CEOs, however, would most likely argue that they are invaluable to their companies, and are adequately compensated for the work they do. While the authors of this article conclude that they are not attempting to persuade readers to one position or the other, they do suggest that they are attempting to allow readers to understand the double-sided argument of CEO pay. In accomplishing this goal, they have done well. Both employees who are frustrated at the lifestyle that their CEOs are able to live while they struggle to get by and CEOs who are making hundreds of dollars an hour would be able to understand the rational for each side in this argument. By presenting the argument in this non-biased formula, the authors invite discussion on the topic, a discussion that most likely would not have happened if this type of presentation has been achieved. In allowing for an open discussion on this topic, the authors have encouraged both CEOs and employees, both those in favor of large CEO payments and those against them to pioneer a new type of business discussion and relationship, which is open and desires to meet the needs of officers, employees, and customers.
Article Five
Introduction
Human Resources is a field drastically concerned with the development of a diverse workplace, a company with the benefit of employees and officers from a variety of backgrounds. It is only in this situation -- one of diverse business members -- can a business manage to meet the needs of its customers, which are similarly diverse. The world of business, however, is not necessarily as diverse as many would like, especially in terms of the number of women represented. A summary of the Harvard Business Review article on this topic will allow readers to see some of reasons why women are underrepresented in the workplace and how to correct those problems.
Summary
In their article, Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership, Alice H. Eagly and Linda L. Carli attempt to answer the question of why women do not have as many positions as CEOs as men do. In their answer, the authors suggest that the metaphor for achieving the top executive position in a company are all wrong for women, and that "if one has misdiagnosed a problem, then one is unlikely to prescribe an effective cure" (2008). The problem lies in the glass ceiling metaphor, according to Eagly and Carli, which suggests that the way to attaining a CEO position is relatively straightforward, though a barrier, the glass ceiling, exists to prevent accomplishments above a certain height. For omen, Eagly and Carli explain, the path is much less straightforward. Instead of shooting for the ceiling as traditionally described, women must wander through a labyrinth like system of paths and dead ends before making their way to the CEO position. Essential, therefore, Eagly and...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now