Kodak's Digital Strategy It is very notable to mention how Kodak experienced a downfall with the emergence of digital imaging. Kodak's stock fell from about 80 USD to 3 USD within a period of less than ten years. The number of employees also declined. In 1988, the company employed about 140,000 employees but currently it has employees of not more than 20,000. This was as an unavoidable challenge and Kodak used all its efforts it had to overcome the challenge of digital imaging just like any other film company. Eastman Kodak had a vision of selling many cameras at lower prices to draw massive profits to the papers, inks and chemical used in printmaking. This strategy saw its downfall with the digital revolution and the foreign competitors negatively affected Kodak's venerable command in the photography business (Grant 22).

Discussion

Kodak slowly responded to this emerging digital revolution. From the time of the introduction of digital imaging, Kodak has witnessed its revenue declining from around $15 billion to about $9.4 Billion. During the previous five years, Kodak has made layoffs of 40,000 jobs and is still about to do away with another 3,500 to 4,500 in the year 2009. From the beginning of 2003, Kodak has been on the verge of implementing a number of restructuring programs to overcome this challenge. An estimated 80% of the revenue that Kodak receives comes from the sale of new products and provision new services established in the previous five years. The employees who work at Kodak, 60% of them were recently employed in the previous four years (Grant 53).

Nevertheless, during some time, the situation of Kodak started to change as it has always underrated the market changes. There has occurred an important transformation from traditional film to digital imaging products and photographing tools flooding the market. This saw the emergence of an era fully saturated with digital technologies. The film...

The competitors also increased in number and offered cheap products and services especially from the Asian region. The cost of producing digital cameras was reduced. Kodak tried to restore their once position in the photography industry by introducing digital cameras that are easy to use; they were received with much success. To some extent, Kodak has restructured the connection between film and cameras. This was regarding an analyst Buckman who lists rates the stock of Kodak as a buy. Kodak does not gain much from taking photos, but they still have the mission of selling products and services. Kodak is still in a limited position. Shares of Kodak, which circulate around $60 at the start of the decade, have risen up and down-with more emphasis on the downside (Grant 60).
Disaggregation on capital employed

Operating Profit Margin of Kodak: The financial ratio of Kodak indicates that the business is becoming more efficient. While the company has been experiencing a decrease in results, this could be a signal of a looming financial crisis. Kodak has been operating on a downward trend until the turn of the 21st century when it picked up. Nevertheless, this was temporary.

Net return on sales: A close diagnosis of Kodak's earnings reveals that the company has good earnings. However, this is not an indication that the company's profit margins are improving. Instead, it indicates that the company must establish better measures to control costs. Recently, Kodak had a low NPM, which has increased over time reaching its highest in 2008. However, since then, it has taken a downward direction again. This means that Kodak the GPM of the company has been declining at an alarming rate (Grant 75).

Photography consumers have continued to reserve digital images in popular…