Milgram Experiment Information Located At Research Proposal

Length: 4 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Teaching Type: Research Proposal Paper: #81468346 Related Topics: Expert Witness, Academia, Holocaust, Human Reproduction
Excerpt from Research Proposal :

However, it has some very valid aspects that make it a good research tool. First, it is up to the minute. The Milgram Experiment page was last edited on March 17, only a little more than a week ago, and often the most immediate current events are already on the site when the researcher goes to look for them. Thus, it is much more up-to-date than any comparable print media, which go out of date nearly as quickly as they are printed. It can be updated from anywhere in the world on a moment's notice, and there is a large group of readers and editors who are quite involved in critiquing and editing articles to ensure their authenticity and accuracy.

The site would probably be more academically correct if the editors were experts in their field, professors, or other professionals, and if certain respected academic resources were used as references. It would also help if the authors were experts, drawn from a pool of experts in many different areas. In an encyclopedia, the editors and authors are the top people in their fields, which is another complaint about Wikipedia. Anyone can add anything, so there is not as much control as there is in print media. However, because of the requirement of citations and further reading, the site acts as a wonderful place to begin researching just about any topic. The researcher can get an overview of the topic, find more information, and come to a broader understanding of just about anything by visiting Wikipedia at the beginning of their research project.

The article could use the addition of some insight from the professor himself, but other thank that, it is an accurate article that mirrors the many other articles, journals, and books that discuss the experiments. The most detailed of these articles, from "Psychology Today," magazine, looks at the experiments in today's world, and gives more information on what they actually meant. The author writes, "They demonstrated with jarring clarity that ordinary individuals could be induced to act destructively even in the absence of physical coercion,...


While the article does discuss some of the implications of the experiments and what they said about humanity, more of that detail would only add to the article's overall impact and information.

Yes, I believe Wikipedia does have a place in student research. It offers comprehensive information on a wide variety of topics, and when the information is shallow or questionable, the site offers an explanation or warning to the researcher. While anyone can edit the site, and there have been some outrageous hackers involved in some incidents, it is a valid tool because it requires citations and references, and it requires a balanced and professional writing tone. There are editors that monitor the site, and they do take down offensive or highly inflammatory articles. It does have standards, even though it is open to anyone anywhere. It is an excellent place to begin researching a topic, because it offers more information on just about every topic on the site. If the student is looking for a brief, concise, and helpful tool to start researching, Wikipedia is certainly the place to begin. In the future, it seems that as Wikipedia becomes more respected, it may be recognized as a legitimate research tool. With some oversight by professionals, it could turn into one of the world's greatest research tools, because the information is immediate, and it is constantly being updated. It is a useful tool, and it is too bad more people cannot use it now because it is not respected in the academic world.


Blass, Thomas. "The Man Who Shocked the World." Psychology Today. 2007. 26 March 2009.


Editors. "The Milgram Experiment." 2009. 26 March 2009.


Levinson, Martin H. "Crazy Talk, Stupid Talk-Redux." ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 63.1 (2006): 67+.

Miller, Arthur G., ed. The Social Psychology of Good and Evil. New York: Guilford Press, 2004.

Stafford, Tom. "Milgram's Notorious Conformity Experiment Replicated." Mind Hacks. 2008. 26 March 2009.


Sources Used in Documents:


Blass, Thomas. "The Man Who Shocked the World." Psychology Today. 2007. 26 March 2009.


Editors. "The Milgram Experiment." 2009. 26 March 2009.


Cite this Document:

"Milgram Experiment Information Located At" (2009, March 27) Retrieved September 19, 2021, from

"Milgram Experiment Information Located At" 27 March 2009. Web.19 September. 2021. <>

"Milgram Experiment Information Located At", 27 March 2009, Accessed.19 September. 2021,

Purpose of

The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.

Related Documents
Milgram's Experimental Research
Words: 1217 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Drama - World Paper #: 73907999

Milgram's Seminar Research After the Nazi atrocities, during the Second World War, towards the Jews, many people wondered how people could have been so sadist and committed such behaviors. The Nazi's death camps were where Jews were tortured and killed by skilled administrative personnel, and these administrators were decent German citizens. Many people still wonder the reasons that could have motivated them to participate in such obnoxious behaviors. Milgram (1974) carried

Human Aggression and the Stanford Prison Experiments
Words: 2535 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Criminal Justice Paper #: 28316387

Human Aggression and the Stanford Prison Experiments Studies of human aggression tend toward myriad and often competing conclusions about that which drives us to behave ethically or unethically, about the forces that incline us toward altruism as opposed to those which incline us toward aggression, about the impulses to behave according to internal values and the pressures to bend to contextual authority. Perhaps few studies on the subject have penetrated the

History and Links of Social Psychology
Words: 1320 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 89246979

History Of Social Psychology According to Kruglanski and Stroebe (2012) social psychology is defined as the scientific study of how a person's feelings, behaviors, and thoughts are influenced by the implied, imagined, or real presence of other people. Social psychology will analyze various social topics including social perception, behavior leadership, conformity, prejudice, nonverbal behavior, and aggression. It attempts to understand a person's behavior in a social context. Therefore, social psychology will

History of Social Psychology: Past and Future
Words: 2484 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 12479081

History Of Social Psychology: Past and Future Directions The fields of psychology and social psychology owe their existence to the earlier philosophical thinkers including Aristotle, Plato, Descartes, Locke, Hume and Kant. However, the recognized founder of the field (by most historians) is the German scientist Wilhelm Wundt (Farr, 2003). In 1862 Wundt proposed that there psychology should consist of two branches: a social branch and a physiological branch of psychology (Farr,