Term Paper Undergraduate 378 words Human Written

Nutrition Research Study Comparison of

Last reviewed: ~2 min read English › Nutrition
80% visible
Read full paper →
Paper Overview

Nutrition Research Study Comparison of Handheld Computers for Nutrition Assessment and Support This study, reported in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, was to find out the differences between the various handheld computers nutritionists use and to determine if one kind was better than others. The purpose of the study was to compare and analyze...

Full Paper Example 378 words · 80% shown · Sign up to read all

Nutrition Research Study Comparison of Handheld Computers for Nutrition Assessment and Support This study, reported in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, was to find out the differences between the various handheld computers nutritionists use and to determine if one kind was better than others. The purpose of the study was to compare and analyze computational features on five commonly used handheld computers that are available for nutrition assessment and support.

A secondary objective was to establish a strategy for nutritionists that would help them to choose the one best suited to their needs. The researchers compared the objective and computational operating features of each of the five computers. Subjective features such as speed, which depends on the operator's experience, were not part of the study. Computational features and functions were placed in three classifications -- anthropometric, biochemical, or dietary assessment. For example, mean corpuscular volume and total lymphocyte count were considered biochemical.

The researchers also determined what computations each handheld was capable of doing. From this they produced two Tables showing which handheld had which features and capabilities. Results: Researchers found that some devices used Metropolitan Life Insurance height and weight tables to compute ideal body weight, while others used the Hamwi formula, and some used both. They discovered various anthropometric variables such as calculating body mass index, pediatric calculation capabilities, etc. They found that none of the computers used Internationale units, only English and/or metric.

They compared user instruction booklets for ease of understanding and found that none of the five included a toll-free telephone number. They also found variations between the calculators when basal energy expenditure and ideal body weight were calculated, but could only speculate about causes of the variations. Conclusions: The researchers conclude that there is no single "best" calculator. "Each user needs to determine whether.

76 words remaining — Conclusions

You're 80% through this paper

The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.

$1 full access trial
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant included Citation generator Cancel anytime
Sources Used in This Paper
source cited in this paper
2 sources cited in this paper
Sign up to view the full reference list — includes live links and archived copies where available.
Cite This Paper
"Nutrition Research Study Comparison Of" (2007, March 13) Retrieved April 18, 2026, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nutrition-research-study-comparison-of-39398

Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.

80% of this paper shown 76 words remaining