This comes so early that the nation will not be ready to abandon some of the activities being done to counter terrorist attacks. Nonetheless, the U.S. is still experiencing numerous serious threats from its enemies like the al-Qaeda and other terrorist actors in the world. The strategy will serve as a good idea but a serious threat to the general existence of peace and stability in the country. The basic mechanisms of counterterrorism will be eradicated when the nation is facing serious certainties of attacks from the wounded enemies. Asia in the balance: Transforming U.S. military strategy in Asia

After the Second World War, the United States has been at a forefront in ensuring the security of its allies and commodities found in China. The interests bestowed by the state have seen the state establishing a number of strategic options. These strategic options are geared at maintaining peace and stability within China. For instance, the state has been assuring military alliance, stable ground and air forces, nuclear participations and establishment, and carrier-strike groups within the region. Nonetheless, the strategy has not been a success due to its reception by the Chinese government. The government of China has maintained a continuum of no support to the U.S. interests. In fact, the host country has been working systematically in order to thwart U.S. plans to have their establishment in the country.

The specifications laid by the Chinese forces threaten the establishment of the U.S. military base in China. With respect to the approaches issued by the Chinese government, it will be hard for the U.S. military to coexist within hostile and disunited forces from China. There is likelihood that the Chinese army will force and desert the U.S. allies within the Asia Pacific region. This will thwart the plans laid by the U.S. security system in the region. With this, the U.S. strategy could backfire and harm the entire U.S. government...

The central idea is that the military balance is going against the American wishes. The state cannot be positioned further to pursue its broad objectives.
The U.S. strategizes to scale back its commitments while narrowing the U.S. definition of its roles in the world. This strategy is set to bring the U.S. interests in an open spot and make central objectives that are directed at establishing peaceful coexistence with the nation. Nonetheless, the U.S. reduction of its interest and roles in the world is another threat that encourages its enemies and retaliations from the dominant figures. Not all will be well if the country reduces its definitions of roles without ascertaining recurrent peace and stability in the regions that have been established as strongholds. Moreover, the U.S. intents to have a forward-learning strategy where vulnerability of the U.S. forces with maintenance of the U.S. commitment are established. The military activities and successes that have been enjoyed by the U.S. government are set to be integrated into a stable environment. The stable environment depicted has a palatable ground for activity within the region. Nonetheless, this risky undertaking can be successful with when the government makes defined commitments. Failure to live according to the commitments will be a threat to the U.S. security personnel.

References

Berman, I. (1/05/2012). Reading the Tea Leaves on Obama's New Military Strategy. Forbes.

Retrieved on 30 Jan. 13 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/ilanberman/2012/01/05/reading-the-tea-leaves-on-obamas-new-military-strategy/

Mahnken, T. G et al. (June 04, 2012). Asia in the balance: Transforming U.S. military strategy in Asia. American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved on 30 Jan. 13 from http://www.aei.org/papers/foreign-and-defense-policy/regional/asia/asia-in-the-balance-transforming-us-military-strategy-in-asia/