" The stanza discusses how Bill's friends tried to "persuade" both themselves and him that they were not afraid and therefore showed this by comforting him with kisses. However, the following stanza shows how this statement is not entirely true. The poet goes on to state, "If we had more, we would have given more. As it was we stood next to your bed, stopping, though, to set our smiles at the door." At first the poet tries to convince himself that they did all they could, more than necessary, even going as far as standing guard over his deathbed. Yet in the last line the poet admits that this was not enough and was in fact nothing but prefabricated "smiles at the door."
The feelings of guilt continue in the final stanza, which states: "Not because we were less sure at last. Only because, not knowing anything yet, we didn't know what look would hurt you least." Finally, the poet admits that they too, like the rest of society, were ignorant as to the pain and suffering caused by Bill's disease. Not knowing what Bill was going through, the poet was unable to understand whether his token gestures of comfort would hurt Bill more than the disease itself.
Conclusion
The theme of guilt and shame dominate this poem. This is evident once one takes the time to analyze the poem line by line. At...
However, on closer examination, it becomes clear that, due to their ignorance of the disease and the resulting fear of it, these friends of Bill did little less then what they had to (handshakes, visits and quiet smiles). As a result, after Bill has died, they feel guilt. This poem, when seen from this perspective, along with the surrounding social and political climate of the time, is to be read as a poem to Bill. It is an attempt to give something to Bill to make up for what they failed to give him when he needed it most: understanding.
The reason this poem is so effective and powerful is that it is written for Bill. The letter format brings the reader in and places the reader next to Bill's bed. It forces the reader to evaluate their feelings towards a man dying of an incurable disease. It forces us to critique the strength of our fears vs. The importance of our friendships. Further, by personalizing the disease with the name "Bill," the reader sees the disease as not a mysterious, medical ailment that only effects people in other nations but as a disease that can effect our closest friends and our society's ability to be humane. It is this technique that makes Mr. Miller's poem powerfully relevant even today.
O Brother, Where Art Thou? Homer in Hollywood: The Coen Brothers' O Brother, Where Art Thou? Could a Hollywood filmmaker adapt Homer's Odyssey for the screen in the same way that James Joyce did for the Modernist novel? The idea of a high-art film adaptation of the Odyssey is actually at the center of the plot of Jean-Luc Godard's 1963 film Contempt, and the Alberto Moravia novel on which Godard's film is
" James a.S. McPeek further blames Jonson for this corruption: "No one can read this dainty song to Celia without feeling that Jonson is indecorous in putting it in the mouth of such a thoroughgoing scoundrel as Volpone." Shelburne asserts that the usual view of Jonson's use of the Catullan poem is distorted by an insufficient understanding of Catullus' carmina, which comes from critics' willingness to adhere to a conventional -- yet incorrect
As Geisel (2004) notes: Income-tax deductions are worth the most to high-bracket taxpayers, who need little incentive to save, whereas the lowest-paid third of workers, whose tax burden consists primarily of the Social Security payroll tax (and who have no income-tax liability), receive no subsidy at all. Federal tax subsidies for retirement saving exceed $120 billion a year, but two thirds of that money benefits the most affluent 20% of