Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Iron Triangle
Defense Spending Military-Industrial Complex Briefly explains iron triangle model policy-making involving Congress, bureaucracy, interest groups. Analyze information relationships Congress, military bureaucracies, defense industries.
Defense spending and the military-industrial complex
The 'iron triangle' model of policy-making is defined as "the closed, mutually supportive relationships that often prevail in the United States between the government agencies, the special interest lobbying organizations, and the legislative committees or subcommittees with jurisdiction over a particular functional area of government policy" (Johnson 2005). For example, in regards to the military, members of Congress benefit when a particular military project is located in their district, so they are more apt to support such military expenditures, regardless of whether the projects are truly valuable or necessary. Compounding the problem, "the middle-level bureaucrats who run the agencies may use their special friends in Congress to block the efforts of a new president or a new congressional majority leadership bent on reforming or reducing the size of their agencies" (Johnson 2005). The Department of Defense on a bureaucratic...
This makes governmental reform of any kind very difficult to instate.
The military-industrial iron triangle can be particularly difficult to question, because of the close relationship of defense contractors and government agencies, both of whom benefit from increased expenditures on defense. "Parties that are charged to manage wars (the military, the presidential administration and congress) and companies that produce weapons and equipment for war (industry)" have similar interests (What is the military industrial complex, 2012, Military Industrial Complex). On a personal level, both defense contractors and government bureaucrats sustain themselves through military engagement and financial profits off of creating defensive equipment and thus are not apt to question one another (What is the military industrial complex, 2012, Military Industrial Complex). This not only encourages 'more wars' and also more spending on the military than may be necessary, diverting funds that could be used more profitably on social programs or deficit reduction to the military. It also can result in substantial government…
References
Bender, Brian. (2010). From the Pentagon to the public sector. The Boston Globe. Retrieved:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/12/26/defense_firms_lure_retired_generals/?page=1
Johnson, Paul. (2005). Iron triangles. A Glossary of Political Economy Terms. Retrieved:
http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/iron_triangles
http://www.militaryindustrialcomplex.com/what-is-the-military-industrial-complex.asp
Ethics In viewing the basic definition of bureaucracy and in noting some of the country's most recent examples of success and failure in the bureaucratic business world, one can see that the issue is clearly two-sided and will likely remain so for many years to come. However, despite the split in opinion, the question of ethics and bureaucracy can be delved into in rational manner that, in the end, finds in
Such resources will include proper funding for facilities, personnel, technological and communicational resources and other such elements required for an administrative capacity congruent with the needs of the public which it is designed to serve. It is thus that the bulk of Meier's book concerns the actual structure of a government based on the principle of bureaucracy. Here, he explores in detail the relationship between a variant of agencies and
Bureaucracy as a Necessary Evil: The Formalized of the Organizational Structure of Government Agencies The creation of an efficient and competitive civil service that is the bureaucracy found in most governments today is often identified as a "necessary evil." Described as a specific form of organization that aims "to provide as much efficiency as possible" and to set up a "hierarchically structured decision-making process that reduces...personal factors to a minimum" (Jackson,
An empowered employee may disobey rules and procedures to help a customer and in turn the organization itself. For further analysis of delegation and empowerment, we need to understand the concept of power itself. In bureaucracies, work is simply done by following preset procedures. Leadership doesn't usually have to impose power, in fact power is granted to employees to choose the best available choice (decision-making) cohering with the rules and
Bureaucracy Working within a large bureaucracy can be at once frightening and comforting, frustrating and easy. Three of the advantages of working within a large bureaucracy include role differentiation, anonymity, and clarity of procedures, rules, and regulations. For example, because of the hierarchical structure of the organization, employees know their roles. Role conflict and job task confusion is relatively rare in organizations with strict hierarchical structures because each individual performs a
However, during the real estate boom at the beginning of the 21st century, banks lent money to people later called 'NINJAs' (No income, no job, no assets) Some of these people were seduced into buying homes they could ill-afford by predatory lenders extending adjustable rate mortgages with low interest rates for a short period of time that quickly became prohibitively high. They ignored their own self-interest in not buying more