David Sedaris In His Short Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
829
Cite

Sedaris then uses exaggeration to reinforce the threat of failure by describing the need to "... dodge chalk and protect our heads and stomachs whenever she approached us with a question." The literal image is, of course, exaggerated for humor, but the fear of inevitable failure in the eyes of an authority figure who probably prefers our failures to our successes because of the opportunity they represent to chastise us is identifiable to most readers. Likewise, despite the exaggerated imagery, Sedaris also reminds us of the connection between anxiety from the fear of failure (particularly in front of an audience) and abdominal discomfort.

Sedaris continues in that direction, culminating in his description of the teacher's accidentally stabbing the shy Korean student in the eye with a "freshly sharpened pencil," also adding the humor in the sarcasm of the author's observation "in fairness" that the pencil attack was at least unintentional.

One of the author's best uses of humorous description and comedic exaggeration to remind the reader of identifiable fears and frustrations comes in the paragraph where the author describes his growing self-perception of being completely unable to express himself in a foreign language and the fear of public embarrassment with which most readers can...

...

Stopping for coffee, asking directions, depositing money in my bank account: these things were out of the question, as they involved having to speak.... When the phone rang, I ignored it. If someone asked me a question, I pretended to be deaf."
The author concludes that paragraph with his most effective uses of comedic imagery, exaggeration, sarcasm, the unexpected, and the common shared fear of public embarrassment in wondering "why they don't sell cuts of meat in vending machines," implying unmistakably, that his shame from the inability to express himself intelligently in French limited him very strictly to goods and services that are available without requiring any human interaction whatsoever.

Again, in that instance, Sedaris uses a punch line whose effectiveness is magnified by surprise, as nobody would ever imagine buying fresh meat from a vending machine. The imagery of picturing a vending machine with cold cuts dripping in their meaty juices is as effective as all of the author's other uses of comedic imagery, exaggeration, and sarcasm as vehicles for his observational commentary and humor.

Cite this Document:

"David Sedaris In His Short" (2007, November 25) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/david-sedaris-in-his-short-34002

"David Sedaris In His Short" 25 November 2007. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/david-sedaris-in-his-short-34002>

"David Sedaris In His Short", 25 November 2007, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/david-sedaris-in-his-short-34002

Related Documents

David Sedaris The Unconfronted Reality and Social Mores in "Big Boy" by David Sedaris In the collection of short stories "Me talk pretty one day," author David Sedaris presented his experiences as an individual who was gradually growing in an environment that seemed hostile to what he has become: a homosexual with a lisp, though tremendously knowledgeable with words and talented with composition. This is the first impression that the reader gets

In “Jesus Shaves,” David Sedaris writes about the comical but complex losses of translation when trying to explain a religious festival in a second language. All the students in the class are learning French as a second language, but come from different backgrounds. The author is American, but classmates are from Poland, Morocco, and Italy. In fact, the Moroccan student is the one that triggers the theme of cultural relativism

Nobody Mean More to Me than You and the Future Life of Willie Jordan," June Jordan writes about the need to pay attention to Black English and to learn how important it is for African-American cultural identity. In David Sedaris's "Me Talk Pretty One Day," the author writes about how hard it is to learn a new language: French, in particular. Although both authors write about language diversity, Jordan

We can assume that by the twentieth century, times would have changed. The typical family in 2075 will look radically different than it does today. Families will be looked upon units rather than families and their significance will be greatly diminished due to logic, reason, and the absence of bonding. The family will be more like a contribution to society - a cog in the wheel, if you will -