Leadership Case Study -- Chattanooga Essay

More specifically, Charlie must announce that his administration will neither reward nor tolerate the "CYA" approach to collaboration in which the principal focus of each business unit head is to make sure that any blame or responsibility is automatically shifted to other business units practically irrespective of any interest in solving the problems, wherever they originated. Charlie must establish an organizational culture of responsibility, in connection with which he must announce that demonstrating the ability and willingness to recognize and correct problems will be rewarded while defensiveness and deliberate attempts to focus blame elsewhere will no longer be tolerated. In the immediate period, Charlie should abandon the consensus approach to decision-making and take on the decision-making role of his predecessor. He should schedule private meetings with each business unit head with the instructions that the only topic of discussion will be ways to contribute to the solution of the problem within each respective business unit. During those meetings, no discussion will be permitted that pertains to any other business unit whatsoever. Charlie should announce that what will be rewarded will be business-unit-specific solutions and not arguments that fault lies elsewhere.

What could Charlie do to...

...

Charlie should also abandon any practice of responding passively (such as by feigning a deaf ear to complaints and hoping that the individuals will get the hint and stop complaining. He must use his authority to explicitly prohibit that sort of destructive communications while encouraging productive communications and honest acknowledgement of problems and responsibilities on the part of all parties. Finally, Charlie should announce that business unit leaders who wish to become part of the management decision-making team must do so by demonstrating their ability and willingness to examine their own possible responsibility for problems. Those who can do that may earn their right to participate in management decisions once again; those who persist in merely calling attention to the limits of their units' responsibilities and frame all problems as being attributable to the mistakes of others will not be invited to participate in future management decisions and may not have a long future within the new organizational culture of shared responsibility and collaboration at Chattanooga.

Cite this Document:

"Leadership Case Study -- Chattanooga" (2010, September 01) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-case-study-chattanooga-12262

"Leadership Case Study -- Chattanooga" 01 September 2010. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-case-study-chattanooga-12262>

"Leadership Case Study -- Chattanooga", 01 September 2010, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-case-study-chattanooga-12262

Related Documents

This fact will allow the company to now grow its operations in the target locations while some competitive companies would have to concentrate on generating more income to cover the financial liabilities, rather than to make more capital expenditure to grow the brand. The company has chosen to reduce the number of its current assets by decreasing the number of inventories which does not have a negative impact on the

5% of pre-tax profits donated to community social and environmental organizations through the Ben & Jerry's Foundation. In addition, Unilever will contribute another $5 million to the foundation and create a $5 million fund to help minority-owned businesses" (2000, 22). Clearly, the company enjoys a wide range of product lines that can be positioned according to the cultural preferences in a given region as well as less easily defined attributes such

Marketing -- Chapman's Ice Cream Company Description: Chapman's Ice Cream The Chapman Ice Cream story is a classic small business makes good tale. In a village near Georgian Bay of Markdale, Ontario, a Canadian couple bought a roughshod small creamy and began working on a dream to manufacture a quality ice cream delivered with small town personality. In 1973, David and Penny Chapman had two trucks, four employees, and a big idea.

Sweet Dream Imagine that Paradise Foods did not launch any new products If the current marketing tactics were maintained, the La Treat line would eventually lose market share to competitors. Products such as these are called ice cream "novelties" for a reason -- even if consumers love the product, they will likely search for something new and different at some point. The relatively high cost and the sophistication of the product make

Sales Promotion Unfortunately, there is a total ban in Norway on the marketing of all alcoholic beverages containing more than 2.5 per cent alcohol by volume, a category into which this product presumably fits. This includes posters, neon, advertisements on restaurant fixtures, newspapers, television and radio (Osterberg & Karlsson, 1998, p.334). There are some exceptions by which the product may be promoted. First it may be promoted via foreign publications. Whether this

Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream
PAGES 7 WORDS 2820

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) (2002) was passed into law specifically for this reason. Unlike Unilever attempting to use governance to supplant and eventually replace the triad missions of Ben & Jerry's, many corporations including Enron, MCI, Tyco and many others did not have an ethical foundation to begin with at all. The use of SOX to legislate compliance to ethical standards is in effect trying to enforce ethical ecosystems