Bhagwati says, "But today's most dramatic change is in the degree to which governments have intervened to reduce obstacles to the flow of trade and investments worldwide (p. 11)." He emphasizes to make this next point, which is: Bhagwati's concerns about governments redirecting globalization is a valid concern, just as are American's concerns with loss of jobs. However, most Americans are not looking at the long-term picture: they are going into taxpayer debt by way of America's taxpayer philanthropy in third world nations. To bring those countries into the global market and free trade will serve the American taxpayer well in the future.
But this fact forces upon our attention a disturbing observation: governments that can accelerate globalization can also reverse it. Herein lies a vulnerability that cannot be dismissed complacently. The earlier globalization, in the end, was interrupted for almost a half century with rising trade barriers epitomized (p. 11)."
The warning is, of course, as a result of recent "discoveries" by those colonizing countries that unskilled labor is being "outsourced" to third world countries; and the citizens of countries like America, where the unskilled labor jobs have been the bread and butter of America's middle class almost since the birth of America, are becoming very nationalistic and loud about work being outsourced to third world countries (Krishnan, 2007, p. 2189).. It is a subject that has been addressed to win the middle class vote by current candidates in America's 2008 election campaigns.
Jayanth K. Krishnan (2007) says:
The issue of outsourcing jobs abroad stirs great emotion among Americans. Economic free-traders fiercely defend outsourcing as a positive for the U.S. economy, while critics contend that corporate desire for low wages, alone, drives this practice. In this study Professor Krishnan focuses on a specific type of outsourcing, one which has received scant scholarly attention to date -- legal outsourcing. Indeed, because the work is often paralegal in nature, many see the outsourcing of legal jobs overseas as no different from other types of outsourcing. But by using case studies of both the United States and India, the latter of which is receiving an ever-increasing amount of outsourced American legal work, Professor Krishnan describes how there are many forms to the legal outsourcing model and how this practice can entail a range of legal services (p. 2189)."
To this extent, globalization is bringing India into the modern world, reducing its levels of poverty, because, even in India, work is outsourced from urban to rural areas (Shurmer-Smith, 2000, p. 60). Talking about globalization and outsourcing within India, Pamela Shurmer-Smith says:
Urban poverty is intimately connected with rural poverty. As a consequence, so long as there is greater economic growth in the towns than in the villages, economic growth will not lead to increased wages for urban workers. Urban poverty declines only when there is a growth in regulated labour intensive industries, but, as Mitra (1992) shows, the tendency has been towards investment in high productivity, capital intensive industry with ancillary outsourcing of labour intensive production in the informal sector, where wages are driven down by the excess of available unskilled and semi-skilled labour (p. 60)."
At least in the modern sense, we see that globalization is working towards the creation of a balance of earning ability amongst the third world nations' poor. However, it is important, too, to heed Bhagwati's warning, that governments that can direct the forces of globalization, can change that direction too. Currently, there is ...
Clearly the topic of globalization will remain a hot subject around the world, but it is very probable that there is no way to stop globalization. Timothy Taylor (2005) says that Americans' concerns that outsourcing is at the source of their current economic woes is not a valid argument against outsourcing (p. 367). He says:
The best news for the U.S. economy in recent years has been its extremely strong productivity growth. Measured by output per hour in the business sector, productivity growth was 4.4% in 2002, 4.3% in 2003, and 3.9% in 2004 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, giving this period three of the best four years for productivity growth since 1971 (the other year in the top four was 1992). Producing more per hour is how an economy raises the average standard of living over time. U.S. firms have generated this remarkable productivity growth in large part by taking advantage of the gains in information and communications technology -- and outsourcing is one mechanism by which this has happened. The practice of outsourcing both to domestic and foreign firms allows businesses to harness dramatic innovations in communications and information technology more effectively than they could if they just gave each of their own payroll-department employees a fancy new computer. Instead of every firm individually needing to learn how to run an expensive computerized system for collecting job applications, mailing paychecks, and offering choices of employee benefits, these services can now be provided by firms with core competencies in these areas (p. 367)."
Outsourcing is synonymous with the goals of globalization, and it is not likely that, even given Bhagwati's warning, that globalization will reverse itself by trend or that it will be reversed by governments.
Bhagwati, J. (2004). In Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=103179054
Channa, S.M. (2004). Globalization and Modernity in India: A Gendered Critique. Urban Anthropology & Studies of Cultural Systems & World Economic Development, 33(1), 37+. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5006501843
Krishnan, J.K. (2007). Outsourcing and the Globalizing Legal Profession. William and Mary Law Review, 48(6), 2189+. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5020807564
Shurmer-Smith, P. (2000). Globalization and Change. London: Arnold. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=99191342 www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5012081601
Taylor, T. (2005). In Defense of Outsourcing. The Cato Journal, 25(2), 367+. Retrieved…
Bhagwati's concerns about governments redirecting globalization is a valid concern, just as are American's concerns with loss of jobs. However, most Americans are not looking at the long-term picture: they are going into taxpayer debt by way of America's taxpayer philanthropy in third world nations. To bring those countries into the global market and free trade will serve the American taxpayer well in the future.
Globalization has become a ubiquitously word in the last few decades. Much of the globalization trend is driven by the fact that many organizations operate internationally and supply chains have become sophisticated, complex, and spans the entire globe. As a result of globalization, many organizations have tried to proactively create a level of homogenization and standardization internationally of markets, resources, and labor. When international companies can have access to foreign
Globalization arguably began even before Marco Polo’s expeditions, possibly being traceable to Alexander the Great’s establishment of overland routes between Eastern Europe and India. The assumption that globalization equals Americanization is profoundly arrogant, and is also ignorant of the history, meaning, and implications of globalization. Globalization implies integration and interdependence of the world. Predating the United States of America, globalization nevertheless reached a peak in the 20th century, when a
That said, Goodhart believes that global governance, if pushed too far into sovereign nations' doings, can in fact undermine popular sovereignty as "a viable conception of democracy" but it is not doing that and in fact, in a globalized world that is increasingly interdependence needs a new kind of democracy. The new sovereigntists' views are normative while Goodhart's are more along the lines o positivism. Basically, Goodhart argues that
Globalization's Effect on the United States' National Security Objective of this paper is to explore the impact of globalization on the United States national security. The study defines globalization as the increasing global relations of people, corporate organization and government. There is no doubt that the globalization provides numerous benefits to the American economy. Despite the benefits derived from the globalization, the advent of globalization also provides some threats to the United
Globalization and National Security While the economic benefits of globalization have been frequently discussed, the very serious national security vulnerabilities which have arisen as a result of increase interconnections, both economically and socially, has garnered much less attention. The current literature on globalization either omits national security discussions entirely, or conducts them from a relatively myopic perspective The 2010 National Security Strategy attempts to rectify this, but its seems to have little effect
These companies are getting bigger and bigger. Some companies have such huge assets all over the world that they are worth more than many small countries. If you compare the GDP of many countries, you can see that the GDP is even less than the earnings of those big companies (Disadvantages of globalization, 2012). The governments do not have the power to stop the multinational companies from closing a factory