Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The Importance of Appropriate Evaluation Models
Criminal justice policy and program evaluation is not a monolithic or standardized process. In other words there is no one size fits all approach to policy evaluation and assessment. Evaluation of policies designed to reduce domestic violence will be sharply different from those used to reduce rates of recidivism among juveniles. Therefore, when recommending a policy evaluation model, analysts should take into account situational variables, and especially the methods used to design and implement the applicable criminal justice policy. The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA, n.d.) describes evaluation in general as “a systematic, objective process for determining the success of a policy or program,” in order to determine whether that policy or program is achieving the goals it set out to achieve, or whether the program or policy has proven to be cost-effective (p. 1). In order to perform any type of policy evaluation, analysts first need to take into consideration the defined policy objectives, the appropriate measurements or indicators, and data collection and analysis methods (National Criminal Justice Association, n.d.).. The most common evaluation models include needs assessments, program theory assessments, process evaluations, impact evaluations, and efficiency analyses (“Criminal Justice Program Evaluation,”...
While all of these models are important can be used in conjunction with one another, the most relevant and applicable evaluation model is the impact evaluation. Impact evaluations remain relevant and applicable because they offer quantifiable data that can be extrapolated for various purposes.
Impact Evaluation
Impact evaluation is “the most common form” of criminal justice policy or program assessment (“Criminal Justice Program Evaluation,” n.d., p. 5). One reason why impact evaluations are common is that they yield quantifiable evidence that is helpful for determining whether criminal justice funds are being spent in an appropriate manner. Another reason why impact evaluations are appropriate is that they bridge the gap between theory and practice, showing that the policy or program actually does achieve measurable outcomes in accordance with the political or sociological goals. Moreover, the impact evaluation tends to accommodate for numerous types of policy designs. As Janeksela (1977) points out, “when there is a conflict between the evaluation design and the needs of the criminal justice system, the design will have to be changed,” (p. 1). Impact evaluation takes into account prior research such as needs assessment, and shows whether or not a policy fulfills those needs. If the policy…
References
Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA, n.d.). Guide to program evaluation. https://www.bja.gov/evaluation/guide/bja-guide-program-evaluation.pdf
Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84-94.
“Criminal Justice Program Evaluation,” (n.d.). http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/criminology/research-methods/program-evaluation/
Janeksela, G.M. (1977). An evaluation model for criminal justice. Criminal Justice Review 2(2): 1-11.
National Criminal Justice Association (n.d.). Program evaluation. http://www.ncjp.org/pretrial/outcome-and-performance-measures
Criminal Justice Policy Practice Determine Morality Higher Than Utilitarianism The passing and reformation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, also known as the so-called "crack law," is one of the most controversial pieces of legislation to be considered within the criminal justice system and its policy during the past two years. There are several aspects of this legal mandate that present a plethora of interesting situations and questions in regards to the
Ethical ConsiderationsEthical Considerations when Problem-Solving with Criminal Justice Policies and ProgramsIn solving problems, police officers and other members of the criminal justice system are confronted with various ethical challenges. When on active duty, five of the most common issues that actors in the criminal justice system face are: i) deciding the appropriate level of force to use during arrests, ii) protection of the rights of civilians while upholding the law,
In the experimental community, the researchers instituted a media campaign to increase seat-belt usage, followed by increased police enforcement of the seat-belt law. It was found that the percentage of drivers using seat belts increased in the experimental community but remained stable or declined slightly in the comparison community (Piquero and Piquero, 2002). An example of the before-and-after design would be the analysis of the impact of the Massachusetts Bartley-Fox
Policy Analysis: Interior Enforcement of the Employment of Immigrants Criminal Justice History of the Problem and Need for Change Problem Scope. In 2004, three U.S. companies were issued penalty notices by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for knowingly employing unauthorized workers (Porter, 2006). At the time, demographers estimated that six to seven million illegal immigrants were employed in the America -- that number is approximately equivalent to 5% of the U.S.
Criminal Justice - Research Methods Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics Online http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t200282010.pdf Respondents' concern over effects of illegal immigrants Gallup, Inc., The Gallup Poll [Online]. Available: http://www.gallup.com/poll/ 127649/Americans-Value-Aspects-Immigration-Reform.aspx [June 16, 2010]. Table adapted by SOURCEBOOK staff. Overall, the survey respondents indicate substantive concerns with the presence of illegal immigrants in the U.S. Three items relate to the overall question: (1) Unfair burden on U.S. schools, hospitals, and government; (2) Encourages other immigrants to move here illegally; (3)
Under the stewardship of Police Commissioner Howard Safir, the NYPD began analyzing daily crime statistics collected from its 40,000 officers throughout the five boroughs of New York City and generating computer modeling of crime trends in a system dubbed CompStat that allowed the accurate identification of crime trends with pinpoint accuracy, often permitting nearly as precise predictive modeling via extrapolation (Safir, 2003). The other main benefit and purpose of CompStat