multicultural workplaces face when competing in the current market. As multiculturalism begins to have more of a presence in management and leadership positions, organizations will need to address issues unique to them and modify their leadership strategies. Implementing cultural programs would be one such strategy, and it would require organizations to evolve, look inward, and make transformational change in order to create and improve multicultural employee retention. Such a strategy would create 'grooming' or succession processes for proteges; preparing employees from within the corporate structure for career advancement into leadership positions. Studies show that the benefits would be mutually beneficial in that the employee would feel appreciated which could translate into long-term gains for the organization. This will be a theoretical paper addressing the many factors contributing to the lack of ommunication clarity in multicultural workplaces and whether managers in global organizations have a greater tolerance for ambiguity.
1. Do managers in global organizations have a greater tolerance for ambiguity?
2. Can mentoring or coaching programs in global organizations improve communication clarity in leadership?
Based on the study carried out by Trochim (2006), one finds two primary approaches towards investigative logic: 1) deductive and 2) inductive. Deductive reasoning, also called the "top-down" tactic, works via more general goals up to the more specific goals. The inductive reasoning, also called the "bottom-up" tactic, works another way i.e. begins by getting specific goals in the researcher's mind and then developing them into generalized and common notions and practices. To be able to achieve the objective of this research the investigator used both inductive and deductive approach (Trochim, 2006).
One will find two primary formats of data collection methods: 1) quantitative that is essentially number breakdown and representations of all of the data and 2) qualitative including different intangible dimensions and may incorporate photographs, videos and audio recordings. The second is much more elaborate then your former. Within this study the researcher used both numerically proven improvement stats provided (i.e. quantitative data) along with the personal insights from the subjects (i.e. qualitative data) (Bouma, 2002).
Through the years there has been two precise sampling methods utilized by numerous scientists. These methods would be the probability along with non-probability sampling methods. Cohen Manion and Morrison (2000) in their study explain that the primary distinction between both of these methods would be that the former is much more casual and doesn't possess a specific target or segment from the population in mind whereas the non-probability sampling procedure is extremely formal and incredibly purposeful in the selection of who the investigator studies and why. Within this particular study, for quantitative analysis, the subjects were selected from (title of companies) of (country of origin). The investigator used non-probability convenience sampling to hands pick subjects from all of these companies (Easterby-Smith et al., 2002).
For undertaking semi-structured interviews, the investigator used the non-probability sampling procedure because it permitted us to include the various methods which are built round the personalized and subjective insights. Hence the interview sample being analyzed here comprised of four people. These individuals were selected using the convenience sampling procedure which permitted the investigator to begin while using initial sample of individuals and then cutting it down till he got nearest to the sample that was most suitable and helped him formulate the conclusions in relation to the objective of the study (Trochim, 2006).
Data Collection Techniques
Typically, the surveys may take up one of these simple two forms: a questionnaire or perhaps an interview. The first kind usually involves an itemized approach that the respondent utilizes in responding to the "questions" provided to him within the survey while interviews are to be carried out not by the respondent but by the interviewer, as opposed to a questionnaire. In certain situations, it can be hard to differentiate between your two groups of surveys (Saunders et al., 2003).
Each time a questionnaire is used, people will probably intuitively assume that a set of questions will be delivered via postal mail as most people have, at some stage in their lives, been requested to deal with a questionnaire received via mail. A large number of advantages exists for surveys which are sent through mail. First of all, they aren't as pricey as some of the other methods. Apart from that, exactly the same questionnaire could be copied and be delivered to numerous people in the exact form. In addition, it…