Skip to main content
Essay Master's 2,477 words

National economic effects of Canada's immigration policy history

~13 min read 9 sections Economics
Abstract

This essay discusses the National economic effects of Government's immigration policies in Canada. It discusses the motive for their denial was that most of the old strategies were overwhelmed by racism, consequently of terror of losing "the Canadian White Uniqueness." The fresh alterations of more open-minded immigration policies came about as an outcome of the weight from non-racist administrations, several religious groups, and the universal community.

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
Essay 2,477 words

National Economic Effects of Government's Immigration Policies In Canada

A geographically big nation that has a comparatively little population, Canada has traditionally been able to observe immigration as an important tool of population and economic development. Over its history, nevertheless, immigration significances and approaches have changed meaningfully, from an open border tactic in Canada's initial history, to strategy that could be branded as openly discriminatory, to an economically absorbed style. This essay gives an outline to immigration policy in Canada and looks into immigration in the context of economic effects of Government's immigration policies in Canada with detailed focus on its history, key legislation and agencies in this area, and current debates/issues.

History of Canadian Immigration Policy

After the Confederation in 1867, immigration policy at that time was a top priority of the new federal government. This policy which was able to bring in a large influx of immigrants was observed as a key economic strategy to boost national demand for domestic goods and arouse the country's small manufacturing subdivision. Furthermore, Canada observed to immigrants to settle the mainly vacant lands in the west as a way of safeguarding national power in these parts.

Throughout the First World War, the federal government enforced better restrictions on migration to Canada. In the sponsorships of national security, the government got rid of all immigration from enemy countries, counting Germany, Austria, and Hungary (Kelly, N. & Trebilcock, M.). Furthermore, inhabitants from those countries previously living in Canada were documented as enemy aliens under the War Measures Act, 1914 (Knowles).

Furthermore, among the years of 1908 and 1909 about 8,000 new refugees arrived in British Columbia, typically of Japanese and East Indian basis (Green). This new trend of "non-white" immigrants shaped an abundant deal of conflict in British Columbia's "white" inhabitants. Thus of this displeasure, Vancouver residents began rebelling against the arrival of Japanese into British Columbia, because of their fear of "a Japanese attack" (Daniel, D.). Therefore, the federal government of Canada put out a bill in the Immigration Act of 1910, acknowledged as the "unceasing journey rule." (Dirks) This rule banned an entry to Canada to any immigrants, who did not come straight from their nation; short of any other stops at any other harbors along the way (Abu-Laban, Y.). Therefore, this new rule made it unbearable for the Japanese and east Indians to come into Canada, for the reason that there was no uninterrupted steamship service from either nation into Canada (Abu-Laban, Y)

In the 1940s, approaches in the direction of immigration began to change. When the Second World War ended, Canada went through unparalleled economic growth, which lessened distresses over Canadian workers losing their jobs to cheap distant labour. Furthermore, unrestricted ideas for instance the welfare state and multiculturalism started to take hold in Canadian society, nurturing better allowance of dissimilar ethnic groups and raising distresses over ethnic and spiritual discrimination.

In April 2010, the province of British Columbia and federal government announced a new inter-government contract on immigration (officially mentioned to as the Canada-British Columbia Immigration Agreement) (Abu-Laban, Y.). Under the new agenda, British Columbia safeguarded superior effect over the assortment and settlement of immigrants to the area. Furthermore, the federal government approved to hand over $114 million to the jurisdiction to back regional settlement and incorporation services (Knowles).

Economic justification for immigration

There is no decided opinion on the net influence of immigration in present times. In history, Canada's remarkably high immigration taxes can be drew to the nation's sole economy. One issue is that Canada has one of the world's major provisions of natural resources for example metals, and lumber and oil. It also has a thin populace spread over a massive scenery. Canada has therefore confronted acute labour deficiencies and has replied by vigorously penetrating for immigrants (Green). In the late 19th century this encompassed transporting Chinese refugees to construct the Canadian Pacific Railway and aggressively marketing in Europe to find farmers with the Last Best West campaign. Today similar recruitment efforts are needed to staff the oil sands projects in Alberta (Knowles).

Immigration as a Concurrent Power

Under Canada's Establishment, immigration is documented as a "concurrent power," meaning that dominion is officially shared among the federal government and the outlying areas. Under this outline, the federal government has limited dominion over "aliens and naturalization," which empowers it to regulate the amount of immigrants acknowledged to Canada, and the principles contrary to which they are designated. In this background, the federal government has presented key lawmaking, for instance the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, which summaries national methods to these immigration matters (Abu-Laban, Y.). The federal government, nevertheless, has cooperated with the outlying areas to create immigration objectives and strategies, though the level of collaboration has mottled at times. In this respect, some regions have more aggressively contributed in immigration policy than others; the prime example, starting in the 1960s, is Quebec (Green). With a different French language and social legacy, Quebec has recognized its own section of immigration and has assigned several contracts with the Government of Canada concerning immigration strategy, standards, and targets (Kelly, N. & Trebilcock, M.).

The provinces likewise appreciate important controls over immigration policy that are related with the part they play, by means of constitutional authority, in the delivery of education and social services. Intrinsically, the jurisdictions play a significant part in immigration expenditure services, for instance housing, language education and job training. The federal government likewise contributes in this field through services and programs subsidized by the Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the accountable state department (Simich).

Quebec Participation in Immigration Policy

With the Quiet Rebellion and rising national self-determination in the 1960s, the Government of Quebec went after a much more active part in immigration policy (Knowles). In this setting, immigration to the area came to be professed as a utensil to reinforce the francophone nature of Quebec civilization, furthermore to being a means of upholding populace heights in the expression of deteriorating birth proportions. In 1968, the area recognized its own immigration department (Kelly, N. & Trebilcock, M.).

Unlock this full paper and 135,000+ more
View Full Document

Quebec's device over immigration substances connecting exclusively to Quebec was protected in the 1990s, with the recruit of the Canada-Quebec As said by Immigration and Provisional Admission of Foreigners. Under this contract, and through succeeding renegotiations with the federal administration, Quebec gotten regulation over setting its own yearly immigration objectives, enjoys sole accountability for picking immigrants that settle in the area (with the exclusion of immigrants and family reunion classes), and has self-governing offices abroad for employing, broadcast, selecting, and showing immigrants. The Government of Quebec is similarly answerable for providing integration and settlement services to new immigrants to the province, with fractional federal subsidy backing (Green).

Legislative and Regulatory Structure

Canadian immigration law has a lot to do with both regulations and statutes. Statutes are legislation passed by Parliament. In the part of immigration, important statutes comprise of the Refugee and Immigration Protection Act, the Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act, and the Citizenship Act (Simich). Rules, by contrast, are procedures and rules officially accepted and edited by government actions under the authority decided to them by decrees. Important sets of guidelines in the area of immigration contain Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations and Citizenship Rules.

The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act each has the decision-making power over immigration strategy. In this setting, the Act distinguishes the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration as becoming accountable for the Act's management. The Act also distinguishes that the minister and cabinet could make any rule connecting to the Act and immigration performances. The Act and its rules also start the basic necessities persons will need to have in order to settle to Canada, and the necessities for continuing in the nation. Other important mechanisms of the Act comprise of the following: the drawing of events and bodies exact to the refugee group of immigrants, the founding of a petitions procedure for disavowal of immigration entitlements, and events for the Act's implementation (Abu-Laban, Y.).

Education

The economic effects also influence education. The Canadian system applies great stress on finding accomplished immigrants, nevertheless this system does not always perform that well (Kelly, N. & Trebilcock, M.). Immigrants that go to Canada are more accomplished than the ones that go to the United States. George J. Borjas associated migrants to Canada and the United States discovering those to Canada being much more educated and getting higher salaries once established. He gives the credit to Canada's points founded immigration system, and contends for the United States to more carefully imitate the Canadian technique (Green).

Within the Canadian economy, immigrants are the ones that are the most educated. In Canada, 38% of male workers with a post-graduate degree are settlers to the nation (Abu-Laban, Y.). In Canada, 23% of Canadians are born from another nation, but 49% of them even have doctorate degree so they are exceedingly educated (Daniel, D.) An untiring issue for skilled immigrants is the recognition of foreign qualifications. Even though Canada recruits individuals to come founded on their degrees, numerous strangers come and discover that employers and professional organizations not knowing their foreign education (Kelly, N. & Trebilcock, M.). As the proportion of expert beginners as a portion of total migrants has risen, so has this issue.

From 2003 to 2008 78% of settlers who came in Canada held a university degree, a sharp rise over the 28% who came before 2001 (Citizenship Act (R.S., 1985, c. C-29)" Department of Justice Canada). The setting of values for, or credit of, nearly all expert qualifications does not fall inside the federal government's control and are consequently not governed by either Citizenship and Immigration Canada policies or federal laws (Dirks) but Citizenship and Immigration Canada recognized the Foreign Credentials Referral Office to offer something like almanac help ability for immigrants (Simich).

The Administration of Ontario passed the Fair Access to Controlled Professions Act, 2006 to benefit refugees to succeed for 34 provincially controlled occupations (Dirks). The Act likewise recognized the state of Fairness Representative (Ontario). In 2007, the Administration of Alberta contracted a contract with national government that will hasten the procedure of foreign credential credit for new migrants by certifying bodies in that domain (Abu-Laban, Y.) Other outlying areas have made parallel promises.

Income

Income was also a result of the effect. This is because the higher rates of joblessness and lower wages put together to provide strangers less revenue than the Canadian regular. Examination of census statistics as of 2000 displays that immigrant proceeds were at 67% of the federal average after 10 years of exist in Canada (Daniel). In preceding periods, immigrant revenue levels did increase to the nationwide regular after 10 years, nonetheless in new years the condition has worsened. A study done in 2003 printed by Statistics Canada made the point that "in 1980 new refugees had low-revenue taxes 1.4 times that of Canadian born, by 2000 they were 2.5 times advanced, at 34.6%." (Dirks) The study made the point that the weakening was wide-ranging and affected most kinds of settlers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Canadian Immigration Acts have really changed meaningfully. In the past, there have been a lot in from numerous nations desired to aid in building new nation called Canada. However, they were declined to enter for the reason that of diverse skin color. Furthermore, the motive for their denial was that most of the old strategies were overwhelmed by racism, consequently of terror of losing "the Canadian White Uniqueness." The fresh alterations of more open-minded immigration policies came about as an outcome of the weight from non-racist administrations, several religious groups, and the universal community. As a result, today's Canadian immigration policy classifies individuals, who desire to become permanent residents of Canada, by three groups; irrespective of their nationality, race or skin color. It is obvious that National economic effects of Government's immigration policies in Canada with a lot a different way but income is where it hurts the immigrants the most because some of the new acts sort of restrict from having the same benefits that regular citizens in Canada.

414 Words Hidden
Discrimination in Immigration Policy414 words
As talked about from above, Canada's early immigration strategy was extremely discriminatory of definite religions and races. All through the 1960s, nevertheless, any kind of…
References
9 sources cited in this paper
  • Abu-Laban, Y. Keeping ‘em Out: Gender, Race, and Class Biases in Canadian Immigration Policy” in Painting the Maple: Essays on Race, Gender, and the Construction of Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press,, 2008. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0003961. ↗
  • —. "Welcome/stay out: The contradiction of canadian integration and immigration policies at the millennium." Canadian Ethnic Studies 45.3 (2008): 190-211.
  • Citizenship Act (R.S., 1985, c. C-29)” Department of Justice Canada. 7 May 2009. ↗
  • Daniel, D. "The debate on family reunification and canada's immigration act of 1976." The American Review of Canadian Studies, 35.4 (2005): 683-703,783.
  • Dirks, G. “Immigration Policy.” The Canadian Encyclopedia. 4 May 2012. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/immigration-policy-canada-history-administration-and-debates. 8 March 2013. ↗
  • Green, A. G., & Green, D. "The goals of canada's immigration policy: A historical perspective." Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13.1 (2004): 102-139.
  • Kelly, N. & Trebilcock, M. The Making of the Mosaic: A History of Canadian Immigration Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
  • Knowles, V. Strangers at Our Gates: Canadian Immigration and Immigration Policy, 1540-2006. Toronto: Dundurn Press,, 2008.
  • Simich, L,. "Providing Social Support for Immigrants and Refugees in Canada: Challenges and Directions.”." Journal of Immigrant Health 7.4 (2009): 23-56.
Key Concepts in This Paper
Canadian immigration policy economic effects labour shortages discrimination multiculturalism federal-provincial jurisdiction Immigration Act 1910
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). National economic effects of Canada's immigration policy history. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/national-economic-effects-of-government-103154

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.