DAV's Chief Executive Officer, Arthur Wilson, last year got $287,000 in compensation plus $72,994 in "other" pay from DAV or related organizations; General Counsel Christopher Clay $198,558, plus $144,331; and J. Marc Burgess, the executive director of the national headquarters, $163,483, plus another $122,532; Vice Chairman Larry Pozin seemed to get best deal, earning $107,240 for an average of just five hours of work a week in 2012 (Crudele, 2013).
There is some debate about whether the compensation is justified. Surely these individuals might earn a higher income in the private market. However, the compensation packages given to the executive staff have outraged some people to the extent that there is now an organized group with a website online that is called Veterans for DAV Reform. This group claims that "currently, the Disabled American Veterans is held captive by an opportunistic gang of charlatans only interested in their own gigantic incomes (Veterans for DAV Reform, N.d.). Other sites rate the organization more favorably and give the organization credit for being transparent but criticize the organization use of its assets (Charity Navigator, 2012). Within this organization, the board of directors is responsible for the compensation packages and the resulting issues that the raises have spun. Although the executive compensation is likely below that of their for-profit peers, they seem excessive to many of the external individual's that are trying to receive benefits from the company.
Figure 1 - City Navigator's DAV Rating (Charity Navigator, 2012)
The not-for-profit industry has developed specific organizations, such as the DAV, to help the veterans who represented their country in the military. DAV is considered the industry leader in providing assistance for veterans and has been doing so for a long time with a rich and interesting history. However, the organization is currently having a problem with the compensation packages that are paid to the executive team to the extent that is has outraged some individuals who have collective organized to form a group and now there is now a website online that is called Veterans for DAV Reform.
This group claims that "currently, the Disabled American Veterans is held captive...
Other sites rate the organization more favorably and give the organization credit for being transparent but criticize the organization use of its assets (Charity Navigator, 2012). Although the executive compensation is likely below that of their for-profit peers, reviewing these policies would help restore confidence in the organization and its effectiveness to help veterans in need.
Not for profit organizations have an interesting challenge with regard to executive compensation. Many of these executives would be paid higher wages if they worked in the private sector. Therefore, some of these individuals are effectively taking pay cuts to work for non-profits. However, this does not seem to be the case with many non-profits who offer their executive teams more than competitive compensation packages. This is clearly evident in less reputable non-profits, but can even be found in the some of the more reputable organizations. This organization was selected because it is in an interesting situation. If the board freezes the wages of the executives then some of them may look for work elsewhere. However, if they continue with the pay raises annually, then they will certainly continue to upset groups of external stakeholders. The organization needs to review their policy and directly engage these groups with justifications for the wages paid to the executive team.
Charity Navigator. (2012). DAV (Disabled American Veterans) Charitable Service Trust. Retrieved from Charity Navigator: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=7589
Crudele, J. (2013, November 12). The Ugly Business of Stealing Money Meant for Vets. Retrieved from New York Post: http://nypost.com/2013/11/12/the-ugly-business-of-stealing-money-meant-for-vets/
DAV. (N.d.). Mission Statement. Retrieved from DAV: http://www.dav.org/learn-more/about-dav/mission-statement/
PR Newswire U.S.. (2013, September 5). Disabled American Veterans Non-Profit Charity Execs Paid as much as the President, while 200,000 Veterans Homeless. Retrieved from PR Newswire U.S.: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail?sid=1141c2a2-2510-4579-b7fe-2c1c88a0590b%40sessionmgr112&vid=2&hid=104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=bwh&AN=201309051018PR.NEWS.USPR.NE74538
Veterans for DAV Reform. (N.d.). What You Should Know. Retrieved from Veterans for DAV Reform: http://davreform.org/?page_id=68
Human Resource Management in International Business Impact of Cultural Differences, Socioeconomic or Political Factors on international HRM Challenges to HRM posed by growth in International Business By looking at the changing trends of the world of commerce in recent times, one can significantly notice the fact that this business community is becoming more and more competitive. This clearly signifies the truth that the elevating competition within the community has given rise to international
Human Resources Planning Budgeting * Components/elements included in an HR Budget * Consider all HR facets such as Selection and placement, training & development, compensation and benefits, employee relations and employee engagement, health, safety and risk management * Cost reduction strategies. Both the cost and the range of functions taken on by a Human Resources Department are directly dependent on the size of the company. Smaller companies tend to make fewer distinctions between
These programs help the employee to use their greatest talents and assets for the improvement of the organization. The fifth area of the total reward strategy involves culture. Culture refers to the attitudes and behaviors that collectively influence how an individual behaves. Cultural change is difficult because it means of changing attitudes and fundamental beliefs of a society or organization. Culture is an element that can influence the total rewards
Human Resource Management is a practice of managing human skills, capacities and talents, to ensure their effective usage in the attainment of organizational goals, objectives and overall competitiveness (Youssef, 2012). Every Human Resource manager performs various functions of recruiting, hiring, selecting and training competent employees. In addition, the manager offers competitive compensation and benefits packages, which attract, motivate and retain qualified employees. However, it is the function of the Personnel
Human Resource Management Using the example of Google, evaluate whether the following HR practices/policies is strategic or not. Does this HR practice help the organization to achieve its goals and objectives? In this paper, we are going to be looking at the impact of different policies and procedures on Google. This will be accomplished by studying the strategies that they are using to attract and retain employees. Once this takes place, is
Chart such as:- Years of Experience Points 1-2 1.0 3-5 1.5 6-9 2.0 10-13 2.5 14-17 3.0 18+ 4.0 Disciplinary Process Progressive discipline is a process for dealing with job-related behavior that does not meet expected and communicated performance standards. The primary purpose for progressive discipline is to assist the employee to understand that a performance problem or opportunity for improvement exists. The process features increasingly formal efforts to provide feedback to the employee so he or she can correct the problem. The goal of