No Child Left Behind Act Impact Of Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
756
Cite

¶ … No Child Left Behind Act Impact of the "No Child Left Behind Act" in California Schools

The Federal "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" which President Bush signed into law in January 2002, has been an issue of debate across the country for the last two years. Its impact on public education has varied from state to state.

According to the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," every state must annually test all students in grades 3 through 8 in math and reading by 2005, and in science by 2007 (http://www.greatschools.net/cgibin/showarticle/CA/205/improve).

Moreover states must "demonstrate adequate yearly progress toward learning standards for all groups of students," including the economically disadvantaged, racial and ethnic groups, disabled students such as physically or mentally challenged, and those students who are limited in the English language (http://www.greatschools.net/cgibin/showarticle/CA/205/improve).The goal of the NCLB is to achieve 100% proficiency for all students within twelve years and for every classroom to have well-qualified teachers by 2005, with middle and high school teachers, as well as new hires, demonstrating competency in their perspective subjects by "passing a test or by completing an academic major, graduate degree or comparable coursework" (http://www.greatschools.net/cgibin/showarticle/CA/205/improve).When California faced a high teacher turnover along with...

...

h tight budgets, many districts tried using "creative ways to fulfill the requirement" for new teacher hires by defining "interns with emergency credentials as highly qualified," however, the United States Department of Education issued a negative response to implementing such measures (http://www.greatschools.net/cgibin/showarticle/CA/205/improve).
The NCLB Act pressures all states to "pursue a standards-based reform agenda," including high academic standards with increased flexibility and greater accountability (http://www.edsource.org/edu_esea.cfm#features).For the fiscal year of 2003, California is expected to receive in NCLB funding some $2.9 billion, with $1.65 billion of that amount going to Title I grants for local education agencies (http://www.edsource.org/edu_esea.cfm#features).

The impact of the "No Child Left Behind Act" affects every segment of the education policy of California, requiring realignment of many regulations and procedures (http://www.edsource.org/edu_esea.cfm#features).

During the first half of 2003, California submitted plans for its intentions to meet the requirements set forth by the NCLB and will be better able to implement its programs and provisions when its course of action is approved by the federal government (http://www.edsource.org/edu_esea.cfm#features).Although, California has a strong accountability system and meets many of NCLB requirements, the NCLB requires the…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

About The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001." EdSource Online. May 2003. http://www.edsource.org/edu_esea.cfm#features.

A accessed 11-04-2003).

Hauck, Bill. "Overview of the Federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Impact on California Education Policies." Cal-Tax Digest. November 2002. http://www.caltax.org/member/digest/nov2002/11.2002.Hauck-OverviewFederalNoChildLeftBehind.04.htm.(accessed 11-04-03).

Nagel, Terry. "What No Child Left Behind Means for Your Child."
Great Schools.Net. http://www.greatschools.net/cgi-bin/showarticle/CA/205/improve.


Cite this Document:

"No Child Left Behind Act Impact Of" (2003, November 05) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/no-child-left-behind-act-impact-of-155451

"No Child Left Behind Act Impact Of" 05 November 2003. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/no-child-left-behind-act-impact-of-155451>

"No Child Left Behind Act Impact Of", 05 November 2003, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/no-child-left-behind-act-impact-of-155451

Related Documents

No Child Left Behind Act (Public Law 107-110, 115), is a Congressional Act signed into law by George W. Bush in January 2002. The Bill was a bi-partisan initiative, supported by Senator Edward Kennedy, and authorized a number of federal programs designed to improve standards for educational accountability across all States, districts, and increase the focus on reading. Much of the NCLB focus is based on the view that American

No Child Left Behind Act.
PAGES 3 WORDS 999

Review and Comment Indications suggest that Obama will endorse a rewritten version of No Child Left Behind once requirements like teacher quality and academic standards are toughened up to focus more attention on failing schools. This will mean more, not less, federal involvement in the program. Overall, reaction to Obama's plans are negative. Most who were opposed to Bush's policy had hoped for a brand new start rather than a rehash

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Key political, or legal issues, changes in K-12 assessment goals A Statute of instructive practice within the K-12 cluster involves instruction, curriculum and assessment among students. In this case, alignment ensures that the three capacities coordinated with the same goal and strengthened instead of working at cross-purposes. An appraisal will also measure the success of what the students are being taught on whether their

Negatives in No Child Left Behind (NCLB) What's wrong with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation that President George W. Bush and key members of the U.S. Congress put together in such a cooperative spirit in 2001? The NCLB was signed into law (in January, 2002) with such fanfare that teachers, parents, students and school boards nationwide had high hopes for a revolution in the way teachers teach and students

No Child Left Behind Act
PAGES 7 WORDS 1984

There are over 4.4 million ELs enrolled in U.S. public schools, a number that has doubled during the last decade, making ELs roughly 10% of the total enrollment nationwide (Conrad 2005). The demographic increases demonstrate to government agencies that more needs to be done to support and ensure their integration and success in the educational process, and standardized testing in English is the least appropriate way to meet their

No Child Left Behind Act
PAGES 16 WORDS 4890

These authors note that the obstacles for ELL students are particularly challenging, given that they include both educational and technical issues. These challenges include the following: Historically low ELL performance and very slow improvement. State tests show that ELL students' academic performance is far below that of other students, oftentimes 20 to 30 percentage points lower, and usually shows little improvement across many years. Measurement accuracy. Research shows that the language