Verified Document

Establishing The Supreme Court Essay

¶ … U.S. Constitution Between 1777 and 1786, the Articles of Confederation determined what the federal government could and could not do (School of Law, n.d.). The Articles provided no authority for tax collection or regulation of commerce, a situation that left the states to fend for themselves amidst the often chaotic efforts to compete against one another. Without tax revenues, the federal government had no way to pay soldiers fighting in the Revolutionary War and many states ignored requests for financial contributions to the war effort. To resolve this issue, state representatives convened in Philadelphia to hammer out the U.S. Constitution, establish an executive and legislative branch for the federal government, and confer coercive power in order to enforce tax codes and interstate commerce regulations.

A third branch of the government, a federal judiciary, was also created during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia (Federal Judicial Center, n.d.). The Founding Fathers were only interested in establishing a Supreme Court, which left the issue of lower federal courts to be decided at a future date. The Justices were to be given tenure based on continued good behavior and a protected salary, which would create a political barrier between the judicial and the executive...

The wording establishing the federal judiciary was contained in Article III of the Constitution.
Article III has three sections (Federal Judicial Center, n.d.). The first section established a Supreme Court for the United States government and allowed leeway for Congress to establish lower federal courts. Section 1 prevents expulsion of Supreme Court Justices and lower court judges from their positions, as long as they conduct themselves appropriately. The salaries of Justices and judges are also protected as long as they remain in office, which must be paid in a timely fashion.

Section 2 of Article III describes the jurisdiction conferred to the federal judiciary, which includes everything the federal government could become involved in (Federal Judicial Center, n.d.). The federal judiciary was tasked with adjudicating disputes between states and citizens of states, determining the meaning and execution of treaties, and hearing cases involving the admiralty and maritime disputes. Section 2 also states that the Supreme Court will be the most senior body in the federal judiciary and can therefore hear appeals from the lower courts. Interestingly, Section 2 states that all criminal cases will be tried in front of a jury and in the state…

Sources used in this document:
References

Federal Judicial Center. (n.d.). History of the Federal Judiciary. Landmark Judicial Legislation: Constitution of the United States, Article III. Retrieved from http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/landmark_01.html.

Heritage Foundation. (2012). Punishment of Treason. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/3/essays/120/punishment-of-treason.

School of Law. (n.d.). The Constitutional Convention of 1787. University of Missouri, Kansas City. Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/convention1787.html.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Court Case Study
Words: 949 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case Study Every year Supreme Court provides decision in cases that really impact the American citizen's rights. The aim of this analysis is to keenly check cases handled by the Supreme Court and the way they were given their final verdict. The parties involved sometimes get that the cases favor them or not depending on the existing laws or even through undermining the constitution. The case in

Supreme Court's Recent Decision to Ban the
Words: 3326 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Supreme Court's recent decision to ban the execution of mentally challenged individuals raises important ethical issues. Judges must be able to determine if a person is indeed mentally challenged. While the legal system and psychology have made important insights into this issue, there is still some inconsistency in the definition and application of mental retardation in the judicial system. Accordingly, an analysis of the ethical principles underlying the issue

Supreme Court and Court
Words: 685 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Women on the Supreme Court: Do They Matter? At present, there have only ever been four women to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. If women and men are capable of coming to the same conclusions, the question emerges concerning whether it matters that there have been so few. To determine the facts, this paper discusses the gender composition of the Supreme Court and the extent to which, if any, that

Supreme Court and Injury Under the Law
Words: 666 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. LauferDeborah Laufer was a frequent litigant with physical disabilities and vision impairments, who brought a lawsuit against Acheson Hotels, alleging that Acheson Hotels failed to publish necessary information about their accessibility features on their website, which is a requirement under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The district court dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that Laufer lacked standing since she had no intention to visit

Supreme Court and the End of Segregation
Words: 670 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Jim Crow and the Segregation of SchoolsThe Jim Crow era lasted from after the Civil War, i.e., roughly around the late 19th century, to the mid-20th century in the United States. It was characterized by a series of policies at the state and local laws enforcing racial segregation, particularly in the Southern states. One of the most significant and pernicious aspects of this era was the segregation of schools, a

Judicial Self Restraint and Activism in Supreme Court Cases
Words: 1284 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Supreme Court opinions and dissents are essentially reflections of judicial self-restraint or judicial activism. Generally, the Supreme Court reflects judicial self-restraint or judicial activism through the use of the doctrine of standing in majority opinions and in dissenting opinions respectively. This implies that judicial self-restraint and judicial activism are terms in current legal language that describe opposite approaches that are taken by judges to interpret various issues relating to a

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now