9 billion to improve its capabilities in the IT services sector.
The truth is that computers have long been commoditized. HP's strengths in innovation are no longer relevant in the personal computer business. Moreover, the degree to which the PC business supports the other HP business lines is debatable. Competitor IBM got out of hardware years ago and the Compaq merger itself was driven by the recognition that this struggling business could only be salvaged through consolidation. Hewlett Packard has done all it can do in the computer hardware business. The hardware business is still growing -- a sign of the brand strength that HP and Compaq enjoy considerable equity. Growth last year was 16.2%. Margins, however, were slender. At just 5.6%, the operating margin for computer hardware was by far the weakest in the company. The best time to divest a business, though, is when it still has some value. The size of the business (nearly $43 billion in revenue) and its growth means that there is substantial value HP can extract. The company will then be able to better focus on its various enterprise services lines. The result of this move will be to focus HP on business where its innovation credentials mean something; on businesses that support one another; an increase in margins; and cash to pay down the debt acquired with the EDS purchase.
The net result of these tactics will be a Hewlett-Packard company that operates in a clearly-definable sphere with a distinct strategy, one of differentiation. Hewlett Packard will then be playing to its traditional strengths. It is difficult to understand managerial reticence to divesting the PC division, given that the company has been going in a different strategic direction since 2005 and the Hewlett family in the ownership group has wanted to move out of hardware for even longer. HP does not have sustainable competitive advantage in that industry and its core competencies are near-useless there. Moreover, it provides a distraction from the businesses that do generate strong profits. To fully adopt a differentiation strategy, HP must focus on the businesses that support that strategy.
Hewlett Packard has gradually shifted its business from its core...
This approach has been somewhat successful, but the purchase of EDS and subsequent economic recession has posed many challenges to HP. The company's balance sheet is terrible, its margins stagnant and the need for cost reduction has become apparent in the face of declining revenues.
The best way for HP to approach this situation is to focus its energies on the businesses that benefit most from its core competencies in technological innovation. The PC hardware business may still be performing well but, as evidenced by its slender margins, is not a business where innovation is relevant. If HP were to divest this business, they could achieve a number of strategic ends simultaneously. They could improve their margin position. They would be able to focus on a differentiation strategy based on technological innovation. HP would be able to pay down some of the EDS legacy debt. Lastly, the company would be able to focus exclusively on the businesses that offer the most growth and profit potential, given the firm's competencies.
Financial information from MSN Moneycentral. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/hilite.asp?Symbol=HPQ
2008 Hewlett-Packard Annual Report. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71087/HewlettPackard_2008_AR.pdf
Taylor, Chris. (2001). Compaq: Fiorina's Folly or HP's Only Way Out? Time Magazine. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,174191,00.html
Gaitonde, Rahul. (2005). HP After Fiorina. CS News. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://www.osnews.com/story/9810/An_analysis_of_HP_s_future_strategy_post_Carly_Fiorina/page3/
Crum, Rex & Kennedy, Simon. (2008). Hewlett-Packard Buys EDS to Create Services Giant. MarketWatch. Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hewlett-packard-to-buy-eds-for-139b-to-create-it-giant
Goldman, David. (2009). HP Cuts Outlook and Jobs -- PC Sales Slump. CNN. Retrieved May 21, 2009 from http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/19/technology/hp/?postversion=2009052016
Fulton III, Scott. (2009). Can the PC Adopt to the Commodity Business Model? BetaNews. Retrieved May 21, 2009 from http://www.betanews.com/article/CES-Countdown-6-Can-the-PC-adapt-to-the-commodity-business-model/1230919257
Botelho, Bridget. (2008). With Economic Downturn, Dell, HP cut U.S. Server Prices. Data Center News. Retrieved May 21, 2009 from http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1341612,00.html
Hewlett-Packard Redefines the HP Way Learning Organizations "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." Henry Ford The case study, Human Resources at Hewlett-Packard, presents a portrait of an evolving organization that moved from its earliest base as a small privately owned company, with a single manufacturing focus, to a multinational conglomerate with multiple lines of business. Like many start-ups, in the early years, the company ethos exemplified that
Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) is a global leader in the research, development, marketing, selling and service of high technology products including laptops, desktop computers, minicomputers, printers and plotters and enterprise storage products as well. The company generated $120B in revenue and an operating income of -$11B according it its latest financial statements on the investor relations section of the HP website. Hewlett-Packard (HP) is known for its strong engineering culture and commitment
Problem Statement #2 The Problem The problem with Hewlett-Packard’s (HP) vision of how to run a successful organization shifted dramatically in the 2000s, beginning with its plan in 2002 to outsource “PC manufacturing facilities worldwide, in keeping with its longstanding strategy to decrease operations costs and improve profitability” (Mourdoukoutas, 2014). By outsourcing its manufacturing, HP entered into a phase of self-destruction, inviting the collapse of its own supply chain through fragmentation inevitably
Business-Level & Corporate-Level Strategie Business- and Corporate-Level Strategies The Company Profile Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), famously founded in a residential garage in 1939 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, has expanded into a wide range of segments. HP and its subsidiaries manufacture personal computers and enterprise computers, thin clients (networked and server-dependent systems), printers, workstations, tablets, retail point-of-sale systems, calculators and other technology accessories, software, Web services, scanning devices, technology support and services for
Part I. Company Overview Dell Technologies Inc is a computer designer and marketer based in Hopkinton, MA. Dell is the third-largest computer hardware company by global market share. It holds a share of 15.9%, trailing HP (21.8%) and Lenovo (20.4%), but ahead of Apple (7%) and Acer (6.8%) (Dunn,2017). Dell Technologies was created with the merger of Dell Inc and EMC Corporation. Dell Inc was founded by Michael Dell in 1984 in
If the company launches an immediate public relations campaign to improve its public perception, it might be able to turn this situation around. This is a definite possibility, given Palm Inc.'s access to the deep pockets of Hewlett Packard. The best strategy will be to try to expand market share at the expense of Apple's iPhone 4. This would provide it with an immediate increase in market share. The