Negotiation Scene
The Rock, a 1996 thrilling, high paced movie release, directed by Michael Bay and produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, demonstrated a series of intense and riveting scenes in which negotiation, and the negotiation process with accompanying successful attitudes, are played out in a violent and thrilling tale. Luckily for us, these negotiation scenes not only highlight the necessary skills and mind frames for successful marketing and business skills, but are also highly entertaining and artistically relevant. This suspenseful movie delivered high paced action scenes starring superstars Sean Connery, Nicholas Cage and Ed Harris. This movie artfully and demonstrably examined the use of negotiation skills in a high-stakes environment while simultaneously providing us with an opportunity to learn and understand the graceful and sometimes confusing task of information-based bargaining.
In order to fully understand and learn the useful applications presented in this film dealing with the techniques of information-based bargaining and the emotional control required to succeed, we must first set the conditions for understanding the specific negotiation. The story centers around a disgruntled, rogue general of the Marine special forces named Gen. Hummel. Gen. Hummel, having access to top-secret and sensitive information and weapons, desserts the Marine Corps in a desperate attempt to locate and retrieve the locations and circumstances of his former soldiers hidden from him by his superiors. Gen. Hummel proceeds to take various cities by hostage by threatening to launch VX gas weapons of mass destruction, gathered in his hideout near San Francisco on Alcatraz Island if his demands are not met. To complicate the situation, the government assembles a team of Navy SEALs and chemical warfare experts led by a former prisoner of Alcatraz to infiltrate Gen. Hummel's hideout and disarm the VX gas weapons being held at the former prison.
I selected this bargaining situation to highlight the need to control one's emotions within a negotiation session, especially when the stakes are abnormally high. This examination will focus on the dialogue between Gen. Hummel and the negotiating team in charge of the infiltration mission to recover the dangerous gas and detain the renegade Marines. The persuasive skills of all sides of this dilemma provide excellent reference points and substantial inspiration in helping us foster well-balanced agreements and negotiations.
Shell (2010) separated the negotiation process into four separate steps: preparation, information exchange, bargain, and settlement. Using these guidelines I will explore Shell's information-based bargaining principles by describing the negotiation between Gen. Hummel and the infiltration team led by Mason and Goodspeed, played by Sean Connery and Nicholas Cage in the movie The Rock. It is also important to understand that the negotiation to be examined includes the FBI and Pentagon forces which are actually conducting and controlling the raid on Alcatraz. Additionally, I will highlight certain instances of the varying scenes and relate them to Shell's interpretations and suggestions.
Preparing for negotiations is the first, and in my opinion, the most important sequence of successfully navigating the negotiation. These crucial first steps are integral in the negotiator setting the stage in one's own favor. First impressions and first intentions pace the remainder of the exchange so initiating and facilitating a personable start is extremely important. It appears Gen. Hummel spent his entire life preparing for this moment of glory. All of his military training and his past victories in war contribute to his preparedness. In fact, these direct results from his past experiences in these previous conflicts helps gives us insight into how emotional fatigue and combat weariness within a military career may take hold on any one individual. While his plans to take hostages and threaten the lives of many innocent civilians may seem harsh, in his eyes, these actions are justified due to his previous commitment to his benefactors.
Gen. Hummel has assembled his team of mercenaries dedicated to following his orders and committed to the memories of their fallen comrades who are deserving of their betrayal. Gen. Hummel has also prepared for this bargaining session by having full technological control over the missile systems that are at the heart of this negotiation. Gen. Hummel has anchored himself to the goal of bringing awareness to the plight of the fallen soldiers and rewarding those who have not received their just awards. It is important to realize that in any negotiation session, bringing past experiences, both successes and failures, into the present situation will help guide and provide a useful reminder to the actual purpose and motivation of the negotiation resulting in a successful...
Hostage Negotiation Keeping people as hostages has happened all through history. In the recent years, political events in Algeria, Kenya and Vietnam show examples of such terrible acts. Criminals, mentally challenged, prisoners are usually the people involved in hostage taking. Hostage crises have prevailed due to escalations of family member-on-member, family member-on-employee, intoxicated colleague, household dispute situations, disturbed client-on-employee and disturbed employee-on-client violence at workplace. Those involved in hostage taking activities
Deception techniques & lying There are situations in which lying or other deception techniques are used and are allowed as negotiation technique to save possible loss of life or to avert other such critical situations. Certain experts do not encourage the use of such techniques. Some say that lying or deception can only be used as last resort. The idea of using deception techniques if used regularly and randomly may damage
The secondary negotiator is also responsible for maintaining a more detached perspective than the primary and helping the primary remain objective and uninvolved on a personal psychological level (Schmalleger, 2008; Wind, 1995). One of the primary tools employed by hostage negotiators are information obtained about the underlying motives and psychological makeup of the hostage takers because that understanding enables them to structure their negotiating posture in the manner most conducive
Hostage Negotiations Following the deadly aftermath/fallout from the Attica prison riot in New York State in 1971 -- and from the bloody terrorist attack during the 1972 Olympic Games in Germany -- there have been attempts to change the way in which authorities go about crisis negotiation. This paper discusses the responses that authorities have had to these crisis situations and outlines the steps that have been taken to improve the
Negotiation Crisis Team The process of hostage and crisis negotiation is an event that involves a team, it is not something that can be performed by an individual and cannot be considered as a secondary activity. Such negotiations are meant to help in the management and/or resolution of very risky situations, and in most cases the situations are very tricky to deal with. The manner in which these situations present themselves
Hostage Negotiation The 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments have had serious impacts on modern hostage negotiations and will be examined in this paper. Elements that are to be considered include promise making, incriminating statements, as well as the planting of listening devices. Graham vs. Connor, State vs. Sands, and Taylor vs. Watters, among others, are some of the court cases that will be used in this discussion. Again, the impact of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now