Ode On A Grecian Urn Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1053
Cite

Ode Grecian Entering the Greek and Roman art section of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, I was first struck by the skillful lighting and the overall professionalism inherent in the displays. There were not as many people in this section as in some of the others I had visited that day. Yet because of the caliber of artifacts exhibited at the Met, I still felt continuity with the greater world of ancient art. Looking around the gallery containing the Archaic Greek vases, painted in the "black figure" technique, I was immediately impressed by the range of imagery that was depicted on the vases. The sheer age of the vases was astounding. I know most of them were restored painstakingly by experts, but these were items about 2500 years old. I was drawn to one vase in particular, a "neck-amphora" made of terracotta construction and finished with the classic Archaic black figure technique. According to the description on the Metropolitan Museum's Web site, black figure vase painting involved the application of glaze "in silhouettes," and then after that, details like the drapery are incised using a fine object. The particular amphora I was looking at was attributed to an artist named Exekias. I did not know that there were any famous Greek vase painters.

Then I remembered the underlying purpose of my visit and why I selected this very gallery. I was gazing directly at the "still unravished bride of quietness," the "foster child of silence and slow time," (Keats lines 1, 2). A piece of art like the...

...

As Keats delicately put it in his "Ode on a Grecian Urn," a piece like this is a "Sylvan historian, who canst thus express / A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme." No sooner had I laid eyes on the urn that I quickly understood Keats' infatuation with classical Greek pottery. The first stanza of the poem finishes with a series of rhetorical questions as the poet ponders the meaning of the imagery on the vase. "What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape?" asks the poet (Keats, line 5). "What men or gods are these? What maidens loath? / What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?" (Keats lines 8, 9). These are the very same questions I asked when gazing at the amphora. Who did the painting depict? Why are the figures gathered around a chariot? Where are they going? Who are they? Are they gods or mortals?
Keats ultimately concludes that its silence is its power. Because the amphora cannot answer using words, it has an indelible power over time, history, and the human mind. Without words, the amphora transcends time. Its "Attic shape," and its "silent form" give the amphora a visual power that poetry or other writing does not have (Keats lines 41, 44). The viewer gazes that this splendid 2500-year-old object and is transported to a timeless realm at which all humanity unites. It is miraculous that a 2500-year-old vase can embody the power of time. What happens when viewing the vase is remarkable: instead of answering questions…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Keats, John. "Ode On a Grecian Urn."

"Neck-amphora, ca. 540 B.C.; Archaic; black-figure. Attributed to Exekias." Description online at: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/17.230.14a,b_27.16


Cite this Document:

"Ode On A Grecian Urn" (2012, March 04) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ode-on-a-grecian-urn-114324

"Ode On A Grecian Urn" 04 March 2012. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ode-on-a-grecian-urn-114324>

"Ode On A Grecian Urn", 04 March 2012, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ode-on-a-grecian-urn-114324

Related Documents
Ode on a Grecian Urn
PAGES 4 WORDS 1372

.." As the youth is in a constant state of seeking, eternally about to experience the joy of a first kiss. Relatable Human Emotion Though Keats means for the symbols to be expressed as unknown through the expression of curiosity about who these individuals might be: "What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape/ Of deities or mortals, or of both,/ In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?/ What men or gods are these? What maidens

Ode to a Grecian Urn
PAGES 2 WORDS 705

Ode to a Grecian Urn Keats John Keats' poem "Ode to a Grecian Urn," contains many messages about life, love, and history. Within its stanzas there are countless allusions to the fact that art, once recorded becomes and ideal of beauty, shattered only by the loss of such art but never degraded by time, memory or corporeal reality. The three themes that repeat throughout the work are those of love, silence,

Ode on a Grecian Urn by John Keats. Specifically it will discuss the points John Keats makes regarding the power of art to stir the imagination, to survive across time and space, and to give meaning to a world in flux. Keats poem celebrates the urn as an artifact of history and how that artifact is like a snapshot in time, illustrating the lives and the people of long-ago. This

Ode on a Grecian Urn" by John Keats; "The Convergence of the Twain" by Thomas Hardy; and "Fern Hill" by Dylan Thomas. Specifically, it will identify the common theme in these three poems, which is time. Time stops in all three poems for various reasons, and adds to the impact of each poem in a special way. COMMON THEME In "Ode on a Grecian Urn," Keats is celebrating the past, stopped

Keats: Ode on a Grecian
PAGES 6 WORDS 1784

All breathing human passion far above, That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy'd, burning forehead, and a parching tongue. A lines 28-30) The final lines of the Ode encapsulate the tension and conflict of the poem in a vision of art as the only means of resolving the disparity between the ideal and the real. When old age shall this generation waste, Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe Than ours, a friend to man,

Rousseau’s First Discourse and Keats’ “Ode on a Grecian Urn” both focus on Beauty as the sole arbiter of Truth and the only guide through life that society really needs. Yet each work is different because they both come to different conclusions: Rousseau’s treatise is a work of philosophical speculation that essentially rejects beauty and truth (justifying this rejection by referencing the words of Socrates no less), while Keats’ work