Macroeconomics Cases Study New Sports Stadium The claims by backers of this project may not be objective or accurate. That is because most of the "quality" jobs the project creates will be transitory in nature, such as the construction jobs during its construction. Thereafter, most of the types of jobs necessary to run the new stadium will be unskilled,...
Macroeconomics Cases Study New Sports Stadium The claims by backers of this project may not be objective or accurate. That is because most of the "quality" jobs the project creates will be transitory in nature, such as the construction jobs during its construction. Thereafter, most of the types of jobs necessary to run the new stadium will be unskilled, semi-skilled, and minimum-wage jobs such as ticket booth workers, private security, maintenance and grounds cleanup, parking attendants, and refreshment stand workers.
Those are not the type of "quality" jobs that will help the community. Furthermore, there are significant quality-of-life costs associated with the new stadium. For example, high-profile professional sports events almost always cause traffic congestion in their vicinity. Likewise, they absorb community resources such as law enforcement and sanitation workers and add to overtime costs associated with those extra demands. Education for the Future This approach to using public funds would be a valuable means of contributing positively to society.
In the modern age, unskilled jobs are rapidly disappearing and it is becoming even more important for young people to develop intellectual skills that will enable them to qualify for skilled jobs. Increasing the compensation for teachers would be one of the most sensible ways of improving the quality of public education. Establishing objective standards designed to improve educational programs would also be very beneficial.
However, the experience with the failed No Child Left Behind (NCLB) policies of the Bush administration demonstrated that standardized testing cannot be relied upon excessively and that "teaching to test" must be avoided at all costs. Transportation Express In principle improving transportation systems is a good idea for the community. However, it is doubtful that expending more money on highways is worth the expense for several reasons. First, all efforts should be made toward reducing our reliance on fossil fuels instead of encouraging continued reliance on automobiles in the future.
Therefore, the available funds should be used to develop alternate transportation methods such as modernized rail systems and even traditional public transportation systems that damage the environment and consume gasoline less than private automobiles on a per-passenger basis. Second, we should be striving to reduce the trend of working in urban areas and living in suburban areas that developed throughout the 20th century in the United States. That is one of the reasons we became so dependent on automobiles as a nation in the first place.
Therefore, the money should be spent on developing better, cleaner, and more efficient public transportation systems and on maintaining existing infrastructure such as bridges and tunnels that are in tremendous states of disrepair across the nation. Conversely, developing new highways is likely counterproductive in the long run. Eliminating Taxes Eliminating taxes across the board.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.