Hba And The Building Trade The Liabilities Of A Professional Association Term Paper

Related Topics:

Non-Profit and for-Profit Ethical and Liability Issues This paper examines the ethical and liability issues that non-profit corporations and for-profit businesses face, and compares them.

Non-Profit Corporations and For-Profit Business: A Comparison of the Ethical and Liability Issues that are Faced by Both There have been a lot of scandals lately regarding large for-profit businesses. These scandals stem from both ethical and legal issues. Many of these scandals have resulted in lawsuits and even criminal proceedings against those who have been involved with them. The true extent of corporate liability is just beginning to be seen in our society. We are watching the large corporations of this country ever more closely now, in order to make sure that they are acting in an ethical manner. The corporations, for their part, are being extra careful in their actions and words, fully aware of the liability that they are under should anything they say or do slip out of the socially acceptable line. With all of the focus on the ethics and liability of large corporations in our nation, the question naturally arises of how much of this, if any, applies to non-profit organizations. Do non-profits have the same ethical standards to adhere to as for-profit companies do? Do non-profits perhaps have a different set of ethical practices that they must follow than do for-profits? Do non-profits experience liability to the same extent as for-profit companies do? This paper compares ethical and liability issues of both non-profit and for-profit companies.

While it may seem as if non-profit organizations should not receive as much public scrutiny as for-profit companies -- after all, non-profits are in the business of helping people, and not to make money, as for-profits are -- the fact is that there is just as much potential for corruption in a non-profit corporation as there is in a for-profit one. This realization really hit the public hard in the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. Following these attacks, Congress began to give non-profit organizations the same deep scrutiny it always gave for-profits, in order that the trusting public and those in need would not be bilked by unscrupulous and phony charities.

Because of this newfound concern regarding the potential corruptibility of non-profits, many non-profits are adopting their own ethical standards, while some national associations that oversee several non-profits are coming up with standards of ethical practices for those non-profits in their care. Further, there are a good number of charity watchdog groups that now exist that have as their aim keeping charities honest in their dealings with the public. While we would all like to think that charities all have high ethical standards, as their purpose is philanthropic, it must be realized that charities are only as ethical as the people who run them. Many an unscrupulous person, or board of directors, have looked at the donations they were bringing in for the charity as their own personal money pool, or have used the donations for purposes the donors did not want or did not know about. The new standards for ethical practices that are being adopted by many charities and associations nationwide are meant to keep these things from happening.

Then there are the liability issues that many non-profits today are facing. In today's culture, no company, private or public, can afford to ignore liability issues. Present and former employees, donors, volunteers, board members, even recipients of funds from non-profit organizations can all be potential sources of lawsuits. Lawsuits can cost a non-profit hundreds of thousands of dollars, something which can destroy the entire organization, not to mention keep much needed money from people who are truly in need. That is the unfortunate result of our litigious society.

Lawsuits against non-profits can arise from a variety of incidents. Gender discrimination in the distribution of funds or in hiring can cause a lawsuit, as can race discrimination. Sexual harassment can cause a lawsuit. Even age and disability discrimination can bring up lawsuits against a non-profit. One of the causes of lawsuits against non-profits that is particular to the non-profit field is the retaliation lawsuit. Retaliation lawsuits involve claims of retaliation by the non-profit against the bringer of the lawsuit for things such as failure to promote, job reassignment, or discharge of services.

Lately, there have been a lot of donors to non-profits suing the non-profits over the use of funds. This has made it increasingly important for non-profit organizations to carefully document and disclose how they use their funds. There can be no...


A famous example of this happened with one of those children's charities that are often seen advertising on television for sponsors for poor children overseas. The donor gives a certain amount of money each month to supposedly support one particular child, and the non-profit send the donor pictures of the child and letters supposedly written by him or her. When it was discovered that a large majority of these charities did not give funds from one donor to one child, but rather pooled all the money from donors to fund programs to support a large number of children, a large number of lawsuits were brought by the donors, as they felt as if they had been deceived. Other lawsuits have been brought against non-profits due to their heavy use of donor funds on administrative costs, when donors have thought the money they donated was going directly to help people. Because of this, non-profit organizations are taking extra care in making sure they let the public know just how the money that is being donated is being used.
The internet is another potentially large area of liability for non-profit organizations. By putting up website about their organizations, non-profit groups are making themselves into publishers, with all of the same inherent liabilities that publishers face, such as defamation, copyright and trademark infringement, and invasion of privacy. Data theft by hackers and destruction of information by viruses can also open up non-profits that publish on the web to lawsuits. Even if a non-profit organization never does anything wrong, it still can find itself being sued over issues stemming from its use of the internet.

In order to protect itself from potential lawsuits, today's non-profit organization must carry adequate insurance coverage to make sure it won't be wiped out in the case of a lawsuit. Increasingly, non-profit organizations are having to carry higher and higher amounts of insurance to protect themselves from liability. Of course, this costs money, and some of their donated funds must go to cover the high cost of insurance premiums. The non-profit must then make sure that its use of donated funds for insurance premiums is carefully documented and made available to the public, in order to avoid the potential of a lawsuit. Liability issues for non-profits thus becomes a vicious circle.

Traditional for-profit businesses also have found themselves having to be very careful to present an ethical public image, especially in light of the Enron scandal and other recent corporate debacles. Trust in for-profit corporations is at an all time low because of these events. Since public image is tied intimately to profits, and for-profit corporations are obviously in business to make profits, it is important to these corporations to present themselves as ethical in their dealings with the public. If the public happens to think that a for-profit corporation is being dishonest with them, they are likely to take their business elsewhere, thus putting the corporation in the likely position of going out of business.

There are some basic principles that for-profit corporations need to adhere to nowadays in order to ensure continued customer support and satisfaction. These principles are:

To be completely truthful in all claims made about the products which they represent.

Honor all representations made to consumers by sales representatives or by advertising.

To take full responsibility for the quality of the product or service they sell.

To be truthful to each other within the company, as a breach of trust between employees may cause a chain reaction of distrust on up the corporate ladder.

Most business leaders today recognize the importance of ethics in business. Many corporate executives are sending people in their organizations to business ethics seminars, or giving such seminars in-house. There are even courses in the subject now being offered at many major universities and business schools. It is widely recognized that ethical behavior starts at the top of an organization and works its way down. The behavior of the top executives in a company will set the tone of the behavior of everyone else in the company. If the top executives act in an ethical way, then it is likely that the other employees of the business will be ethical in their activities. However, if the top executives are not ethical, the other employees will see this, and will feel as if this behavior is all right to adopt for themselves. In order to avoid an ethical disaster, then, a company needs to have ethical executives.

Many companies are now brining in consultants…

Sources Used in Documents:

Accession no.:70437218).


Roanoke Times & World News p. A9 Roanoke Retrieved October 6, 2003, from ProQuest database. (Accession no.:47787202).

Cite this Document:

"Hba And The Building Trade The Liabilities Of A Professional Association" (2003, October 18) Retrieved June 21, 2024, from

"Hba And The Building Trade The Liabilities Of A Professional Association" 18 October 2003. Web.21 June. 2024. <

"Hba And The Building Trade The Liabilities Of A Professional Association", 18 October 2003, Accessed.21 June. 2024,

Related Documents

The first step is dubbed "Stop and Think." As the steps' name implies, it advises that the decision maker take it slow to avoid bad decisions based on emotions. The second step, "Clarify Goals," is about understanding both short- and long-term impacts of the decision. Next, in step three, the decision maker is to "Determine the Facts" by gathering information. The fourth step, "Develop Options" leads the decision maker

In contrast, the University of Kentucky' College of Health Sciences uses a cooler and more distanced technique. The positive social missions of the school encompass education and research. This benefits students, but also benefits society (and thus potential donors), by providing health professionals and higher-quality care to society as a whole. The University of Kentucky brochure's approach is less personalized in nature than the Center for Common Ground, other than

fundraising activities and particularly grant seeking behaviors is a significant issue for any organization that relies on such funding. According to Jacobson (2006) the manner in which fundraising is integrated into existing systems is also important, as are the promotion of systems that are supportive of existing structures and innovative structure standards. Fundraising systems are so important in the health care field that they potentially make or break significant

Fundraising Activity The rodeo lost $8326 in its first year, and there are a number of different options on the table for improving the profitability next year. One of the options includes the creation of two more major sponsor slots that would be used to offset some of the costs that the organizing committee incurred in the first year. One of the largest costs was $3341 for the contestant hospitality tent,

Technology for Terrorist Fundraising Activities Over the last ten years, the way terrorist organizations have been funding their operations has been increasingly evolving. Part of the reason for this, is because law enforcement has greater tools in going after these groups. What has been happening is a host of different governments around the world have been giving them: increased powers to conduct surveillance and other covert activities against these organizations.

The amount of money the target audience has at its disposal will also determine the type of event held -- a wealthy donor base might justify a fancy auction, with a high price per 'plate,' while a donation drive to encourage teenagers and middle-schoolers to donate a portion of their lunch money to help hurricane victims would stress small donations, but not justify the physical expense of an 'occasion.' At