Five Forces And Pharmaceuticals Case Study

Five Forces and Pharmaceutical Companies Pharmaceutical Companies spends many years and millions of dollars developing new drugs. In order for these companies to be successful they must sell any successful drug at a high price to attempt to regain some of the cost of the drug. Once other companies replicate the drug the cost of the drug can be driven down with competition. Most people use their insurance companies to pay for their drugs, pharmaceutical benefits management (PBM). The pharmaceutical companies try to make deals with the PBM, by offering them lower prices so that they would pressure doctors into writing those prescriptions. Below is the five forces that drives the pharmaceutical industry.

Supplier Power is where the pharmaceutical company that is supplying the medication controls the power because of the volume of demand. The supplier power is defined by many different aspects of selling a specified drug....

...

Usually once a drug is released on the market the company must sell as much of the drug possible to make the money it cost them to create the drug. The supplier power in that initial phase is defined by the cost of the drug and the amount of sale.
Threat of substitute is where the drug has been replicated. There is now other comparable drug on the market and therefore the original company no longer has the supplier power and they are now forced to lower cost of drug. Consumers must evaluate the substitute and choose the drug that has more benefits.

Buyer power is mainly defined by the choices available to the buyers. When there are alternative drugs on the market, the buyer usually have more power. The buyer sets the price because there are limited buyers and many producers.

Rivalry is derived from competition, which then brings profitability to zero. These companies become so competitive that…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Higgins, M. (2006). Stricter gift ethics urged for doctors; study sees influence on diagnosis. The Washington Times.

Porter, M.E. (2010). Strategic management. Retrieved from http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/porter.shtml


Cite this Document:

"Five Forces And Pharmaceuticals" (2011, January 27) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/five-forces-and-pharmaceuticals-121656

"Five Forces And Pharmaceuticals" 27 January 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/five-forces-and-pharmaceuticals-121656>

"Five Forces And Pharmaceuticals", 27 January 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/five-forces-and-pharmaceuticals-121656

Related Documents

Porter's 5 forces are threat of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, substitution threats and rivalry determinants. In my opinion, as a small food retailer, you can count disadvantages vs. major food retailers in all these categories. As such, first of all, entry barriers refer to such things as economies of scale, brand identity or access to necessary input information. As a small food retailer, you are

.....industries that are much more profitable than others. Per data from the BBC, there are two industries among five major ones that stand out (Anderson, 2016). Indeed, when looking at pharmaceutical firms, banks, car manufacturers, oil/gas refiners/sellers and the media, the first two of that list are clearly the best. The media does decently at about 12%, oil and gas does about 8% and carmakers are at about six percent.

There are two constant irritations in U.S. pharma companies' relationships internationally: Some developing nations, such as India, Brazil and South Africa, are chipping away at the patent situation, trying to shorten the time until the drugs can be brought out in generic form. The U.S. has supported high prices as the cost for innovation. Since other countries are not playing along, this means that their citizens are benefiting from the innovation paid

This relationship has an effect on the payment rates that CMS sets. Higher cost pharmaceutical therapies are systematically reimbursed below acquisition cost (i.e., the payment system is biased against full reimbursement for higher cost therapies). Reimbursement compared to acquisition cost for the top IO pharmaceuticals by total expenditures indicates that 9 of the 10 are significantly under reimbursed." Clinical Trials Report: Congress established Medicare beneficiaries numbering 40 million with a prescription

As a result, this protection was removed to increase the supply and ensure that the public has access to affordable drugs. ("Pharmaceutical Companies," n.d., pp. 97-99) Some of the negative implications of this decision are that there could be large amounts of generic drugs produced. This is because the various protections were removed to the point, that a number of players could begin manufacturing the medication. Over the course of

For example, before its paten ran out, "the price of Schering-Plough's top-selling allergy pill, Claritin, was raised thirteen times over fives years, for a cumulative increase of more than 50%, over four times the rate of general inflation." In 2002, the average price of the fifty drugs most used by senior citizens was approximately $1,500 for a year's supply, and although this refers to what the companies call the