IBM Vs. Microsoft Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1305
Cite

IBM vs. Microsoft Comparison Between IBM and Microsoft

How different corporate emphasis upon hardware vs. software affects accounting practices and financial records

IBM and Microsoft are two technological behemoths. Both companies have been criticized for de facto and de jure monopolistic practices within the software industry at different junctures of their corporation's life. However, from a financial and an accounting standpoint, both companies have distinctively different strengths as well as have exhibited distinct differences in their financial structure, organization, and yes, investor public relations. Microsoft's emphasis on software has led to its stress upon encouraging individual education and familiarity with its web-based and software systems. IBM's need to purvey its hardware has resulted in more conservative advertising and inventory strategies, as well as more outreach to businesses rather than individuals, where depreciation of hardware goods can generate additional profits for the company.

The Microsoft Corporation is currently the more successful and the younger of the two companies. Microsoft currently, in contrast to IBM, is primarily known for its software capacities, rather than IBM's stress upon selling hardware. According to MSN Money, Microsoft "develops, manufactures, licenses and supports a wide range of software products for various computing devices." (MSN, 2004) The hardware/software emphasis of a company is important when understanding its financial base, as software is more dependant upon selling wide amounts of the service to a variety of sources, encouraging long-standing service use as well as simple purchasing of its products. This ensures that, regardless of hardware depreciation, different users may be 'locked into' Microsoft's proprietary software networks. Thus, Microsoft places a great financial emphasis on education, not only out of generosity, but also encourage to company profits. Rather than in terms of selling the maximum amount of general, tangible goods possible, the more people know how to use Microsoft, the better the service will perform financially, as more people will wish to utilize the software and update the software sold.

The Microsoft Company's software products "include scalable operating systems...

...

This aspect of generating revenue has been amongst the company's greatest strengths. By encouraging more individuals to 'tap into' Microsoft's capabilities as a software provider it has integrated more and more individuals into the Microsoft network.
Another key component of Microsoft's financial statements is the stress the company places upon its Internet access and service providing capacity. Although the inclusion of Netscape Navigator has incurred legal charges of monopolistic practices for the company, the 'connectedness' of the Microsoft network has been a substantial source of revenue for the company as well. Microsoft has also incurred profits through the use of this Internet accessing aspect of its company by including updates for its software upon the web, a frequent necessity for surfers and particularly young web savvy consumers who frequently share files and thus run the risk of exposing their systems to viruses, and who need the most technologically forward technology to use the web as they desire.

The Microsoft Company is not entirely software based. It has also solidified its image as a young company by selling its Xbox video game console, along with games and peripherals, creating an additional hardware component to its success. "Its online businesses include the MSN subscription and the MSN network of Internet products and services. The Company's seven product segments are: Client, Server and Tools, Information Worker, Microsoft Business Solutions, MSN, Mobile and Embedded Devices and Home and Entertainment." (MSN, 2004)

In contrast to Microsoft's emphasis on software, International Business Machines Corporation, more commonly known as IBM, is an information technology (IT) company. "Its portfolio of capabilities ranges from services that include business transformation consulting to software,…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

MSN. (2004) Money Central: IBM. http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/sigdev.asp?Symbol=IBM

MSN. (2004) Money Central: Microsoft. http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/research/profile.asp?Symbol=msft

Parish, Bill. (11 November 1999) "Microsoft. http://www.billparish.com/msftfraudfacts.html


Cite this Document:

"IBM Vs Microsoft" (2004, April 24) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ibm-vs-microsoft-167611

"IBM Vs Microsoft" 24 April 2004. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ibm-vs-microsoft-167611>

"IBM Vs Microsoft", 24 April 2004, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ibm-vs-microsoft-167611

Related Documents

IBM DB2 Express - C Installing and Analyzing IBM DB2 Express -- C IBM DB2 Express-C database for Microsoft Windows was downloaded, installed and used as the basis of analysis in this paper. What differentiates UBM DB2 Express-C from the many comparable low-end enterprise-level databases is support for XML integration, dual core processors and 2GB of memory. IBM has been selling their DB2 databases for decades to enterprises globally, and has created

Microsoft Monopoly Assessment of Microsoft's Monopoly Microsoft has for decades engaged in commercial activities both with its direct enterprise customers and its many distribution channel partners that could be considered monopolistic. While Microsoft has long asserted it is one of the most efficient competitors there are in an oligopolistically-based market of enterprise and consumer software, in reality its strategies and tactics show a pattern of deliberate monopolistic behavior (Information Management, 2009). Microsoft

Microsoft Anti-Trust
PAGES 5 WORDS 2266

Microsoft Anti-Trust Issues Issues in anti-trust cases tend to be very complex and technical, but in the case of the government vs. Microsoft, they are quite understandable. The government alleged that Microsoft used predatory pricing tactics to destroy competitors and eliminate competition in the marketplace. They were also accused of erecting technical barriers within their operating systems to make it difficult or impossible for non-Microsoft software to run on Windows. In

Thirdly there is the broader dynamic of how social computing is completely re-ordering the competitive dynamics of the two sectors that comprise this division as well. a. Determine the extent to which Microsoft competes with other companies in its industry by assessing the levels of market commonality and resources similarity for each major competitor. Microsoft's levels of commonality and resources similarity with other competitors are relegated to those companies who have

Further diversification is also recommended. Given the pace of change in the industry, the reliance on PC operating platforms and office software packages must be reduced. The risk of an entirely new technological paradigm emerging is high, so Microsoft must therefore diversify its revenue streams in order to defend against this threat. Overall, Microsoft's strategic thrust is strong and its operating results fantastic. The company must guard against major

Microsoft in India and China Microsoft: Strategy in India and China Microsoft's Strategy in China Although the Chinese Trademark Law is now largely in conformity with the TRIPs Agreement, the benefits of protection may not be realized for some time. At ground level there is a general culture of acceptance of counterfeit goods, partly because it makes previously unobtainable foreign goods affordable and partly because there is a lack of interest in enforcing