Government Procurement Process By Which Term Paper

Length: 7 pages Sources: 4 Subject: Government Type: Term Paper Paper: #98135952 Related Topics: Protest, Legislative Process, Procurement, Government Contracts
Excerpt from Term Paper :

The protester then has an opportunity to file written comments on the report.

Utilizing Debriefings to Prevent Bid Protests

Officially, Post-Award debriefings are meant to provide transparency to the unsuccessful candidates. Although the prescribed requirements of the briefings are very rigid and formal, agencies should resist the temptation to meet the bare minimum required by the formalities. Agencies should pay special attention to Requirement 1, the "evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the offeror's proposal" because the evaluation is open-ended, unlike Requirements 2-3, which contain definite numerical standards, and Requirement 4, which only requires a simple summary. Open-ended evaluations can vary greatly in quality and also increase the opportunities for the agency to make a mistake.

If it is a particularly confusing or shallow evaluation, an unsuccessful offeror might take issue with the soundness of the agency's decision and later move to Protest the Bid by claiming that the evaluation demonstrated unsound judgment or unfair treatment. Because Bid Protests to the Government Accountability Office receive an automatic stay of performance, even a weak protest could delay a project significantly.

Because of the disruptive potential of Bid Protests, Agencies should use debriefings as an opportunity to resolve any lingering grievances and remove any ammunition that the unsuccessful offeror may have for protesting the bid. Agencies can accomplish this by doing very thorough evaluations which anticipate and address likely grievances from unsuccessful offerors. Rumbaugh recommends that "the debriefings provide offerors with positive, constructive, and comprehensive feedback, demonstrating that the government is interested in their future success."

Offerors should "feel as if they've gotten the "complete story" about their evaluation."


Although bid protests are very annoying the average agency, they seem to have achieved their purpose by promoting agency hyper-compliance with source selection procedures, thereby reducing opportunities for corruption and misconduct among agencies. Because bid protests are costly to both the agency and the contract winners, the mere threat of protest provides incentives for agencies to "design and operate source-selection processes that are transparent in terms of promoting compliance with the law; fair in terms of access to contracting opportunities; and effective in terms of responsiveness to Congressional preferences."

Thus, as long as agencies remain diligent and focused in compliance, the legislative purpose of the bid protest system, and of the source selection system, will be fulfilled.


Federal Acquisition Regulation Source Selection Statute 15.3

Acquisition Community Connection

ACQ Center (2003) Source Selection: Common Myths and Misconceptions NIH AMC Symposium Nov. 9, 2004

Maser, S.M., Subbotin, V., & Thompson, F. (2010) The GAO's Bid-Protest Mechanism: Effectiveness and Fairness in Defense Acquisition? Working Paper Atkins School of Management Willamette University. Available at

Rumbaugh, M.G. (2010) Understanding Agency Contract Source Selection. Vienna: Management Concepts

GAO Office of General Counsel...


Sixth Edition, 1996 GAO/OGC-96-24

United States Government Accountability Office - Office of General Counsel (2009)Bid Protests at GAO:A Descriptive Guide Ninth Edition GAO-09-471SP

Shrewsbury, J.M. (2010). U.S. Government Source Selection, "Best Value" Process. NCMA Aloha Chapter.

Best Value/Tradeoff Process

Source Selection Guide

Paper: Each student is required to write a paper on a selected topic. Students should use the 5th Edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) as a guide for citing references. Each paper must be between 5 and 10 pages in length (double spaced, 12 point print, with Times New Roman font). Standard margins should be used. Students will choose their own topics but may elicit suggestions from others. Topics should relate to a current Procurement Law issue or controversy. Please post your topic onto Discussions area. Your professor will approve your topics no later than 6pm on Saturday of Week 4.

Papers will be graded as follows: Spelling and grammatical errors will be noted, but grades will be based on each paper's content. Papers that argue the author's central premise in a clear and logical fashion will receive high marks. Papers that fail to take a position (or fail to effectively argue the author's central point) will not do well prepare a research paper on the importance of following the process of the Soource Selction to prevent Protest. This paper should explain the Source Selection process and speak on how when properly apply prevent protest and all for the source selection team to make the right decision on which bidder is the best value for the agency.

I need an outline of the paper on 24 SEP 2011 but the actual paer will be due at a later date. Please advise if this can be done.

Customer is requesting that (writergrrl101) completes this order.

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 5)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 2)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 7)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 8)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 6)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 11)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 12)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 13)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 15)

(Shrewsbury, J.M., 2010, p. 16)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 425)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 22)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 22)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 25)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 25)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 21)

(FAR Part 15)

Source Selection Guide 27 (?

Source Selection Guide 27; (?


Best Value Process,

(Maser, S.M., 2010, p. 4)

(Maser, S.M., 2010, p. 4)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 425)

(GAO 21.0(a)(1))

(GAO - Office of General Counsel, 2009, p. 7)

(GAO - Office of General Counsel, 2009, p. 6)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 425)

(Rumbaugh, M.G., 2010, p. 427)

(Maser, S.M., 2010, p. 5)

Sources Used in Documents:


Federal Acquisition Regulation Source Selection Statute 15.3

Acquisition Community Connection

ACQ Center (2003) Source Selection: Common Myths and Misconceptions NIH AMC Symposium Nov. 9, 2004

Maser, S.M., Subbotin, V., & Thompson, F. (2010) The GAO's Bid-Protest Mechanism: Effectiveness and Fairness in Defense Acquisition? Working Paper Atkins School of Management Willamette University. Available at

Cite this Document:

"Government Procurement Process By Which" (2011, September 27) Retrieved June 22, 2021, from

"Government Procurement Process By Which" 27 September 2011. Web.22 June. 2021. <>

"Government Procurement Process By Which", 27 September 2011, Accessed.22 June. 2021,

Related Documents
Government Contracting Process the Federal
Words: 2271 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 79293492

(Vancketta, 1999) The 'Changes' clause enables the Government "to make unilateral changes to the contract during performance, so long as those changes fall within the contract's scope." The Standard 'Changes' clause utilized in fixes price supply contracts allows the CO to make changes in writing to: 1) the drawings, designs, or specifications when the item is being specifically manufactured for the government; 2) the method of shipment or packing; or 3) the place

Procurement Specifications: The Procurement Process Usually Requires...
Words: 622 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 68258756

Procurement Specifications: The procurement process usually requires crucial planning based on the complexity and size of the specific procurement. The process involves generating and reviewing requirements and specifications for procurement. Generating and reviewing these requirements and specifications is geared towards ensuring effective planning. The most appropriate process for generating and reviewing procurement specifications would include defining the outcome, defining specifications, identifying risks, researching the procurement market, and preparing a business case

Government Outsourcing the Outsourcing of
Words: 10988 Length: 35 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 19825907

A micro considers the interests and rights of the individual company as the primary concern. Both of these views are valid depending on the lens that one wishes to use. The problem arises when the government is forced to develop policies regarding procurement in this volatile debate. The government must decide whether to take a micro view, favoring the rights of companies, or a macro view that places the

Procurement in Government Contracting
Words: 2559 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 46120568

Procurement in Government Contracting The government procurement process is identified by purchase of goods and services that will be used in provision of public goods and services like transport, railway, education, health, defense etc. It is not easy to qualify as a supplier to the government bodies since it needs to comply with quality standards. However, this might not be possible for small and disable-owned businesses. In order to offer these

Federal Procurement Process Highly Publicized Incidents Such
Words: 1369 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 36003860

Federal Procurement Process Highly publicized incidents such as the federal government purchasing at $500 hammer or $2,500 toilet seat continue to capture headlines as examples of a federal procurement process gone awry, but these notorious examples have become few and far between in recent years, due in large part to significant reforms such as the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 that minimized some of these problems. Despite these substantive

How Do the Non-For Profit NFP Organizations Manage Their Procurement...
Words: 6916 Length: 20 Pages Topic: Business - Management Paper #: 39302164

picture of how nonprofit organizations balance their procurement processes by applying a phenomenological method to investigate the procurement methods, by categorizing the knowledge of participants. This involved the analysis of survey results in order to pinpoint the fundamental challenges that nonprofits face in conjunction with finding a means of improving the procurement processes. This was an investigation founded on an intensified approach to epistemology. Other models, such as the