Economics Of Business Strategy Coca-Cola's Essay


32). By contrast, PepsiCo benefitted from its wide product diversification. PepsiCo's product line includes popular snack names, while Coca-Cola has stuck to beverages. That has given PepsiCo the lead in overall sales, $43 billion to $31 billion in 2009 (see Dlugosch, 14 April 2010, p. 1). Question 4: Both companies' vertical involvement in their main global markets was determined by the consideration that contracts between soft-drink concentrate producers and bottlers allow the bottlers to have the last say in retail price, new packaging (but they could use only authorized packaging), selling and advertising in its territory (Martin, 26 March 2004, p. 5). This often causes strain on the relationships between bottlers, that very often are unable to produce and sell in large volumes, and the concentrate producer (Martin ibid). To accelerate revenue growth and be more agile and flexible both companies engage in vertical involvement in their main global markets have partially integrated into the bottling market. Coca-Cola's vertical involvement in their global markets is determined by the consideration to gain more control of manufacturing and distribution of its investment in North America to accelerate growth on the one hand and to convert "passive capital into active capital" on the other hand. An example for this strategy is the company's decision to buy the bulk of its largest bottler ("Coca-Cola Enterprises) (see Ali, 26 February 2010, p. 1). The parent company would buy struggling bottlers and resell them to CCE (see Martin, 26 March 2004, p. 2006). In 2010 and 2011, Coca-Cola acquired CCE's entire North American business. The rest of CCE, which consists of operations in several European countries, would remain independent and acquire Coke bottling operations in Scandinavia and Germany (Coke Near Deal For Bottler, 2009, p. 1). The Coca-Cola deal follows a similar move by closest rival PepsiCo, which announced in April 2009 that it aimed to subsume its two largest bottlers, "Pepsi Bottling Group" and "Pepsi Americas," to accelerate revenue growth and accomplish more flexibility. PepsiCo expects that the deal will allow it to have greater control over development, distribution and marketing of new products. PepsiCo's desire to own its own bottlers is also...


41). Coca-Cola -- having no snack-food line - began horizontally diversifying the company's beverage lines in 2004 (Sivy, 23 April 2007, p. 1). PepsiCo increased its horizontal portfolio by introducing snack foods products that are better for the health of the consumer and meet the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. The campaign called "Smart Spot" helped the snack division to succeed in these health-conscious times (see Badal, 2007, 37). Question 5: I think it is the different organizational structure that led both companies arrive at different answers to the question of how to maintain respectively reach the position of the number one seller of soda in the world. Coca-Cola's strength has always been in its organizational structure and it was consequent for the company to put all emphasis on improving this structure to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Pepsi-Co was hurt by the economic turndown and suffered not only from a flawed financial hedging strategy that left it paying too much for commodities and recent marketing disasters (see Pepsi gets a makeover, 25 March 2010, p. 2f.) but also from a bad reputation of selling unhealthy snack foods. To help the company's finances, Pepsi-Co decided in 2009 to acquire two independent firms that bottle its drinks and to raise its dividend announced by announcing a big share buyback. To overcome the wide-spread public image, that its high sugar, high salt and high fat snack-food products were harmful to the consumer health, Pepsi-Co on 2 March 2010 unveiled a series of targets to improve the healthiness of Pepsi's wares. The expectation is that integrating two bottling companies will bring greater control over an increasingly diverse drinks portfolio, and promote cross-marketing between the food and drink divisions while at the same time offering a broad repertoire of healthy snack products.
Reference List

Ali, T. (26 February 2010). The Coca-Cola Company to buy Coca-Cola Enterprises: Vertical Integration Continues. 1-4. Accessed 6 December 2011.

Badal, A. Coca Cola Company (2007). 33-40.

Please insert missing publication…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference List

Ali, T. (26 February 2010). The Coca-Cola Company to buy Coca-Cola Enterprises: Vertical Integration Continues. 1-4. Accessed 6 December 2011.

Badal, A. Coca Cola Company (2007). 33-40.

Please insert missing publication data.

Cite this Document:

"Economics Of Business Strategy Coca-Cola's" (2011, December 08) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from

"Economics Of Business Strategy Coca-Cola's" 08 December 2011. Web.23 April. 2024. <>

"Economics Of Business Strategy Coca-Cola's", 08 December 2011, Accessed.23 April. 2024,

Related Documents

Business Strategies Coca Cola Company Case Analysis Strategy Recommendation in Business The Coca Cola Company (Case Analysis) The Coca cola Corporation is among the most successful and well-known company in the globe. Its reputable existence is analyzed with its performance and efficient management. The company has dominated and controlled the beverage industry for many years, and has often proven its abilities in innovation, creativity and consumer satisfaction. The company has also set extremely high

Coca Cola Pricing Strategy Coca-Cola does not have one price all over the world and the reason behind this pricing strategy can be encapsulated in two main arguments: Not all countries in the world have a thriving economy The currency exchange rate can make all the difference Let us now understand what these arguments mean. If India ever followed the uniform pricing strategy all over the world, it would not only lose a large

Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies: The Coca-Cola Company Business level and corporate level strategies This paper analyzes the business-level and corporate-level strategies of the Coca-Cola Company in order to identify the most important strategies which have contributed to its success in the past and can help it in competing effectively in the long run. An analysis of its competitive environment has also been done in a view to assess and compare the strategies

Coca Cola in India Coca

Coca cola challenged this criticism and took assistance from the U.S. Embassy situated in India. For regaining its position in India, Sanjiv Gupta, a coca cola representative, did research and then showed the results to public through websites and advertisement. Sanjiv Gupta showed a great example of regaining the position of a brand after severe criticism. Coca cola fought bravely in this attack and openly communicated with the public. Future of coca

Coca Cola's Localization Strategy When most multinational corporations like Coca Cola enter foreign markets and implement localization strategy, they do it with reasons. As presented in the case, Coca Cola seeks to set up a corporate image. When it penetrates a local market, it replaces consumers' and government's collision. Implementation of corporate culture, personnel, marketing, and materials localization is useful in establishing the company's public image. The second reason is to

Coca-Cola Strategy

Coca Cola Summary of the Company Coca-Cola is a manufacturer and sometimes distributor of non-alcoholic beverages. The company was founded in 1886 in Atlanta, where the company is still based. It was concocted by John Pemberton, who then sold the product in soda fountains and pharmacies. The name comes from key ingredients, including cocaine and Kola nut, and the drink was initially marketed as a medical tonic. Coca-Cola was initially a syrup