Despite the fact that this caused her pain she kept seeing him because she needed his support. She is another character who wanted to overcome her social condition. )Maurer, 2000)
One might state that Jay lost Daisy because he went on with his life and his ambitions of acquiring an important social status and wealth. In the end he achieves what he wants, but he fails to be happy because he is not loved by the woman he desires. It is through all the possible means that the author demonstrates how richness and social status is nothing and how failed relationships and broken hearts destroy people's lives, regardless of the presence or the absence of the financial well-being. (Cummings)
The fact that the character's emotions are intertwined with their social aspirations makes the story even more complicated and contributes to its tragic ending. (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1578329/the_portrayal_of_1920s_society_in_the.html) Daisy for example was not in love with Tom, but it is safe to assume that at some point throughout their marriage she got attached to him, even if it was only because of all the things that he offered her. When Gatsby summons her to tell Tom that she had never loved him, she is unable to do it, a proof that her attitude was an ambiguous one. Ambiguity of feeling is another factor which contributes to the dramatic denouement of the story.
The only two people who seem to be far away from this sort of ambiguity are George and Jay. In a certain way their destinies are more tragic than the ones of the others. They both die because they loved women who in a manner or another were tied to Tom. Under these circumstances Tom becomes the author of their deaths, even if under an indirect form.
The only person who seems to be least affected by what goes on is Tom Buchanan. He is also the richest character, the least sensitive, the most arrogant, the most selfish. He is a hypocrite and probably the symbol of the social class he belongs to. At this point, ...
The importance of social status however is underlined throughout the entire story. The only party who seems to get out of the story undamaged is Tom. He seems to be in control of the destinies of the other characters and he is also the richest man in the story and this aspect is naturally not a coincidence. As far as Jay is concerned "The truth was that Jay Gatsby, of West Egg, Long Island, sprang from his Platonic conception of himself. He was a son of God -- a phrase which, if it means anything, means just that -- and he must be about His Father's business, the service of a vast, vulgar, and meretricious beauty. So he invented just the sort of Jay Gatsby that a seventeen-year-old boy would be likely to invent, and to this conception he was faithful to the end." (Fitzgerald)
Fitzgerald makes an interesting point regarding the relationship between love and marriage. The entire book is nothing else but a demonstration that one has nothing to do with the other. (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1578329/the_portrayal_of_1920s_society_in_the.html) People may fall in love with people but marry others because it is more convenient. The absence of love may be demonstrated by the behaviour of the spouses during marriage, but the institution of marriage is still maintained because in a certain manner this works in the best interest of the partners: "Your wife doesn't love you," says Gatsby. "She's never loved you. She loves me. . . . She only married you because I was poor and she was tired of waiting for me." (Fitzgerald) Those who really love are portrayed as being weak. Jay, George they are all described as victims.-Jay gets shot because of his feelings for Daisy while crazy with grief and despair George will kill the presumed lover of his wife and then kill himself.
Cummings, M.J. The Great Gatsby by F.S.K. Fitzgerald / 1896-1940). Retrived May 25, 2010 from http://www.cummingsstudyguides.net/Guides2/Gatsby.html#Gatsby
Fitzgerald, F.S. The great Gatsby. Scribner. 1999
Maurer, K. Cliff Notes. Fitzgerald's the great Gatsby. Cliff Notes. 2000
Parkinson, K. The great Gatsby (Penguin critical studies guide).Penguin Global. 2003
The portrayal of 1920s society in the Great Gatsby in Associated Content. Retrieved May 25, 2010 in http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1578329/the_portrayal_of_1920s_society_in_the.html
Great Gatsby Reading the highly-acclaimed novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby, is an excellent way in which to learn about New York City and about America in the 1920s through literature. Certainly there are scenes, characters and quotes that are exaggerated and enhanced beyond what the real world at that time represented -- which is the license that writers of fiction are afforded. But the big picture of The
Scott Fitzgerald and the Great Gatsby F. Scott Fitzgerald, born on the 24th of Sept 1896, was one of the greatest writers, who was well-known for being a writer of his own time. He lived in a room covered with clocks and calendars while the years ticket away his own career followed the pattern of the nation with his first fiction blooming in 1920s. "His fictions did more then report on
However, his single focus on getting Daisy's green light, something he cannot have, creates a motive of greed in Gatsby that he is unable to control and eventually destroys him. For example, Nick talks of Gatsby's idealization of Daisy by saying: "There must have been moments even that afternoon when Daisy tumbled short of his dreams -- not through her own fault but because of the colossal vitality of his
Characters in the Great Gatsby -- the American Dream A. Nick Carraway is the narrator in this novel and plays a very important role 1) Nick is the readers' source of description and information about the other characters, especially Gatsby, Daisy, 2) Nick is an honest person in the beginning of the novel, but the more he becomes involved in the relationships with Tom, Daisy and Gatsby, and through his romantic relationship
In this context, Tom is actually the one who lives his life in idleness, without giving it any meaning. Moreover, Daisy's superficiality makes of her an exponent of the consumerist world as well. Daisy makes a choice between the ideal, represented by Gatsby and the conventional stability offered by Tom, symbolizing materialism in general: "She wanted her life shaped now, immediately -- and the decision must be made by
Fitzgerald wrote his novel during the Roaring 1920s, but his book seems uniquely relevant to our own times. The Roaring 1920s was coming to a rapid slow-down of material prosperity, and questions of who was a 'real' American arose as social mobility had introduced individuals of new races and ethnicities into higher American society. Fitzgerald suggests that it is important to question what lies beneath the veneer of American society