Looking With a Different Lens

¶ … Lens In accordance to the conflict theory, social institutions and the deviant behaviors do not go together and are never in tandem. In addition, the conflict theories also emphasize and point out to the power differentials such as class conflict and the largely disparity traditionally prevailing philosophies. Essentially, the conflict theory is founded on the understanding that the societal and fiscal forces within the society are the simple reasons for crime. In accordance to conflict theorists, police play a fundamental role in this notion of social control.

I am not in agreement with this perspective. The main reason why I do not support this standpoint is largely for the reason that police are meant to act and serve as agents of social control. Deviance and crime within the society take place as a result of insufficient constraints. With regard to social control theory, the perspective of human beings in their own nature encompasses the notion of free will. This consequently offers offenders the ability of choice, and accountability for their behavior and conduct (Kempf-Leonard and Morris, 2012).

To start with, conflict theorists perceive the society to be a combination of populations that are stratified, but competing at the same time, with every populace, employing every accessible resource to enhance and sustain its position in the social and economic realm. From this standpoint, dominant police violence is perceived as a means for advantaged societal select few to overpower and control any possibly threatening populaces.

My position in this case is that if coercion were the only practice through which stratified societies are seized together, this of course would bring the anticipation of more extensive and aggressive police violence than in the contemporary United States. Instead, killings and assassinations committed by the police are comparatively rare happenings.

This element, nonetheless, does not signify a resilient challenge to the application of police killings as a sign of social control consequences, as rate of recurrence is not essentially a precise depiction of the efficacy of police violence in safeguarding privileged welfares. In addition, the conviction that sorts of supremacy and dominance are appropriate, or conceivably too influential to be confronted, can in itself, be a basis of authority for the dominant group. This is because it additionally depresses and sinks confrontation by subjugated populaces.

For instance, the simple intimidation of death, in itself, can be domineering, even when the intimidation itself is rarely achieved (Snyder, 2013). The police play a pivotal role in this notion of social control, as they hold a longstanding control on coercive force and legally sanctioned violence against members of the society itself. The mutual association that subsists between the police force and society's dominant values fundamentally controls the application of this monopoly.

Regardless of whether it takes place inertly or with resolve, society essentially forms police conduct through lawmaking commands, official accountability structure, and the impact of societal norms. Taking into consideration the inferences and consequences of conflict theory, it implies that the work undertaken by police is essentially discordant with regard to economic and social aspects, which are also essentially racial in several American circumstances. More so, it is inevitably racial in many American contexts, and is obviously conflicting to the welfares of economically or socially underprivileged populaces.

Taking this into account, it gives the suggestion that any violence engaged by law.