Jon Spayde analyses our cultural concept of choice in his Utne article, "The Unbearable Lightness of Choosing." The author tries to convey underlying sociological and psychological meanings of personal choice and personal freedom.
In American society, the doctrine of freedom is often conveyed through the ideal of unlimited choices, especially with respect to material goods.
From the dozens of different breakfast cereals to the equally myriad variety of world religions to choose from, Americans value variety and multiple options.
However, Spayde argues that this notion of freedom, expressed through unlimited personal choice, is essentially a self-centered interpretation.
The choices we Westerners make are based on selfish desires: "what do I want?" It removes family, friends, and the community from the decision-making process.
This interpretation of freedom and choice causes many of our societal ills, according to Spayde, who criticizes the American vision of "choicefullness." Instead of becoming fixated on variety of personal choice, Spayde advocates basing choices on connectedness and friendship: making decisions based on the common good.
Spayde's position seems to be in radical opposition to American consumer consciousness.
Whereas a bombardment of advertisements presents a particular worldview in which consumer choice is paramount to friendship, Spayde suggests that unlimited choice actually restricts our freedom.
The economic model of choice is delusional because the isolating nature of consumerism makes decision-making more difficult.
We feel isolated when we are reduced to homo economicus," Spayde states on page 3.
The "blitz" of information that bombards our senses from the mass media clouds a true, honest, and positive vision of the universe.
Using Einstein's example, Spayde argues that we need to decide that the universe is a friendly place in order to make decisions that will nurture us.
Moreover, Spayde defends "bad" decisions, affirming that there is really no such thing as a wrong choice: every choice leads us somewhere...
omewhere meaningful.
The most significant events in our lives are those not made by personal choice but by circumstance.
According to Spayde, Americans are uncomfortable with this sense of powerlessness: we are taught to control every aspect of our life.
Now, with revolutions in science, we can choose our own gender, our own facial features, possibly even the genetic codes of our children.
We can choose which religion to practice, where to live, and what profession to pursue.
These choices were not always available to us, but this level of personal choice has become part of the American way of life, what we assume our soldiers fight for in the so-called "war on terror."
Spayde cleverly connects the current American foreign policy and xenophobia with this distorted sense of freedom.
Our president insists," says Spayde, "that terrorists and other enemies wish us ill because of their blind hatred of freedom," (1).
This is the dogma we are fed as Americans, perpetrated by the mass media.
However, Spayde examines exactly what this "freedom" means.
For many Americans, freedom entails purchasing power.
Therefore, the poor can be considered genuinely disenfranchised; their personal liberty is limited by their lack of financial means.
Anyone who must place limits on their consumer choices is considered to have a lack of freedom.
However, this concept of freedom is unhealthy, unproductive, and contributes to dissatisfaction and isolation.
The truly meaningful parts of life: love, friendship, family, creativity, and joy, are not determined by this illusory freedom.
Consumer goods can occupy our attention for a limited time but rarely offer soul-satisfaction.
There is nothing wrong with getting excited about a new car or video game consol, but to place those items as higher priorities than love, friendship, and creativity causes a plethora of problems.
Families and friendships frequently break up over choices based solely on money.
In fact, Americans…
Cracking and Protecting My Genetic Code Cracking Your Genetic Code Genetics has advanced to the point that it is inevitable that genotyping services will become commonplace and increasingly inexpensive, unless legislatures take action to limit the public's access to this information. Since genotyping services are essentially businesses catering to the public and providers of medical services, an issue about quality and the relevance of findings becomes important. Near the beginning of the
cheap genomic sequencing has widespread and unforeseen cultural, political, and societal implications that have only just begun to reverberate through the human population at large. Genomic sequencing not only reveals some of the causes and connections behind certain diseases or disorders, but also puts the lie to certain forms of bigotry which assumed that dramatic phenotypic differences represented a similarly dramatic genetic or biological difference (put another way, genome
Genetic screening is one of the most controversial topics in the scientific arena today. The advent of the Human Genome Project, which maps the complete human genetic code, has brought this issue to the forefront. This paper will discuss the basic science that underlies genetic screening, applications of genetic screening, and investigate some of the common misconceptions and ethical questions about its use. Genetic screening itself is simply "the systematic search
(Biohazards: The Next Generation? There is a wide variety of such products and that includes salmon which grow twice as fast as the regular salmon, but nobody is thinking of the consequences when these fish will escape from the farms where they are being cultivated. Some types of plants like poplar, eucalyptus and pine are being modified so that their rate of growth increases and are able to stop reacting
Genetic Engineering The process of altering genes, or genetic engineering, has become a more heated subject as science and technology continue to evolve. In fact, with DNA technology, genetic modifications within plants and other organisms has become a major development, especially in the world of agriculture and medicine. However, there is still the possibility of the inability to contain the spreading and somewhat "tainting" of non-genetically modified organisms, which seem to
Genetic Engineering The alteration of the genetic structure of any organism is done by means of Genetic engineering that provides characters beneficial or pleasing to the individual performing the alternation. In other words it is a treatment of the DNA or RNA pool (Sarah. 2002). For instance, the most greatly well-known example of genetic engineering is the sheep Dolly that was cloned in the year 1996. Here, in order to create