EEOC According To Henderson 2006 Sex Discrimination, Essay

EEOC

According to Henderson (2006) sex discrimination, other blatant bigotry is a risky proposition for an organizational strategy. He wrote " of all the different kinds of legislation enacted in the past 70 years, laws barring discrimination in employment practices have placed the most pressure on human resources." In the case of Patricia Cosby, a35-year-old woman who has been repeatedly discriminated against throughout her 7 years at her company, this type of unfair treatment is best demonstrated to show how she can help defend herself. The purpose of this essay is to explain the legal protection that is entitled to Patricia and achieve justice from her unfair Employer.

According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) The Equal Pay Act is Patricia's best source of legal defense. In this federal law it states that "No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex."

It is up to Patricia therefore to prove that she has been discriminated against by her employer. She must prove that she has done equal work to her male counterparts while brandishing the same amount of skill and effort. This case may be difficult because the burden of proof rests with Patricia and she will need a well documented case that has substantial proof that prejudice was not a factor in her low pay.

References

Henderson, R.I. (2006). Compensation management in a knowledge-based world (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. " The Equal Pay Act of 1963." Viewed on 20 Oct 2013. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/epa.cfm

Cite this Document:

"EEOC According To Henderson 2006 Sex Discrimination " (2013, October 21) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/eeoc-according-to-henderson-2006-sex-discrimination-125267

"EEOC According To Henderson 2006 Sex Discrimination " 21 October 2013. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/eeoc-according-to-henderson-2006-sex-discrimination-125267>

"EEOC According To Henderson 2006 Sex Discrimination ", 21 October 2013, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/eeoc-according-to-henderson-2006-sex-discrimination-125267

Related Documents

The other effect of the discriminatory judicial system is that non-whites are usually targeted by the system in an unfair manner. For instance, Latinos are usually and in certain instances explicitly singled out for the process of immigration enforcement. Close to ninety-four percent of all the illegal immigrants who are arrested by the INS are of Mexican origin. The Immigration and Naturalization Service itself however states that only about fifty four

Discrimination in Workforce Gender discrimination at work place means the way to behave with the employees in such a way that is to prefer one employee to other due to gender biasness. All over the world, this disparity among the men and women is condemned but still present (Mooney, 2012). One of the research conducted at the U.S. shows that the women get lower compensation than the men do, for the

In the case considered, there are two possibilities for the award of the contract: The first is that there may have been no companies on the applicant list that met the minority standards. The second is that non-minority companies far outweighed their minority counterparts in the level of service that would be provided. In the first case, the deontological viewpoint would not have been applicable, as there were no companies

Discrimination against the elderly, against pregnant women, against women with children, against people of color are all prohibited under the law. The EEOC or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created to administer Title VII of the Civil Rights act and specifically to "progress race, national origin, religious, and sex discrimination claims pursuant to the statue" (Gregory, 2003). Is the EEC doing its job? During the first year alone after

Discrimination in the Fire Service Over time, nearly every profession once considered the exclusive province of men (and in the case of the United States, white men) has gradually been made accessible to minorities, whether through practical necessity, changing cultural standards, or court orders. However, this process has proceeded unevenly, so that even now there remains institutionalized discrimination which serves to preclude women and other minorities from the same opportunities as

But domestic violence has not been eliminated. Nor have other discriminatory traditions, such as polygamy. "Although the practice of polygamy is declining, it continues to be a threat to women, as it undermines a woman's dignity, perpetuates notions of male dominance, and above all creates domestic environments where women become vulnerable to abuse because they are in the difficult position of agreeing to their husbands' marriage or asking for