People do not always perceive things that are actually there, and external stimuli can be convoluted with perceptions of memory and knowledge to distort perceptions. These facts are corroborated by original research proving that peripheral vision is not as valid as central vision. A host of readings also confirm these facts.
¶ … Visual Consciousness
Visual Perception
In conducting this study, the first step I took was to procure a book with a cover on it that I would attempt to read. I have read most of my books, but am unfamiliar with the text on the front of them. I actually selected one of my larger books (it is a coffee table book) in order to maximize my chances of reading. Next, I sat in a comfortable spot and entirely covered my left eye with my left hand. Once I was sure I could not see out of it, I fixated my right eye on a tiny crack in the wall. After doing so, I extended the book in my right hand as far to the right as I could, so that I could not even see it at first. Then, while maintaining my eye on the same crack, I slowly moved the book closer and closer to the point on the wall at which my eye was fixated. Eventually, I moved the book close enough to the spot my eye was fixated upon, at which point I was able to read the text on the front.
Reactions
It was a little difficult to remain fixated on the crack in the wall with my uncovered eye, but I was able to successfully do so. As I moved the book from outside of my point-of-view to inside it, I was able to denote fairly early on the sight of an object. Interestingly enough, all I could really make out was the color of the book, which was black. When I got it closer and closer to the point on the wall I was looking at, I was able to see that there was another color on that black. However, I could not readily identify what color it was (the text was printed in white), nor could I read it. All I could tell was that there was something else on the black background. When I got the book as close as I could to the spot I was fixated at, I could then see the color of the text. But I was not able to read it until I moved it to the spot I was looking at.
Relationship of Findings to the Readings
My research indicates that not only are there severe limitations to parafoveal processing, but also that assuming that parafoveal processing is reliable is an illusion. In this respect, the front end mental processes are circumscribed, which affects the more central ones related to decision making based on that information (Pashler and Johnson, no date). This concept is directly related to the readings regarding blindsight perception. Blindsight is "a kind of residual vision found in individuals who have suffered damage to striate cortex" (Brogaard, 2012, p. 595). There are congruencies between the restricted vision of blindsight patients and that involving parafoveal processing. My research indicates that anyone who claims to be able to use peripheral vision as proficiently as vision involving one's foveal is instead relying on "cognitive phenomenology but not…visual phenomenology" (Overgaard and Grunbaum, 2011, p. 1856). In both cases (those with blindsight and those with parafoveal-based sight) there is strong evidence that suggests that individuals claiming to perceive stimuli are merely guessing.
Additionally, it is notable that there are similarities in the limitations of peripheral vision and that of blindsight. Many of the properties regarding the book that I was able to discern prior to reading it are discussed within the readings. For instance, prior to being able to read the words on the book, I was able to distinguish some of its characteristics pertaining to its movement, shapes, and color, all facets that are discernible with blindsight (Overgaard and Grunbaum, 2011, p. 1855). The more important between the readings and my research, however, is that "an experience that represents a visually processed stimuli need not itself be visual" (Brogaard, 2012, p. 596).
Implications for Understanding Human Experience and Professional Practice
The implications of my research and the reading relate to the fact that there are many cognitive processes involved with stimuli, processing, and representations other than those involving the physical senses. These processes help to account for stimuli requiring selective attention, which in turn makes individuals conscious of things (Baars, 1997, p. 99). However, in some cases processing is related to more than one physical sense, such as what frequently occurs when individuals have visual impairment conditions such as prosopagnosia or achromatopsia, in which restricted vision is augmented by a host of other senses to help people identify characteristics and properties of objects (Celestia, 2010, p. 62). Therefore, it is apparent that perception of objects, particularly that involving sight, pertains to both sensory and extrasensory factors. Some of the more salient of the latter include experience, which is preserved within the mind in the form of memory.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.