Skip to main content
Thesis Master's 2,489 words

Three leadership perspectives and organizational excellence in military command

~13 min read 6 sections
✍️ How to write this paper — writing tools ▾
Essay 2,489 words

¶ … Systems Perspective, Organizational Behavior Perspective, and Organizational Development Perspective. I have discussed how the three theories apply to my leadership style and how they relate to my definition of leadership which is the betterment of the organization and its people. The three perspectives were key to the success of my Squadron and the care and welfare of the organization, followers and Families. The next chapter will define what I have learned and why it is important to me as I cover my final thoughts.

Final Thoughts

As I reflect back why I started my pursuit of getting a degree I would have to "Thank" a lot of people. My wife would be the number one reason for me pursuing my completion of the whole degree process as it took a lot of prodding and poking, she's the best. I have many senior leaders and peers that I would like to "Thank" who pushed me when I wanted to stop or did not see the need for a degree. My Soldiers were the driving force behind me as a leader wanting to complete my degree and I need to "Thank" them. I wanted to be the example for them to emulate as they should strive to better themselves, careers and their Families. Being a leader as I have stated in my paper has always and will always be the driving force behind me wanting to better things around me and being a successful leader.

I have learned so much in our MAOL program that will make me a better Civilian leader as I start my life's next chapter. There are so many theories that will benefit me and the people I will end up working for or with.

What is most important for me as a leader is to never fail my organization and its people and great leaders will go to any length to accomplish whatever missions are set before them. Leadership is also about bison and goals and a good leader will strive to ensure their followers are never without guidance and purpose.

According to Lewis, Andriopoulos & Smith (2014):

"In hypercompetitive environments, organizational survival depends on strategic agility -- flexible, mindful responses to constantly changing environments. Strategic agility is inherently contradictory. Being strategic depends on a stable, unwavering commitment to a future vision, and involves formal planning processes and established routines. Yet agile organizations are adaptable and nimble, applying emergent decision making and novel approaches as needed. As Doz and Kosonen argue, "Strategic agility is a conundrum…a real-life, hard to resolve contradiction for corporate leaders and their executive teams. (p. 58)

It is this thought expressed which such clarity that comprises my application of the definitive framework that composes that which the leader should set their sights upon or strive towards realized through having a clear strategic vision and a well formulated plan for problem-solving and decision-making that serves to effectively ensure the organizations welfare. I will not fail nor let down my fellow leaders and followers as our MAOL program is the very basis of great leadership facts that will ensure my leadership success.

Essence or Major Cornerstones

Servant Leadership and Authentic Leadership

There are many cornerstones that make up my leadership philosophy but I am going to discuss two that are very important to me as they more closely relate to my leadership definition. The first one and most important is "Servant Leadership" which is based on the assurance of the betterment of an organization and its people. Servant Leadership is about the leader putting the needs of others before his or her own needs. This theory directly ties back to my leadership definition and how it should be applied to ensure the overall organizations betterment. Greenleaf (2008) states "A mark of a leader, an attribute that puts him in a position to show the way for other, is that he is better than most at pointing the direction" (p.17). I strive every day to be that servant leader who not only ensure the people are being taken care of but pointing the way by my actions and deeds. It is imperative that leaders understand that they are not only expected to lead they are expected to give direction and vision at all levels.

Organizational Ethics

The second cornerstone is "Organizational Ethics" which supports my leadership definition by caring for the people. Ethics and values are the foundation of leadership and without ethics and values you cannot have great leaders. Utilitarianism is very closely related to the theory of Servant Leadership by doing the greatest good for the greatest number or followers before the leader's needs. Johnson (2012) states "Utilitarianism considers both short- and long-term consequences when making ethical determinations" (p. 20).

This belief is imperative for leaders at all levels to understand as they have to know that actions and words have a long lasting impression. Our followers are not ignorant of the actions of us as leaders, they will see right through our intents, words, and actions. Leaders have to ensure that what they do and say is not only beneficial to the followers but ethical and just and in line for the most good for the most people. Leaders are the examples and paths that our followers are expected to be like and follow.

Conclusion

As I conclude my paper on "Why Great Leadership is Critical" it is important to reflect back on all the chapters. I have talked about thoughts on leadership and why it is critically important to all leaders so that none may fail. I have thoroughly discussed my definition of leadership which is mission accomplishment and the betterment of an organization and its people. I have discussed the difference between managers and leaders and the similarities between the two as managers run organizations and leader direct where the organization will go.

I have discussed in depth what leaders do by having vison of where they want the organization to migrate and grow into. I have discussed what leadership theories which are to define the leader most and their roles. I have discussed self as leader which has defined leaders going to any length to complete missions and care of their organizations and people. I have discussed why core values are imperative to leaders as they set the values of the future followers. I have discussed ethical framework which also covers the role of the leader and why it is important to know and use ethics as a leader. I have discussed organizational change framework which is about change and the need for change as an organization should never operate on just one course of action.

Unlock this full paper and 135,000+ more
View Full Document

Organizational Change Emphasized

Organizational change is not the exception but rather is the norm as change in the globalized world market drives the need for change in the organization. Whether that change be the embracing of a new level of diversity or whether the needed change is a complete change in processes, functions, or methods of production or even change management in which the management in the present will be restructured, reassigned or in extreme cases replaced. The point is that the organization that resists change will not evolve and strengthen itself and fall into decay however; the organization and the leadership within the organization that are forward looking and utilize strategic thinking, team building and ongoing learning and training will be well-prepared to rise to the changes and the inherent challenges that accompany these changes across time.

Stagnant leadership does not desire to change the status quot and neither do stagnant employees and what is mean by this is leadership and followers who are in a rut, who have fallen into a daily grind and while these individuals are bored, not motivated, not excited, not challenged and not moving forward with new knowledge and skills, they are complacent and content with the way things are because it makes a requirement of little effort on their part. However, it is this that spells doom for the organization in that if the organization is not growing, expanding, developing or pushing its own limits in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and success, then the organization is depressing, regressing and likely to suffer a soon death due to the limitations within which the organization's leadership, teams followers exist.

Leadership that shirks the duty of challenging those whom are being led, leadership that does not push the limits and have a vision for more success, effectiveness, efficiency, and overall betterment of the organization is not leadership. Leadership does not lead those being led into a regressive existence within the organization but instead leads those whom they are leading progressively setting higher goals and setting out the vision and means to achieving these higher goals and more optimal objectives for the organization.

I have learned in the research in this study that leadership is never stagnant, never complacent, never content and always seeking ways to better the organization and the skills knowledge of its employees. Authentic leadership is constantly on the look out for potential future leaders in the organization to maintain a continuum of effective leadership in the organization's future.

While some leadership may view this in a manner that they would not desire to create new competition in the organizational leadership's repertoire, the simple fact is that Authentic leaders are fully invested in the organization in which they lead and ensuring effective future leadership for the organization simultaneously ensures that investors and stockholders will profit from the success of the organization in the future.

Oftentimes, today's business leadership, and this is particularly evidenced in the corporate world, are focused on the here-and-now seeking to make a quick hit with fast profits and never giving consideration top the organization's future. However, such as in the case of the leadership of Enron, had leadership followed ethical and solid leadership methods and theoretically sound framework in leadership, then perhaps Enron, referred to as 'the smartest guys in the room' would not have became so rich so quick, so unemployed so quickly, and for many of them had they followed Authentic forms of leadership, they could have avoided sitting in prison for their crimes.

Following ethical standards and principles ensures that the world at large, the business and corporate world, its investors and regulators all have respect for the organization. When the organization is respected on these levels and high standards held strict within the organization, then the employees of the organization as well as its leadership feel proud to be part of such an extraordinary organization and the ethical and principle of the organization self-perpetuate to benefit of the organization as a whole.

Whereas an organization that is always being cited by regulatory and legislative matter for having violated such, that has a reputation or double-dealing and double-dipping will be the organization that leadership and alike are in reality ashamed to be a part of and with the fail to respect the organization due to its own sleazy practices, the attitude of 'anything goes' rules the day.

I have discussed self-assessment being based on my leadership style and how they relate back to our accessible assessment tests. I have discussed Leadership in context by using an experience of my life and applying three theories back to our MAOL program. I have given my final thoughts on what is most important to me which is the betterment of my people. I have covered two major cornerstones that tie in with my leadership definition. I concluded the paper with my thoughts on how the MAOL program has changed my opinions and leadership abilities. As I finish this paper it is with a little bit of sad and happy thoughts. On the sad side I wish I had taken this course earlier in my career as I would have been able to apply earlier to both my leaders and my followers. On the happy side I am very happy that I will be able to use the information in the future with the hopes of it bettering me in my next career. With all of this being said, I would like to relate lastly that this study has greatly expanded my knowledge of leadership and what leadership really means and as well I have learned methods, techniques, theory, and ideologies related to effective leadership. I have gained new skills that will assist my future leadership and due to the research in this study know with great clarity that I am better prepared for my role in organizational leadership. I will be able to draw back on these studies to ensure that I am constantly growing in my knowledge and skills as a leader and therefore leading those whom are following in doing the same all to the benefit of the organization. The organization can be viewed as the goose's golden egg that can be either nurtured to produce more gold for the organization whether that gold be in the form of new products, processes, or greater profits or even higher levels of effectiveness however, alternatively, if the egg is misused, neglected or ignored, the egg will spoil and the organization soon follows.

302 Words Hidden
Evolution of Thinking302 words
My thoughts on leadership as I conclude my MAOL journey is a very narrow minded view. By that I mean that leaders lead and great…
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2015). Three leadership perspectives and organizational excellence in military command. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-is-critical-2150295

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.