes one or both of the child's parents happier is true as argued by Barbara Defoe Whitehead. The work of Barbara Dafoe Whitehead gained attention when she wrote the book 'The Divorce Culture'. Whitehead speaks of 'expressive divorce' or the notion that "divorce is an instrument for
Arab Culture Understanding the Arab mind and cultural mentality is a contentious issue and one that has been debated from a number of points-of-view. Many modern scholars and researchers claim that much of the analysis of Arab culture is biased towards a Eurocentric and Western perspective. Critics claim that generalized statements of the constitution and characteristics of the Arab mind are often denigrating and racist in their views of the differences