Verified Document

Fourth Amendment Concerns Essay

Public Safety vs. Individual Rights The balance between public safety and individual rights is a delicate one. Assuring public safety as well as privacy and freedom from unnecessary harassment and security procedures is usually not all that hard to pull off but there are situations and instances where it can be very dicey. Easy examples that come to mind are political events, DUI checkpoints and so forth. Some say all the stops should be pulled out in such events and/or that no better options exist. Other people decry and condemn anything that infringes upon the rights or convenience of those that are not doing anything wrong. While not the cleanest solution, the balance that must be struck is somewhere in the middle and it is rare that all sides are placated and left with no complaints.

Analysis

One dimension of the public safety vs. personal rights debate is the question of who has the authority to stop, frisk, search and otherwise infringe on the rights of others to move about and do things as they please. Government officials and policy are generally given much more leeway than private citizens and security personnel as the former typically has arrest and/or prosecutorial powers while the latter hardly ever do. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, any citizen can intervene at their discretion when a felony is in progress by either doing what they can to stop the crime in progress or at least report the crime to the proper government authorities...

However, when guilt or innocence is less certain and more ambiguous, what a private citizen, including a security guard, can do gets a lot murkier and can vary literally from county to county, from city to city and from state to state. There are also federal standards that can come into play depending on the situation and location (OGE, 2014).
When looking at the same dichotomy through a search and seizure perspective, the opposite is usually true. Governmental organizations, including police, are generally bound by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution but the same is not true of private businesses and security personnel so long as they do not cross certain lines. Private businesses would be well within their rights to secure and search their own premises and computers and even private businesses generally have the right to search areas and/or verify receipts and such. However, both groups are bound by limitations that unduly limit privacy and/or freedom of movement. Government agencies can detain someone in most cases but a security person or private citizen has to have a legally allowable reason to do so. Otherwise, a private citizen could be on the hook for a false imprisonment charge. For people in the public areas and not on private property, there generally has to be cause for search or seizure no matter who is trying to do the searching or why they…

Sources used in this document:
References

Crime Doctor. (2014, July 2). CRIME DOCTOR. Use of Force, Security Guards, use of force, Chris McGoey, security guards expert. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.crimedoctor.com/use-of-force.htm

Nolo. (2014, July 2). Search and Seizure Principles - Nolo.com. Nolo.com. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/search-seizure-principles

Nolo. (2014, July 2). Your Employees' Right to Privacy - Nolo.com. Nolo.com. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/employee-privacy

OGE. (2014, July 2). Statutes. U.S. Office of Government Ethics. Retrieved July 2,
2014, from http://www.oge.gov/Laws-and-Regulations/Statutes/Statutes/
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Fourth Amendment Issues and the
Words: 813 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

The NSA had been illegally investigating several journalists and even violating their privacy by monitoring their telephone use through systems and capabilities designed for use against terrorist suspects only. Fourth Amendment constitutional rights prohibit any such use of surveillance without judicial authorization, typically, a search warrant or wire tap warrant issued after a formal presentation of evidence and the establishment of probable cause, as required by the original text of

Fourth Amendment Interpretations in Justice
Words: 1382 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

AbstractThis article offers a review of Fourth Amendment interpretive law, with a focus on evolving exemptions to the exclusionary law as well as how social media had impacted interpretations of unreasonable searches and seizures and citizens’ privacy rights.Criminal Justice Investigations: The Fourth AmendmentThe Fourth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,” by protecting them “against unreasonable searches

Open Field Doctrine the Fourth Amendment Is
Words: 3944 Length: 12 Document Type: Research Paper

Open Field Doctrine The Fourth Amendment is one of the most important and hotly contested and debated amendment within the Bill of Rights to the United State Constitution. Many people focus on the First and Second amendment. The Fourth Amendment, when discussed, usually comes up when speaking of house/car searches and whether warrants are needed and how they can and should be procured. Interpretations of the Fourth Amendment have led to

4th Amendment Search and Seizure
Words: 1995 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Paper

Fourth Amendment The United States, as a society, is based upon principles of which other nations in today's world can only dream. Most Americans are proud to admit their heritage, their citizenship, their identity. This "americanness" is fostered by various values that we hold, as well as by the documents that have literally formed our country. One such document is the United States Constitution, amended by the Bill of Rights. The amendments

Criminal Investigation and the Fourth
Words: 1564 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. Congress are slowly coming to the realization that they will have to address this issue which the Bush administration left behind to muddy the waters of citizen privacy rights in combination with the cases that are presently awaiting an appeal in the appeal courts throughout the United States due to violation of their rights to privacy during search and seizures arrests. Bibliography Panetta, Toni

First Amendment, the Constitution, and the Supreme
Words: 2383 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

First Amendment, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court Freedom of and from religion and freedom of speech are the distinct provisions of the First Amendment; it gives citizens of the United States the unalienable human right to assembly and speech. However, the language is intentionally vague. The framers of the Constitution, anticipating unknown applications of the amendment, gave power to the Supreme Court to act as ultimate arbiter in matters

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now