Discussion On The Rticle End The Opportunity Monopoly Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1126
Cite

¶ … Monopoly of Opportunity The concept of capitalism is often associated with concepts of free competition and opportunity and equal opportunity, where there is the ability of any firm to compete, and those with an entrepreneurial spirit may rise to the top of business and/or politics. In a recent article published by The Atlantic, Liu argues that the rather than providing opportunities equally, the system of capitalism seen in the U.S. constrains and exacerbates the existing economic, and therefore, social strata. The basic argument is that the rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer, effectivity creating an opportunity monopoly (Liu 1). The issue is not only associated with economic power but the way this is then impacting on and providing social power, including political power, as well as commercial power (Liu 1). By examining this article, and the underlying arguments, it is possible to appreciate the way in which ideas and concepts may different from the rhetoric when implemented in reality, and is present within the political environment as seen in the campaigns of both Trump and Saunders (Liu 1).

The concept of capitalism and the free market has its' basis in the idea of laissez faire, proposed by Adam Smith as the optimal approach to the market, where there was minimal state interference with the markets. The idea is that market forces will influence the markets to act in an efficient manner; so that adjustments would be made by suppliers in response to demand. Indeed, when looking at early America, Alexis de Tocqueville for capitalism in America is one which did not suffer from the same...

...

Effectively, although there was capitalism, he argued that the process had not resulted in crass individualism, seen with market capitalism in other areas. In Book II, Chapter 28, entitled Why among the Americans All Honest Callings Are Considered Honorable he stated "Among a democratic people, where there is no hereditary wealth, every man works to earn a living.... Labor is held in honor; the prejudice is not against but in its favour." Liu implies that this approach towards capitalism was seen in the United States for a period of time, referring to it as a "Tocquevillian ecology." However, it is argued that this model of capitalism is no longer present as power has become more concentrated.
The reason for this concentration is laid firmly at the door of capitalism, the way in which those who make money in the markets may pertain to prefer free competition, but in reality would be biased towards a monopoly if it were in their favour. Effectively, capitalists would be in favour of free competition if they were the competition rather than a dominant player. This creates a difficult scenario as companies seek to gain a dominant position. In the past anti-trust legislation has been effectively utilised to prevent organisations going to fast or too powerful, especially if it is by a process of acquisition or merger. However, in the modern society, the problem associated with disruptive technology has been its…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Liu, E. "End the Opportunity Monopoly." The Atlantic 2016. Web. <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/busting-opportunity-monopolies/473301/>.

de Tocqueville, A. "Why among the Americans All Honest Callings Are Considered Honorable," Tocqueville; Book II, Web. <http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/DETOC/ch2_18.htm>


Cite this Document:

"Discussion On The Rticle End The Opportunity Monopoly" (2016, May 16) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discussion-on-the-rticle-end-the-opportunity-2155697

"Discussion On The Rticle End The Opportunity Monopoly" 16 May 2016. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discussion-on-the-rticle-end-the-opportunity-2155697>

"Discussion On The Rticle End The Opportunity Monopoly", 16 May 2016, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discussion-on-the-rticle-end-the-opportunity-2155697

Related Documents

Monopoly Radical Treatise on Monopoly When a firm is the only seller or supplier of a good or a service for which there is no close substitute, it is referred to as a monopoly. Broadly speaking, every firm would naturally like to have a monopoly given that monopolies do not face competition. However, monopolists can only succeed in a market situation where the barriers to entry are very high (Brue & McConnell,

The OFT may then refer the companies to the Competition Commission (formerly known as Monopolies and Mergers Commission). The Competition Commission also plays a major role to investigate the situations which are called 'Oligopoly Situations' which involve explicit or implicit collusion between firms. Then the Competition Commission decides if the monopoly is acting against the public interest or not. And if they find a firm with a monopoly situation they

Both of these moves broke the monopoly. The Canadian government broke Bayer's monopoly and the second company moved into the market, creating a temporary oligopoly. The influx of Cipro from Mexico represented a substitute product, thereby breaking Cipro's American monopoly. This lowered the price of the drug until demand subsided -- note that it was demand that subsided and not supply. This despite the fact that the monopoly-granting patent protection

The lack of incentives or competitive pressures may lead monopolistic firms to neglect minimizing unit costs of production, i.e., to tolerate "X-inefficiency" (phrase coined by H. Leibenstein). Included in X- inefficiency are wasteful expenditures such as maintenance of excess capacity, luxurious executive benefits, political lobbying seeking protection and favourable regulations, and litigation" (Khemani and Shapiro, 1993). In all, monopoly is the economic state in which a single company produces a

A few years ago there were congressional hearings about the accusation against the larger airlines actively working to shut out any smaller newcomer to certain hubs around the world. While the ability and willingness of incumbent airlines to respond to competitive entry is central to competition, at some point that response may cross the line of fair competition and become an unfairly exclusionary practice intended to drive the entrant from the

Therefore, the change seen within the market structure Microsoft devotion high quality alive and strong. Still, there has been a decline of transactional costs in light of a broken up Microsoft. Before the change of business pattern, Microsoft held the monopoly and therefore capitalized on profit margins. Here the research shows that "Microsoft enjoys so much power in the market for Intel compatible PC operating systems that if it wished