Verified Document

Online Teaching Vs. Traditional Face-To-Face Research Paper

Any lack of candor with reference to how I approach my interview is unethical. If I am interviewing a professor about online learning vs. what he does in classrooms, of course I don't need to go into deep, involved detail about what I might do if "a" or "b" occurs during the interview; but a forthright introduction to my intentions is the best ethical approach. TWO) No apologies need to be made in advance even though, let's say, the interview is to be with a housewife who has to babies at home and can't attend classes at the local community college. She may be suspicious of a college student's intentions. Consent is usually based on what the researcher plans to do with the information; my honest answer is, "I'm doing this for a research class and none of the information will be published or made public in any way." If she asks to see the report before I submit it, I cannot agree to that. THREE) the gatekeeper in this instance is the husband of the online student. My job is to present myself initially as a neutral, positive, well-groomed person on an assignment, and approach him with confidence, knowing he may be skeptical about my intentions. He is a friend of an employee at the university, and the employee...

FOUR) in a qualitative research genre, the interview is vital to my understanding of the "real world" of people and education. I must take into consideration the fact that the participant is ashamed that she barely got through high school, and I need to approach her with easy, friendly questions at the outset of the interview. Yes, her gender and her social position are pertinent to the tone of the questions I have prepared. She may be a little defensive in discussing why she is taking classes, so I will focus on what interesting things she has come across in her studies, to get the interview off to a good warm start.
Works Cited

Golafshani, Nahid. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.

The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607.

Schram, T.H. (2006). Conceptualizing and proposing qualitative research. Upper Saddle River,

NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Shank, G.D. (2006). Qualitative Research: A personal skills approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Golafshani, Nahid. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.

The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607.

Schram, T.H. (2006). Conceptualizing and proposing qualitative research. Upper Saddle River,

NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now