Milgram's Experimental Research Term Paper

Length: 4 pages Sources: 3 Subject: Drama - World Type: Term Paper Paper: #73907999 Related Topics: Authority, Holocaust, Quantitative Research, Stealing
Excerpt from Term Paper :

Milgram's Seminar Research

After the Nazi atrocities, during the Second World War, towards the Jews, many people wondered how people could have been so sadist and committed such behaviors. The Nazi's death camps were where Jews were tortured and killed by skilled administrative personnel, and these administrators were decent German citizens. Many people still wonder the reasons that could have motivated them to participate in such obnoxious behaviors. Milgram (1974) carried out of the most fascinated experiments to investigate the motive that makes people obey the authority.

Objective of this study is to discuses Milgram's research that focuses on obedience to authority.

Milgram's Experimental Methodology

Stanly Milgram's, a psychologist, carried out one of the most controversial experiments to investigate the obedience to authority. The participants were recruited from all walks of life and were divided into two groups. A group was to play the role of teachers, while the other group was to play the role of learners while Milgram played the role of an authority. The participants were also given the token fees of $4.00 in order to encourage them participating in one hour experiment.

Teachers' roles were to administer increasing level of electric shocks on learners for any incorrect answer. Milgram labeled the shock levels from 15 to 450 volts and volts were labeled:

slight shock, moderate shock, strong shock, very strong shock, intense shock, and Extreme intensity shock.

In reality, the electric shocks delivered were just 45-volts. The strategy was to make teachers believe that they were inflicting high level of electric shocks on learners. The teachers were asked to deliver...

...

As the experiment continued, the learners would plead to be released. Once the teachers increased the volts to 300 volts, the learners would bang on the wall and would be demanding to be released. As electric volts were increasing, some students were completely silent, however, the teachers were asked to treat the silence as an incorrect answer. As the intensity of the shock increased, the learners yelled in pain, however, the experimenter ordered the teachers to continue administering the electric shocks. Although agitating and nervous, however astonishingly, more than two thirds of the teachers obeyed the order and administered the higher shocks on learners despite that the level of volts was as high as 450 volts.

Milgram concluded from the results of the experiments that when an authority ordered people to do something, they would carry out the order even if the acts violate their conscious. The results of the Milgram experiments assist in understanding the motive of Nazi's crimes. Milgrams suggested that people would commit the holocausts in order to obey the authorities even when the obedience is wrong. To validate the results, Milgram carried out the same experiments with totally different set of people and recorded the same results.

Recent Research

Recent research also agrees that people will still be ready to obey the authority. Burger, (2009) experiment also reveals that the obedient to authority remains unchanged after more than 50 years of Milgram's experiment. Although, the compliance rates are slightly lower than the rates recorded by Milgram, however, Burger still finds no difference on the rate of obedience to authority between men and women. Burger implemented the same experiment by allowing the teachers to produce a level of electric shocks, between 15 volts and 450 volts, on learners. Similar to Milgram strategy, Burger also pays a token fee of $50 to encourage people to participate, although, 150 volts are the critical point…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

Burger, J.M.(2009). Replicating Milgram: Would People Still Obey Today? American Psychologist, 64 (1):1-11.

Michael, S. (2012). Milgram Revisited. The Journal of Global Responsibility. 3 (1): 66-82.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper.


Cite this Document:

"Milgram's Experimental Research" (2014, November 04) Retrieved January 26, 2022, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/milgram-experimental-research-2153787

"Milgram's Experimental Research" 04 November 2014. Web.26 January. 2022. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/milgram-experimental-research-2153787>

"Milgram's Experimental Research", 04 November 2014, Accessed.26 January. 2022,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/milgram-experimental-research-2153787

Related Documents
Milgram's Theory of Obedience to Authority
Words: 1963 Length: 7 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 48266064

Stanley Milgram on Obedience Legitimacy and Proximity: Social Influences that Determines and Generates Obedience in Stanley Milgram's Obedience Study (Behavioral Study of Obedience, 1963) For many years, psychology, as one of the main branches of social science, has tried to discern and understand human behavior and its relation to the society through empirical observation and experimentation. Social scientists, under the philosophy, methods, and principles of psychology, tried to understand human mind, particularly

Obedience in Milgram's Experiments
Words: 1734 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 2260458

Milgram Obedience, Morality and the Scientific Process in Milgram During the period between 1963 and 1974, social psychologist, professor and theorist Stanley Milgram published a landmark series of findings regarding the nature of morality, authority and obedience. Compelled by the recently revealed atrocities of the Holocaust, Milgram was driven to better understand the kinds of institutional forces that could make ostensibly ordinary men and women commit acts of such heinous proportions as

Experimental Critique You Have Just Answered an
Words: 1678 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Teaching Paper #: 19385851

Experimental Critique You have just answered an advertisement to participate in an experiment from researchers at Yale University. You enter a professional looking building and are met by a professional looking man in a white lab coat. You have been paid $4.50 (which would have easily filled up your gas tank in 1961) to participate in a memory and learning experiment. The experiment requires that you play the role of "teacher"

Research Ethics the Little Albert Experiment the
Words: 802 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 4600796

Research Ethics The little Albert experiment The little Albert experiment is a famous psychology experiment that was conducted by a behaviorist John. B. Watson. The participant in the experiment was a nine-month-old boy and he was exposed to various stimuli that included a white rat, monkey, masks and burning news papers and the reactions of the boy were observed. Initially no fear was expressed by the boy at any objects shown to

Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Research: The
Words: 1744 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Business - Advertising Paper #: 98281490

Field study research, including marketing focus groups and one-on-one questionnaires, beta-testing of a product by real consumers, and other qualitative endeavors, shows the real, lived experience of individuals, and how they will relate to the product and make a place for it in their lives. Marketing is about process -- the process of selling a product, not an end product, given that marketing must be responsive the environment and to

Burgers 2009 Replication of the Milgram Experiment
Words: 1458 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 17086104

Stanley Milgram’s groundbreaking psychological experiments on obedience remain famous not just because of what they revealed about human behavior, but also because of how they drew attention to the need for more robust ethical codes in psychological research. Burger (2009) replicates Milgram’s most famous obedience studies in “Replicating Milgram,” tweaking the methodology to ensure ethical treatment of research participants. Therefore, the Burger (2009) experiment uses slightly different experimental approaches. Experimental