Lawrence V. Texas On June Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
705
Cite

The decision in Lawrence Case has certainly opened a door for other important causes like gay marriage, for example. From this moment on, marriage became the final battleground in the quest for true equality, and judges have favorably pointed to Lawrence in rulings saying marriage discrimination violates their state constitutions. After Lawrence Case, there has been a series of state, federal and military courts cite it in nonmarriage decisions helpful to gay Americans: the Idaho Supreme Court on Sept. 21 said gay parents must be treated equally in custody disputes with heterosexual ex-spouses; the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on March 7 ruled that a Lebanese gay man is eligible to apply for U.S. asylum because he fears being tortured and killed if forced to return home; in U.S. v. Marcum, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces on Aug. 23 signaled it will decide on a case-by-case basis whether certain sexual conduct banned by the military is actually protected under Lawrence.

Courts will no longer be able to use sodomy laws against gay people in cases dealing with adoption by same-sex parents or workplace discrimination,...

...

The most important achievement in Lawrence Case is that the first step has been made in homosexuals' battle for equality.
Bibliography

Lawrence & Garner v. State of Texas. 13 April 2006. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lawrence.htm

Price, Deb. Texas Case Fuels Momentum for Gay Marriage. 11 April, 2005. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lweditorials109.htm

Supreme Court of the United States. Opinion of the Court. 26 June 2003.. 8 March 2007 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-102.pdf

Lawrence & Garner v. State of Texas. 13 April 2006. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lawrence.htm

Supreme Court of the United States. Opinion of the Court. 26 June 2003..8 March 2007 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-102.pdf

Price, Deb. Texas Case Fuels Momentum for Gay Marriage. 11 April, 2005. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lweditorials109.htm

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Lawrence & Garner v. State of Texas. 13 April 2006. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lawrence.htm

Price, Deb. Texas Case Fuels Momentum for Gay Marriage. 11 April, 2005. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lweditorials109.htm

Supreme Court of the United States. Opinion of the Court. 26 June 2003.. 8 March 2007 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-102.pdf

Lawrence & Garner v. State of Texas. 13 April 2006. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lawrence.htm
Supreme Court of the United States. Opinion of the Court. 26 June 2003..8 March 2007 http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-102.pdf
Price, Deb. Texas Case Fuels Momentum for Gay Marriage. 11 April, 2005. Sodomy Laws. 8 March 2007 http://www.sodomylaws.org/lawrence/lweditorials109.htm


Cite this Document:

"Lawrence V Texas On June" (2007, March 09) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lawrence-v-texas-on-june-39526

"Lawrence V Texas On June" 09 March 2007. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lawrence-v-texas-on-june-39526>

"Lawrence V Texas On June", 09 March 2007, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lawrence-v-texas-on-june-39526

Related Documents

Constitutional Law The case of the 'Lawrence vs. Texas' of June 26, 2003, was in a nutshell about privacy rights and 'equal protection' under the law, and whether 'sodomy' can come under the protection of the U.S. Constitution. Who were the Petitioner(s) and the Respondent(s)? The case deals with two gay men, or in other words, homosexual men, that is, men who prefer partners of the same sex, who happened to be

In other words Emotional Intelligence means that the individual is capable of: (1) Accurately perceiving emotions in oneself and others; (2) Uses emotions to facilitate thinking; (3) Understands emotional meanings; and (4) Manages emotions well. This model is referred to as the 'ability' model of emotional intelligence. (Mayer & Salovey, 1997) DANIEL GOLEMAN-PERSONAL & SOCIAL COMPETENCE Daniel Goleman proposed the model of emotional intelligence based on the Personal and Social competencies

However, these poor, landless and mercenary men, despite the fact they worked for hire still frequently exhibited selfless behavior for their fellow soldiers in the face of adversity, such as at Valley Forge. One of the most unique aspects of this book is its methodology. It attempts to integrate evidence about battles, armaments, military technology and the history of the early army into the greater social and political history of

During this penultimate period of violence under Rojas, the violence that wracked Colombia assumed a number of different characteristics that included an economic quality as well as a political one with numerous assassinations taking place. These were literally contract killings there were sponsored by opposition forms. There were also horrendous genocidal acts that were carried out by gangs combined with authentic revolutionary fighting in some regions of the country. The fourth

As the company's Web site points out, "We recognize our continued success depends on our ability to attract, develop and retain a highly competent workforce and on the creative, effective and productive use of human resources. Therefore, Continental is committed to a work environment that provides equal employment opportunity" (Diversity and inclusion, 2010, para. 30). The company's stated diversity policy is as follows: 1. Continental affords equal opportunity for employment

When does insanity excuse criminal liability? A defendant has an excuse for liability, says Paul Robinson, in his book Criminal Law Defenses, when he or she is acting involuntarily and their own disability causes him or her to mistakenly or unknowingly violate a criminal prohibition. This person does not know whether his or her behavior is wrong or criminal (Robinson 222). This is in contrast to what is called a character-based