Imperial Rome And Han China Comparison Contrast Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
647
Cite
Related Topics:

Imperial Rome and Han China were among the most influential and powerful regimes of their time, and their influences continue to reverberate through history. These two imperial dynastic powers were built upon territorial expansion and colonialist principles. Although they used different methods of governance and had different ideologies, Rome and Han China shared much in common. Both depended on internal peace and stability, brought about less via use of force than via the implementation of robust trade networks that promoted orderliness and prosperity. Both were patriarchal societies with bureaucratic institutions, but the Han system of social and political organization was rooted in the philosophical underpinnings of Confucianism; ancient Rome had no overarching theory, only pragmatism, guiding its practice. Finally, both empires dissolved due to largely the same reasons: the hubris of over-expansionism. Imperialist Rome and Han China both expanded their territorial powers via the use of cultural imperialism and the appeal of economic prosperity, and both dissolved due to the eventual dilution of their centralized power. While both resorted to military methods to acquire new territories initially, both maintained control over remote regions via the establishment of strong local institutions that offered the semblance of legitimacy....

...

More importantly, the construction of public infrastructure via the centralized government allowed the flow of goods and services that helped promote the principle of prosperity. Prosperity engendered support and legitimacy, and also helped to offer the central government regular access to revenues from taxation (“Han Dynasty China And Imperial Rome, 300 BCE–300 CE.” 1). Specifically, both Rome and China used taxation systems to exact tribute from land owners throughout their respective empires. Both imperialist Rome and Han China also used the tactics of colonialism to maintain power throughout their lands (Scheidel 1). For example, both spread the use of a common language and culture. Although neither regime started off with religious ideologies, eventually religion did become infused into politics with Rome embracing Christianity and in China, Buddhism. Yet the fusion of religion and politics corresponded with the demise of these two empires. Both Rome and Han China were therefore able to unify otherwise disparate ethnic peoples under the common rubric of empire.
The downfall of these two massive empires was also due to similar reasons, just as their methods of maintaining empire were also convergent with one another. One of the greatest strengths of both Rome and Han China was the ability to create…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

“Han Dynasty China And Imperial Rome, 300 BCE–300 CE.” Worlds Together, Worlds Apart. W.W. Norton. http://www.wwnorton.com/college/history/worlds-together-worlds-apart3/ch/07/summary.aspx

Scheidel, Walter. Rome and China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.



Cite this Document:

"Imperial Rome And Han China Comparison Contrast" (2018, March 27) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/imperial-rome-han-china-comparison-contrast-essay-2167237

"Imperial Rome And Han China Comparison Contrast" 27 March 2018. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/imperial-rome-han-china-comparison-contrast-essay-2167237>

"Imperial Rome And Han China Comparison Contrast", 27 March 2018, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/imperial-rome-han-china-comparison-contrast-essay-2167237

Related Documents

D.) military conscription could be avoided with the payment of a commutable tax, since the Eastern Han Dynasty preferred the usage of a volunteer army. The volunteer army was known as the Southern Army, and burgeoned its ranks in times of war to assist the activity of the Northern Army, which was the immobile set of soldiers deployed near the dynasty's capital. The Northern army was made up of five

In addition, this door panel, composed of cedar wood, may represent a type of social event which was rather prominent during the Early Christian period, circa 430 C.E. Since one can make out some kind of brick background behind the three figures, the panel might not have been designed to teach or provide instruction on a spiritual event like the crucifixion of Jesus but may be images "from an early