Essay Doctorate 616 words

New Testament to Gospels Confusing, Repetitious Appears

Last reviewed: January 28, 2013 ~4 min read

New Testament to gospels confusing, repetitious appears conflicting DISCUSS PLEASE DO NOT COPY AND PASTE FROM THE INTERNET

Why Four Gospels?

There is much controversy regarding the fact that Christianity promotes the idea that it is perfectly natural for Christians to respect four gospels. Many people have trouble understanding the attitudes that they need to employ regarding the four gospels because they come across stories that are similar to one-another and because some points-of-view expressed by a particular gospel appear to contradict points present in other gospels. One needs to comprehend that the gospels were actually designed to express stories as seen from the perspective of the person writing them. As a consequence, some aspects in one gospel might differ from ideas in other gospels precisely because the writer interpreted ideas that he encountered and wrote them as seen from his point-of-view.

Most individuals are accustomed to thinking that the four gospels were designed with the purpose of accommodating four different cultures. This is apparently why Christianity refrained from only constructing a single gospel, as early Christians were well-acquainted with the fact that people needed personalized versions of the word of God in order for them to be able to understand the idea that Christianity in general is meant to put across. Matthew is generally believed to be written for Jewish individuals, Mark for Romans, Luke for Greeks, and John for society as a whole. Further analysis confirms this theory, considering that Matthew contains a lot of information from the Old Testament, Mark has a succinct style, Luke contains numerous references to complex ideas relating to science and culture, and John provides a clear account that involves a multitude of ideas, each of them being designed to be understood by a certain group of people.

People generally fail to understand why Christianity needs four gospels because they are unable to look at these documents without associating them with religious ideas. It is actually relatively simple to understand why it would be wrong to consider that the four gospels are confusing. People need to comprehend that these text have been written by different people and that in spite of the fact that they basically had the same stories in mind, they were determined to put across feelings that could be understood by a larger audience.

While the theory relating to how each gospel was meant to address a particular culture is interesting and difficult to contradict, it is actually impossible to verify. By interpreting each gospel individually one is likely to discover a lot of elements that stand in contrast with the culture that it apparently addresses. Each gospel is practically meant to assist a certain community experience a transition to Christianity and it would thus be impossible for either of them to praise a particular culture.

You’re 76% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
3 sources cited in this paper
  • Works cited:
  • • Pink, Arthur W., “Why Four Gospels?”, (Prisbrary Publishing)
  • • Platt, Elizabeth, “Four Portraits of Jesus: Studies in the Gospels and Their Old Testament Background”, (Paulist Press, 01.05.2004)
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). New Testament to Gospels Confusing, Repetitious Appears. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/new-testament-to-gospels-confusing-repetitious-85530

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.