Government Contracting Process The Federal Thesis

(Vancketta, 1999) The 'Changes' clause enables the Government "to make unilateral changes to the contract during performance, so long as those changes fall within the contract's scope."

The Standard 'Changes' clause utilized in fixes price supply contracts allows the CO to make changes in writing to:

1) the drawings, designs, or specifications when the item is being specifically manufactured for the government;

2) the method of shipment or packing; or 3) the place of delivery. [Far 52.243-1] (Vancketta, 1999)

The 'constructive change' doctrine allows informal government actions or inactions not initially identified or admitted to be changes - but which require extra work - by the CO may nonetheless constitute changes." (Vancketta, 1999) Stated as typical categories of constructive changes that have been recognized by the administrative board of contract appeals and the courts are those as follows:

1) informal extra work directives;

2) defection government specifications or impossibility of performance;

3) incorrect contract interpretations taken by the Government causing extra work; and 4) the failure of the government to cooperate during performance. (Vancketta, 1999)

The standard default clause is similar to the 'termination for cause' in that the government is permitted to terminate a contract for default in the case where the contractor breaches the contract as follows:

1) fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in the contract;

2) make progress, thereby endangering performance of the contract; or 3) perform any other material provision in the contract. [FAR 52.249-8(a)(12)] (Vancketta, 1999)

FAR Part 31 states for the cost principles which relate "when and to what extent costs can be recovered under a government contract." Costs recovered by contractors must be:

1) allowable;

b) allocable; and reasonable. (Vancketta, 1999)

Reasonable costs are stated to be labeled so if "in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business." [FAR 31.201-3] an 'allocable' cost is defined as one which "is assignable or chargeable to one of more cost objectives on the basis of relative benefits received or other equitable relationship." (Vancketta, 1999) Requirements under non-commercial item government contracts required compliance with the following:

1) FAR's 'cost principles;

b) the Cost-Accounting Standards; and the 'Truth in Negotiations Act' (Vancketta, 1999)

The contractors are required to make sure that no false claims are made in their billing statement and conflicts of interest are strictly prohibited under 41 U.S.C. Section 423-, and 19 U.S.C. Section 208(a). Contractors are required...


(Vancketta, 1999)
Kickbacks are strictly prohibited in either the giving or receiving of the same for the purpose of "improperly obtaining or rewarding favorable treatment in connection with a federal contract or subcontract" under 41 U.S.C. Sections 51-58; FAR 3.502. Kickbacks include "money, fees, commission, credits or any type of compensation." (Vancketta, 1999) Favorable treatment includes "obtaining unwarranted waivers of deadlines, and obtaining acceptance of non-conforming goods" (Vancketta, 1999)


This work has reviewed the government contracting process in which contractors bid upon government jobs that are published and announced and has related the various requirements and restrictions relating to government contracting. It is important that the contractor or company that is bidding on the government announced job be aware of the various rules, regulations and requirements of the government prior to bidding on government contracting jobs.


How to Register as a Federal Contractor (2008) online available at

Small Business Guide to Federal Contracting

Government Contracting

Federal Government Contract Overview

Government Contracting 101

Guide to Government Contracting - Kentucky

Limits of Competition: Accountability in Government Contracting 1 Jun 2003 Yale Law Journal.

Benford, Ceclia M. (2006) Contract Incentives. Unclassified. Online available at (,+cost+plus+fixed+fee+(CPFF),+cost+no+fee+(CFE)+cost+plus+incentive+fee&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

Vancketta, Carl. L. (1999) Federal Government Contract Overview. Findlaw Information Governance Resource Center. Online available at

Government Contracting Process

Cite this Document:

"Government Contracting Process The Federal" (2008, October 14) Retrieved April 14, 2024, from

"Government Contracting Process The Federal" 14 October 2008. Web.14 April. 2024. <>

"Government Contracting Process The Federal", 14 October 2008, Accessed.14 April. 2024,

Related Documents

("Bender," 2010) Evaluate how Public Policy Decisions Affect the Receipt of Revenues Politics and attitudes about where the various revenues should be spent can create heated amounts of debate. In the case of the Department of Defense, this can mean that periodic reviews could occur that can have an impact upon a host of different spending programs. At the same time, various assessments will take place with Secretary of Defense. Where,

Procurement in Government Contracting The government procurement process is identified by purchase of goods and services that will be used in provision of public goods and services like transport, railway, education, health, defense etc. It is not easy to qualify as a supplier to the government bodies since it needs to comply with quality standards. However, this might not be possible for small and disable-owned businesses. In order to offer these

Acquisition of Innovative Technology and Weapon Systems Government contracting plays a critical role in the acquisition of innovative technology for different departments such as the Department of Defense (DoD). Over the past few years, DoD has enhanced its development and acquisition of innovative weapon systems to enhance its effectiveness and efficiency. However, the conventional government contracting process is characterized by challenges resulting in delays and significant costs for taxpayers. This issue

The protester then has an opportunity to file written comments on the report. Utilizing Debriefings to Prevent Bid Protests Officially, Post-Award debriefings are meant to provide transparency to the unsuccessful candidates. Although the prescribed requirements of the briefings are very rigid and formal, agencies should resist the temptation to meet the bare minimum required by the formalities. Agencies should pay special attention to Requirement 1, the "evaluation of the significant weak

Small Business Government Contracting CEO of Small Business that Provides Service Expansion by Competing for Navy Contracts at a Base Several Miles Away The objective of this study is to examine the scenario of a CEO of a small business that provides a service and business expansion through competing for Navy contracts at a base several miles away. This work will: (1) Determine how the federal government encourages small businesses and how

Performance-Based Contracting Since federal contracting began, the federal government has continuously sought ways to manage and more efficiently execute the contracting process. The enduring goal is to achieve maximum effectiveness and ensuring the desired contract outcomes are reached by the contracted party. One tool to achieve this end is the Performance-Based Contract introduced in the early 1990's as a child of Performance Based Acquisition (PBA). This paper will discuss the history