Merger Financial Analysis Of The Term Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1648
Cite

The leadership personnel of the companies were far more affected by this merger, and there is no evidence that this merger was viewed as anything but a positive move for both companies by these individuals (Coffee 2006; Taft & Musich 2006; Knorr 2006). The cash premium that was paid to Mercury Interactive shareholders and the ongoing increase in price for Hewlett Packard stock following the merger makes it likely that shareholder response to the merger was equally positive (Google Finance 2010; Hewlett Packard 2006a). Conclusion

Many mergers, especially in the past decade of increased scrutiny of accounting methods and financial reports, are quite complex and time consuming. The merger between Hewlett Packard and Mercury Interactive, however, was accomplished with a great deal of simplicity and efficiency. Though the primary benefits to both companies were found in the boosted assets, market share, and operational scope of the merged entity, the efficiency of the merger process was also a contributor to its success.

References

Boardman, B. (2006). "Merging for muscle." Network Computing, 17(6), pp. 16.

Coffee, P. (2006). "HP-Mercury: Modules to monoliths." eWeek 23(3), pp. 18.

Google Finance. (2010). "HPQ." Accessed 27 October 2010. http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NYSE:HPQ

Harkiolakis, N. & Mourad,...

...

(2009). "Preserved Valuation Measurements in Mergers and Acquisitions of Similar Size Corporations." In Recent Advances in Management, Marketing, Finance. Penang, Malaysia: WSEAS Press. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:kSabfbC1VpcJ:scholar.google.com/+hp+mercury+interactive+merger&hl=en&as_sdt=1
Hewlett Packard. (2006). "Press Release." Accessed 27 October 2010. http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2006/060725a.html.

Hewlett Packard. (2006a). "Frequently asked questions about HP's definite agreement to acquire Mercury Interactive Corp." Accessed 27 October 2010. http://h30261.www3.hp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71087&p=irol-faqMercury.

Hewlett Packard. (2007). Annual Report. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71087/pdf/HP_2006AR_ADA.pdf.

Hewlett Packard. (2008). Annual report. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71087/AR2007/pdfs/hp_annual_report_2007.pdf.

Knorr, E. (2006). "HP Adds Mercury to the Mix." InfoWorld 28(31), pp. 8.

Mercury Interactive. (2006). Annual Report. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://sec.edgar-online.com/mercury-interactive-corp/10-k-annual-report/2005/03/14/Section2.aspx#D10K_HTM_TOC.

Taft, D. & Musich, P. (2006). "HP's Mercury buy boosts SOA." eWeek 23(30), pp. 16.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Boardman, B. (2006). "Merging for muscle." Network Computing, 17(6), pp. 16.

Coffee, P. (2006). "HP-Mercury: Modules to monoliths." eWeek 23(3), pp. 18.

Google Finance. (2010). "HPQ." Accessed 27 October 2010. http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NYSE:HPQ

Harkiolakis, N. & Mourad, L. (2009). "Preserved Valuation Measurements in Mergers and Acquisitions of Similar Size Corporations." In Recent Advances in Management, Marketing, Finance. Penang, Malaysia: WSEAS Press. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:kSabfbC1VpcJ:scholar.google.com/+hp+mercury+interactive+merger&hl=en&as_sdt=1
Hewlett Packard. (2006). "Press Release." Accessed 27 October 2010. http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2006/060725a.html.
Hewlett Packard. (2006a). "Frequently asked questions about HP's definite agreement to acquire Mercury Interactive Corp." Accessed 27 October 2010. http://h30261.www3.hp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71087&p=irol-faqMercury.
Hewlett Packard. (2007). Annual Report. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71087/pdf/HP_2006AR_ADA.pdf.
Hewlett Packard. (2008). Annual report. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71087/AR2007/pdfs/hp_annual_report_2007.pdf.
Mercury Interactive. (2006). Annual Report. Accessed 27 October 2010. http://sec.edgar-online.com/mercury-interactive-corp/10-k-annual-report/2005/03/14/Section2.aspx#D10K_HTM_TOC.


Cite this Document:

"Merger Financial Analysis Of The" (2010, October 27) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/merger-financial-analysis-of-the-7364

"Merger Financial Analysis Of The" 27 October 2010. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/merger-financial-analysis-of-the-7364>

"Merger Financial Analysis Of The", 27 October 2010, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/merger-financial-analysis-of-the-7364

Related Documents

The company's promotional literature emphasizes the synergistic effects of this corporate structure: "IAG combines the two leading airlines in the UK and Spain, enabling them to enhance their presence in the aviation market while retaining their individual brands and current operations. The airlines' customers benefit from a larger combined network for both passengers and cargo and a greater ability to invest in new products and services through improved financial

Financial Analysis of Lehman Brother Lehman Brothers The history has been full of financial collapses and financial scandals and one of the biggest financial collapses that a company has ever seen was that of Lehman brother. The collapse of a firm as huge as Lehman Brother and a firm which has such great experience of over a hundred years lead the world into a shock. It created doubts in the minds of

Overall, at&T is the more profitable of the two companies. That Verizon has the stronger gross margins and at&T the stronger net margins indicates that at&T does a better job of controlling its cost structure than does Verizon. The Industry The telecommunications industry is highly competitive in both the landline and wireless segments. By 2006, wireless spending had match wireline spending. While this presents significant opportunities for telecommunications, much of that spending

Financial Comparison Financial analysis is a tool that allows third parties to analyze corporate financial statements. One of the main reasons that the Securities and Exchange Commission requires that statements are compiled and presented in a consistent manner is to ensure that third parties will be able to use the statements to compare different companies. These comparisons can, among other things, help with investment decisions. This paper will compare PepsiCo and

Clearly, Republic holds very low inventory levels. Waste Management holds high inventory levels, with the industry average falling in between. This relatively inefficiency has certainly not hurt Waste Management, though, judging by the other aspects of its financial performance. Analysis of External Environment While nationwide there are 15,000 firms in the waste services industry, in any given market Waste Management will have only a small handful of competitors. Most of these

This seems to have been in response to the perception of an upcoming slowdown and indicates that the firm is both cognoscent of its liquidity position and is taking steps to ensure the robustness of that liquidity position. Moreover, in terms of cash flow coverage, State Street is in a solid position. Cash flow coverage measure the ability of the firm to pay its interest expense. In each of the