NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan Research Paper

Length: 5 pages Sources: 1+ Subject: Terrorism Type: Research Paper Paper: #71818532 Related Topics: Russia, Humanitarian Intervention, Gorbachev, World Affairs
Excerpt from Research Paper :



European states generally backed NATO and the U.S. In the fight against terrorism. However, the EU appeared to be skeptical a propos the principal aims of the war and highlighted the fact that they were only willing to assume responsibility for their own actions in Afghanistan, claiming that they were primarily interested in defending the concept of peace through eliminating the terrorist threat. In an attempt to support the Afghanistan intervention, the EU has focused on investing as little finances as possible concomitantly with committing an effective strategy meant to guarantee that its mission would not be impeded.

NATO authorities acknowledged the fact that Russia assistance should not be ignored and that the country played an essential role in the Afghanistan Intervention. Considering Russia's complex military system and that the country was close to the Middle Eastern strategic point, it seems natural that NATO was dedicated to have Putin join the Afghanistan war.

While the relationship between Russia and the U.S. was tensioned as a result of George W. Bush's decision to abandon the anti-ballistic missile treaty signed in 1972, matters were resolved in November 2001, at the time when George Robertson (then NATO's Secretary-General) suggested that Russia should be provided with a status of equality with the nineteen members of NATO, thus having the right of decision in regard to the various topics emerging along with plans adopted for the Afghanistan war. Putin was interested in changing the way Russia was perceived by most of the world at the time and realized that one of the most excellent methods of doing so was to support NATO and the U.S. In the struggle in opposition to terrorism and as a consequence in the Afghanistan war.

While Russia is generally perceived as an equal partner in the fight against terrorism and in the Afghanistan intervention, critics have expressed uncertainty regarding this topic. Liberal authorities in Russia are apparently inclined to believe that their country did not actually benefit from its involvement in the Afghanistan war and that the U.S. And NATO basically used it as a tool. Putin was aware that...

...

Even with that, he did not want to behave similar to Yeltsin or Gorbachev, who were believed by the majority of Russians to be peons in the hands of the U.S. And one of the main reasons for which their country had lost prestige in the recent years. There were several critiques coming from Russian individuals on the topic of the Afghanistan war, relating to how the U.S.'s approach was exaggerated and that the North American country was merely trying to impose its supremacy as a world superpower through behaving as a principal actor in the fight against terrorism and by denying other countries the right to get equally involved in the state of affairs.

Bibliography:

Cross, S. Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 180.

Duffy, H. The "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 133.

Sloan, S.R. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p. 267.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 133.

S. Cross, Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 178.

S. Cross, Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 178, p. 179.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 193.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 193.

Ibid.

S.R. Sloan. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p. 267.

S. Cross, Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 --…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography:

Cross, S. Russia's Relationship with the United States/NATO in the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 19: 2, 175 -- 192, p. 180.

Duffy, H. The "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 133.

Sloan, S.R. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p. 267.

H. Duffy, the "war on terror" and the framework of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 133.


Cite this Document:

"NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan" (2010, November 08) Retrieved December 7, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nato-controversial-relationship-in-afghanistan-6979

"NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan" 08 November 2010. Web.7 December. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nato-controversial-relationship-in-afghanistan-6979>

"NATO's Controversial Relationship In Afghanistan", 08 November 2010, Accessed.7 December. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nato-controversial-relationship-in-afghanistan-6979

Related Documents
Afghanistan Is a Natural Crossroad
Words: 2870 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Terrorism Paper #: 90512475

The Karzai government adopted a five-point plan for accountability. It refused amnesty for gross violators of human rights abuses. An action plan was created by Afghan officials and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, with the support of the United Nations and the international community. The plan consisted of a five-part strategy for peace, justice and reconciliation in Afghanistan. It contained measures to concretely recognize and remember the sufferings

War in Afghanistan Following the
Words: 3674 Length: 13 Pages Topic: Terrorism Paper #: 30447159

Fallout A section of commentators have taken issue with the manner in which the federal government denied suspected terrorist the due process of law as stipulated under the constitution. The government even commissioned the establishment of a torture chamber in Guantanamo Bay. This amounts to gross violation of human rights and civil liberties. There is another clause in the patriot act dubbed "enhanced surveillance procedures," which allows federal authorities to gather

Can NATO Still Keep the Peace
Words: 2759 Length: 9 Pages Topic: American History Paper #: 44756767

Introduction The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established in 1949 as part of the post-war effort among the nations of the West to work together to establish the peace. Throughout the Cold War, NATO was more of a symbol than an actual military alliance. It was not until the Cold War ended that the first joint military NATO operations were conducted. The first was in 1990 and the second in

Post-Conflict, Peace/Nation Building in Iraq
Words: 7605 Length: 20 Pages Topic: Government Paper #: 14880804

This includes putting in place international legal systems, dispute resolution mechanisms as well as cooperative arrangements.14 The call this approach social peace-building or structural peace-building. Such peace-building involves "creating structures -- systems of behavior, institutions, concerted actions -- that support the embodiment or implementation of a peace culture."15 This is what the author's call multi-track diplomacy. It involves individuals who are not normally involved in the peace process, particularly business

Presidency and the Congress From
Words: 2562 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Military Paper #: 54468173

Other Congressional Democrats too are withdrawing their support of the president, including Senator Paul Kirk, Jr. Of Massachusetts. Health care reform too has seen a parting of the ways for some Democrats and the president. Health care reform was one of the primary issues President Obama focused on during his campaign. The historic vote in the House of Representatives brought him one step closer to seeing this reform come to

President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize
Words: 1730 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 221408

Indeed, arguably he is playing a little loose with the terms here, for persuasion, while it may be based on logic, is rarely simply logic. Rather it is logic combined with at least a coating of emotion. In the following passage toward the end of his speech Obama uses language that I believe to be persuasive in a way in which Aristotle would approve, for Obama is using facts to