As has been demonstrated in this study there are both manual and machinated methods used in signature analysis in the field of forensics. The proficiency of manual signature analysis has developed a methodology for checking the expertise of forensic examiners. There are many questions and considerations in conducting a signature analysis and this work too brief to be all inclusive in the techniques available today for use in forensic signature analysis.
Forensics: Signature Analysis
Forensic examination and analysis of writer identification and verification are reported as having "applications in various domains. Especially in the field of biometric recognition. Forensic Document Examination (FED) is a process that clarifies the writer of a handwritten document. Applications included are signatures verification. FED is such that is reported to have been based primarily on manual examination by experts with only recent automation of analysis methods being initiated.
State of the Art Systems
Two state of the art systems presently exist to "address the tasks of writer identification and verification" and include: (1) the system that uses Hidden Markov Models (HMMs); and (2) the system based on Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) to model a person's handwriting. (Sclapbach and Bunke, nd) In addition, there are reported to be "various feature selection methods applied to improve the performance of an existing off-line writer identification system. The performance of the system is significantly impro0vec by selected a good subset of the original feature set. The methods discussed can be potentially applied to any set of features and are thus not restricted to off-line handwriting." (Sclapbach and Bunke, nd)
III. Online Signature Analysis
On-line handwriting data requires the use of a GMM-based system for identification of the writer. It is reported that as a biometric, signature 'Has a number of properties that make it especially appealing. Signature is a behavioral biometric where the users is asked to perform a specific action. Therefore, it is impossible to be stolen and hard to be copied. A signature can be easily, inexpensively, and non-invasively captured. Especially as mobile devices such as smart phones, PDAs and Tablet PC's with built in support for pen input become widely spread, a signature can be acquired without any additional equipment at no cost. In a report on the performance of forensic document examiners in a signature comparison task that was designed to address the issue of expertise stated is "150 genuine and simulated questioned signatures were compared with a control group of non-examiner's opinions, and the results show that the expertise of the FEDs were statistically better than the control group at determining whether the questioned signatures were genuine. (Sita, Found, & Rogers, 2002) In another study, it is reported that proposed are "new machine learning strategies for person identification which can be used in several biometric modalities such as friction ridges, handwriting, signatures and speech. The biometric or forensic performance task answers the question of whether or not a sample belongs to a known person." (Srinivasan, Beal, & Srihari, 2005)
IV. Proficiency Skills of Forensic Experts
It is reported that a test of proficiency in the skill of Handwriting Identification has been developed by the Forensic Expertise Profiling Laboratory at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia. The testing program involves a two-part test. It is reported that for 2004, "in part one of the test 100 prepared questioned signatures had to be compared to a group of known signature specimens. In part two, given later in the year, questioned handwritten text had to be evaluated in comparison to known handwritten text. This would be similar to an anonymous note problem in casework. An additional test addressed questions of Line Sequence (which intersecting line was place above the other)." (Will, 2008) The report states that the known and questioned material was prepared by subjects drawn from "graduate students, staff members of the university, and the general public. The writers might be instructed to write normally, to disguise their writing, to simulate the writing of other writers, and to simulate their own writings." (Will, 2008) Tests were varied in format and content. The report states that the first year of test participation is "a baseline year." (Will, 2008)
V. Revealing What is Hidden in Documents
Documents often are hiding information and one example is the completely 'blank' slip of papers such as is shown in PowerPoint Slide number 3. Ink that fades until it is invisible leaves traces seen only when it reacts to Ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) radiation. The blank slip of papers is reported to have been placed in the VSC-4 (Video Spectral Comparator). The result reveals the information that could not be seen by the naked eye. (Will, 2008, paraphrased)
VI. Important Questions to Be Addressed
There are important questions that must be addressed when conducting signature analysis and these include the questions that are listed in the PowerPoint Presentation on pages 3 through 6 and specifically those as follows:
1) Is the signature genuine?
2) Is the document simulated/traced, and if so is it simulated/traced by a particular person?
3) Is the same person the author of several documents?
4) Which of a group of people wrote an anonymous letter?
5) Did someone guide a person's hand as a will was signed?
6) Did the doctor come back later and alter the medical records?
7) Did the signer of the document also initial the changes?
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.